Scientific Professionalism Among Iranian Scientific Associations: Beyond Sociology and Liberal Academic Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.6524Emneord (Nøkkelord):
scientific professionalism, academic achievement, extra-academic professionalism, scientific societies, Iran, hybrid professionalismSammendrag
This article examines how scientific professionalism is organized under institutional constraints and structural pressures. It extends Burawoy’s fourfold typology—professional, critical, policy, and public—beyond sociology to other sciences, focusing on Iranian scientific associations. Professional work concerns intra-disciplinary standards; critical work reflects scientific assumptions and practices; policy work addresses institutional problem-solving and decision-making; and public work connects expert knowledge to wider publics. Drawing on survey data from 100 active Iranian scientific associations, the article shows that all four forms of professionalism can be identified beyond sociology, but not as clearly distinct roles. Scientific professionalism in Iran is weighted toward the professional dimension: critical reflection remains largely embedded in professional standards, while public and policy engagement overlap through semi-formal or institutional channels. In summary, typologies developed within liberal academic environments require reinterpretation when applied to non-liberal contexts characterized by centralized governance and oversight, metric-driven evaluation, limited public visibility, and political influence.
Nedlastinger
Referanser
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001
Abbott, A. (2007). For humanist sociology. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 195–209). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0014
Arribas Lozano, A. (2018). Reframing the public sociology debate: Towards collaborative and decolonial praxis. Current Sociology, 66(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117715897
Ben-David, J. (1972). The profession of science and its powers. Minerva, 10(3), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556920
Bird, S. J. (1998). The role of professional societies: Codes of conduct and their enforcement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(3), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0023-0
Brint, S. (2005). Guide for the perplexed: On Michael Burawoy’s public sociology. The American Sociologist, 36(3–4), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1017-y
Burawoy, M. (2004). The world needs public sociology. Sociologisk Tidsskrift, 12(2), 255–272. http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/PS/Norway.pdf
Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102
Burawoy, M. (2007). For public sociology. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 23–64). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0002
Burawoy, M. (2021). Public sociology. Polity Press.
Burawoy, M., & Benson, M. (2025, March 25). Michael Burawoy in conversation: His final interview examines public sociology’s role today [Interview]. The Sociological Review Magazine. https://doi.org/10.51428/tsr.qnka6083
Commission of Iranian Scientific Associations. (2016). Performance evaluation indicators for Iranian scientific associations (3rd ed.; Document No. 23/23/23899-1). Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. https://iidsa.ir/documents-and-rules/
Commission of Iranian Scientific Associations. (2021). Report on the scores and rankings of Iranian scientific associations. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. https://web.archive.org/web/20220131073818/https://isac.msrt.ir/file/download/page/1629779620-99-98-.pdf
Deflem, M. (2005). Public sociology, hot dogs, apple pie, and Chevrolet. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 1(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.62915/2154-8935.1001
Durkheim, E. (2014). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.; S. Lukes, Ed.). Free Press.
Farasatkhah, M. (2007). Barrasi-ye naghsh-hā-ye anjoman-hā-ye elmi va dāneshgāhiyān dar siyāsatgozāri va arzyābi-ye nezām-e elmi-ye keshvar [A study of the role of scientific associations and academics in the policymaking and evaluation of the national scientific system]. Rahyaft, 17(41), 4–12. https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13452.html
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Ghaneirad, M. A. (2006). Vaz’iyat-e ejtemā’-e elmi dar reshteh-ye olum-e ejtemā’i [The state of the scientific community in the field of social sciences]. Nāmeh-ye Olum-e Ejtemā’i, (27), 27–56. https://sid.ir/paper/438792/fa
Ghaneirad, M. A., Qarakhani, M., & Mirzaie, S. A. (2019). Ruykard-e anjomani be akhlāq-e herfe’i-ye elm dar Irān [An associational approach to the professional ethics of science in Iran]. Sociological Review, 25(2), 337–382. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsr.2019.70358
Glenn, E. N. (2007). Whose public sociology? The subaltern speaks, but who is listening? In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 212–230). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0015
Goldberg, T., & van den Berg, H. (2009). Scientific associations in an age of globalization: The case of sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 34(4), 1105–1138. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs6312
Heshmati, A., & Dibaji, S. M. (2019). Science, technology, and innovation status in Iran: Main challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 545–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721819873192
Holmwood, J. (2007). Sociology as public discourse and professional practice: A critique of Michael Burawoy. Sociological Theory, 25(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00300.x
Islamic World Science Citation Center. (2024). Iran’s scientific ranking in WOS (April–May 2024). https://tinyurl.com/44k8cdyc
Khalifeh Soltani, H., Faghihi, A., & Vaezi, R. (2012). Naqsh-e anjoman-hā-ye elmi va nezām-e tasmim-giri-hā-ye elmi-ye keshvar [The role of scientific associations in the country’s scientific decision-making system]. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 6(24), 89–111.
Khosrokhavar, F., Ghaneirad, M. A., & Toloo, G. (2007). Institutional problems of the emerging scientific community in Iran. Science, Technology and Society, 12(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180701200201
Massey, D. S. (2007). The strength of weak politics. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 145–157). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0010
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
Mieg, H. A. (2022). Science as a profession: And its responsibility. In H. A. Mieg, The responsibility of science. Studies in history and philosophy of science (pp. 67–90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91597-1_4
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
Mirzaie, S. A., & Qarakhani, M. (2014). Akhlāq-e pazhūhesh dar olūm-e ejtemāʿi-ye Irān [Research ethics in Iranian social sciences]. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 15(2), 3–23.
Mitroff, I. I. (1974). Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423
Morrow, R. A. (2009). Rethinking Burawoy’s public sociology: A post-empiricist critique. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The handbook of public sociology (pp. 47–70). Rowman & Littlefield.
Nasiri, A., Hussain, Z., & Kochin, D. (2015). Does Iran’s scientific development support its sustainable development? Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(3), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n3p89
Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. In D. Sills (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (pp. 536–547). Macmillan.
Patterson, O. (2007). About public sociology. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 176–194). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0013
Perkin, H. (1969). Key profession: The history of the association of university teachers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443480
Powell, C. (2013). Five reflexive critiques of public sociology. Critical Sociology, 39(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511434217
Qarakhani, M., & Mirzaie, S. A. (2014). Akhlāq-e elm dar fazā-ye āmūzesh-e olūm-e ejtemāʿi-ye Irān [Scientific ethics in the educational space of social sciences in Iran]. Sociological Review, 21(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsr.2014.56286
Qarakhani, M., & Mirzaie, S. A. (2016). Avāmel-e moʾasser bar nārāsti-ye ākādemik dar fazā-ye āmūzesh-e olūm-e ejtemāʿi [Factors affecting academic dishonesty in the space of social science education: A case study of public universities in Tehran]. Iranian Journal of Cultural Research, 9(2), 29–48.
Qarakhani, M., & Mirzaie, S. A. (2022). Akhlāq-e elm va anjoman-hā-ye elmi dar Irān [Ethics of science and scientific associations in Iran]. Agah Publishing.
Quah, S. R. (2005). Four sociologies, multiple roles. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00071.x
Quah, S. R. (2011). Sociology: Opportunities and professional challenges. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853111X549867
Raj, A., & Sinha, A. (2024). A bibliometric review study of Michael Burawoy. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, Article 1337742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1337742
Smith-Lovin, L. (2007). Do we need a public sociology? It depends on what you mean by sociology. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 124–134). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0008
Stinchcombe, A. L. (2007). Speaking truth to the public, and indirectly to power. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 135–144). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0009
Sullivan, W. M. (2005). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Tarikhi, P. (2020). Sanctions and the scientific community of Iran. Sociology of Islam, 8(2), 225–264. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-00802005
Tittle, C. R. (2004). The arrogance of public sociology. Social Forces, 82(4), 1639–1643. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0095
Turner, J. H. (2005). Is public sociology such a good idea? The American Sociologist, 36(3–4), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1015-z
Wallerstein, I. (2007). The sociologist and the public sphere. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 168–175). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0012
Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge.
Webster, E. (2004). Sociology in South Africa: Its past, present, and future. Society in Transition, 35(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2004.10419105
Yaminfirooz, M., Esbakian, S., Karimkhani, Z., & Gholinia, H. (2024). A scientometric study of the scientific output of top Iranian medical scientists. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 15(5), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2022.27902.3753
Zussman, R., & Misra, J. (2007). Introduction. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 3–22). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.003.0001
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2026 Ayat Mirzaie, Masoumeh Qarakhani
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
