Navigating the Maze
Reflexivity as a Critical Skill in Spatialised Youth Transitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6584Keywords:
reflexivity, educational pathways, vulnerability, life course, spatialityAbstract
In contemporary debates on educational quality, learning outcomes are often framed in terms of measurable competences and performance indicators. However, this approach fails to identify reflexivity as a key learning outcome and a central transversal skill in today’s fast-changing and increasingly uncertain societies. Reflexivity is required for identifying and mobilising the knowledge and competences needed to reach one’s goals, and it necessitates understanding the surrounding opportunity structures. Further, we maintain that policy measures can impede or promote reflexivity, which is embedded in institutional arrangements and socio-spatial contexts.
We explored 1) how young people in vulnerable situations displayed reflexivity in educational and school-to-work transitions and disruptions in differing regions in Austria, Finland, and Portugal, and 2) how their reflexivity was supported, ignored, or hindered by their lived experiences of educational and labour market policies and practices. The comparative design enabled examining how distinct transition regimes and socio-spatial configurations shape the development and limits of reflexivity.
Our data consist of biographical narrative interviews with young people in vulnerable situations (N=67). From qualitative thematic analysis, three key themes emerged: 1) opportunities for reflexivity on educational pathways, 2) reflexivity on individual vulnerabilities, and 3) (lacking) institutional support for reflexivity.
The results highlight that reflexivity is shaped by interactions between individual characteristics, structural barriers, policy frameworks, and spatial inequalities. Institutional support is often uneven, fragmented, or misdirected across and within the countries – and often fails to reach those in most vulnerable situations. Thus, the low levels of youth reflexivity we observed were not individuals’ shortcomings or lacking abilities but reflected structurally conditioned opportunities for reflexive engagement. This article contributes to comparative debates on educational quality by demonstrating how learning outcomes are socially constructed through the interaction of actors, policies, and spaces.
Downloads
References
Aaltonen, S. (2013). ‘Trying to push things through’: Forms and bounds of agency in transitions of school-age young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.733807
Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity? Sociology, 40(3), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850663672
Alves, N., Azevedo, N., & Seabra, F. (2018). Vocational education and training policies: The tension between inclusion, employability, and democratisation. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/35916
Andreeva, A., & Bemler, E. (2025). Young people’s life and career choices in times of uncertainty. Journal of Youth Studies, 28(2), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2024.2446959
Araki, S., & Kariya, T. (2022). Credential Inflation and Decredentialization: Re-examining the Mechanism of the Devaluation of Degrees. European Sociological Review, 38, 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac004
Archer, M. (2007). Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, S.-A., Bimrose, J., Brown, A., Kettunen, J., & Vuorinen, R. (2020). Lifelong guidance policy and practice in the EU: trends, challenges and opportunities. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2767/91185
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. SAGE.
Benasso, S., Neves, T., Bouillet, D., & Parreira do Amaral, M. (Eds.) (2022). Landscapes of Lifelong Learning Policies across Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96454-2
CEDEFOP. (2024). Learning outcomes going global. A multifaceted phenomenon. Policy Brief. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications/9193
Cefalo, R., Scandurra, R., & Ioannidou, A. (2026). A European Assessment of Territorial Divides in Underachievement. In J. Tikkanen, M. Parreira do Amaral, T. Järvinen, & N. Alves (Eds.), Constructing Learning Outcomes: Problematizing (Under)Achievement in Europe (pp. 79–101). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350446717.ch-3
Chavez, C. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The qualitative report, 13(3), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1589
Cosner Berzin, S. (2010). Vulnerability in the transition to adulthood: Defining risk based on youth profiles. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.11.001
Council of the European Union. (2018). Council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, C 189/01.
Cuconato, M., Dale, R., Parreira do Amaral, M., & Walther, A. (2016). The Reshaping of Educational Trajectories in European Knowledge Societies. In A. Walther, M. Parreira do Amaral, M. Cuconato, & R. Dale (Eds.), Governance of Educational Trajectories in Europe: Pathways, Policy and Practice (pp. 1–13). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474287203.0006
Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2014). Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team. Quality and Quantity, 48(2), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y
Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016544
Dupéré, V., Leventhal, T., Dion, E., Crosnoe, R., Archambault, I., & Janosz, M. (2015). Stressors and Turning Points in High School and Dropout: A Stress Process, Life Course Framework. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 591-629. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314559845
Elder, G. H., Shanahan, M., & Jennings, J. (2015). Human Development in Time and Place. In M. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 6–54). Wiley.
Farrugia, D. (2013). Young people and structural inequality: beyond the middle ground. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(5), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.744817
Farrugia, D. (2015). Addressing the problem of reflexivity and theories of reflexive modernisation: Subjectivity and structural contradiction. Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313480396
Heflinger, C., & Hinshaw, S. (2010). Stigma in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Research: Understanding Professional and Institutional Stigmatization of Youth with Mental Health Problems and their Families. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0294-z
Hilal, M., Khabbache, H., & Ali, D. A. (2024). Dropping out of school: A psychosocial approach. Advances in Medicine, Psychology, and Public Health, 1(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10598523
Ho, J. (2024). Agentic selves, agentic stories: cultural foundations of beliefs about meritocracy. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 12, 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-023-00201-9
Järvinen, T., Naumanen, P., Tikkanen, J., Alves, N., Zeferino, L., Guimarães, P., Cavaco, C., Kovacheva, S., Hristozova, D., & Nanov, P. (2024a). Qualitative Research with Young People – National Qualitative Report. CLEAR Deliverable D5.2. https://clear-horizon.eu/publications/
Järvinen, T., Naumanen, P., Tikkanen, J., Alves, N., Zeferino, L., Guimarães, P., Cavaco, C., Kovacheva, S., Hristozova, D., & Nanov, P. (2024b). Qualitative Research with Young People – International Qualitative Analysis Report. CLEAR Deliverable D5.3. https://clear-horizon.eu/publications/
Kazepov, Y., Cefalo, R., Jablonczay, N., Pernhaupt, N., Ioannidou, A., Martin, A., Muders, S., Rambla, X, & Scandurra, R. (2023). Cross-national/cross-regional Quantitative Analysis Report. CLEAR Deliverable D3.2. https://clear-horizon.eu/publications/
Kettunen, J., Lee, J., & Vuorinen R. (2020). Exploring Finnish Guidance Counselors’ Conceptions of Career Management Skills. Sage Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020968778
Kim, C. Y. (2023). Towards a model for analysing adolescents' reflexivity: Reflectiveness, criticality and boundedness. Children & Society, 37, 1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12670
Lavchyan, Z., & Williamson, H. (2019). Youth Policy Essentials. Revision 2019. Council of Europe and European Commission. https://participationpool.eu/resource/youth-policy-essentials/
Maclure, R. (2017). Youth reflexivity as participatory research in Senegal: A field study of reciprocal learning and incremental transformations. Social Inclusion, 5(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i3.991
Marta, R. (2025). Permanent uncertainty and social vulnerability in contemporary risk society. Discover Global Society, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00277-3
Mertala, P. (2024). Datafixation of education. In M. Schiefner-Rohs, S. Hofues, & A. Breiter (Eds.), Datafizierung (in) der bildung: kritische perspektiven auf digitale vermessung in pädagogischen kontexten (pp. 31–42). Transcript.
O’Connor, C. (2014). Agency and reflexivity in boomtown transitions: young people deciding on a school and work direction. Journal of Education and Work, 27(4), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.751093
Parreira do Amaral, M., Löffler, J., & Zelinka, J. (2025). Comparative Analyses and Reporting. Comparative Analysis Report. CLEAR Deliverable D7.1. https://clear-horizon.eu/publications/
Petrescu, C., Ellena, A., Fernandes-Jesus, M., & Marta, E. (2021). Using Evidence in Policies Addressing Rural NEETs: Common Patterns and Differences in Various EU Countries. Youth & Society, 54(2_suppl), 69S-88S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211056361
Roberts, K. (2009). Opportunity structures then and now. Journal of Education and Work, 22(5), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080903453987
Scandurra, R., Cefalo, R., & Kazepov Y. (2021). School-to-work outcomes during the Great Recession, is the regional scale relevant? Journal of Youth Studies, 24(4), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1742299
Shin, K. Y., Kalleberg, A., & Hewison, K. (2023). Precarious work: A global perspective. Sociology Compass, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13136
Skattebol, J., & Redmond, G. (2019). Troubled kids? Locational disadvantage, opportunity structures and social exclusion. Children’s Geographies, 17(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1487031
Skirbekk, V., Tamnes, C., Júlíusson, P., Jugessur, A., & von Soest, T. (2025). Diverging trends in the age of social and biological transitions to adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2025.100690
Threadgold, S. (2011). Should I pitch my tent in the middle ground? On ‘middling tendency’, Beck and inequality in youth sociology. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2010.538042
Tikkanen, J., Parreira do Amaral, M., Järvinen, T., & Alves, N. (Eds.) (2026). Constructing Learning Outcomes – Problematizing (Under)Achievement in Europe. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350446717
Walther, A. (2022). Welfare States as Transition Regimes: Reconstruction from International Comparisons of Young People’s Transitions to Work. In B. Stauber, A. Walther, & R. A. Settersten, Jr. (Eds.), Doing Transitions in the Life Course. Life Course Research and Social Policies, vol 16 (pp. 37–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13512-5_3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jenni Tikkanen, Liliana Zeferino, Niklas Pernhaupt, Ruggero Cefalo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
