General Practitioners' Discretion of Preventive Needs

Sofie Ilsvard; Marie Østergaard Møller

doi:10.7577/pp.1215

General Practitioners' Discretion of Preventive Needs

Forfattere

Sofie Ilsvard Aarhus University
Marie Østergaard Møller KORA - Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1215

Sammendrag

This article examines general practitioners’ discretion in preventive contexts. Based on semi-structured interviews with 15 general practitioners, we examine how lifestyle is used in their discretionary practices in contexts of healthcare prevention. Despite common educational background and professional ideology, GPs’ do not share lifestyle and our analyses show that this matters to their discretion of patients’ need for lifestyle intervention. The correspondence between general practitioners’ preventive strategies and their own lifestyle preferences is interpreted as evidence of autonomy in general practice where general practitioners act relatively autonomously and differ in their interpretation of how preventive policies should be exercised in practice towards patients.

Keywords: discretion, lifestyle, health prevention and promotion, street-level bureaucrats, general practitioners

Nedlastinger

Nedlastingsdata er ikke tilgjengelig enda.

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2015-10-16

Hvordan referere

Ilsvard, S., & Møller, M. Østergaard. (2015). General Practitioners’ Discretion of Preventive Needs. Professions and Professionalism, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1215

Last ned referanse

Utgave

Vol 5 Nr. 3 (2015)

Seksjon

Artikler

Lisens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).