BAD: Body – Art – Digital technology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.5454

Keywords:

running, body, art, digital technology, dissensus, intra-actions, ecological awareness

Abstract

During the first lockdown in March 2020, I started running two to three times a week to a nearby beach. Since then, I have stopped each time about halfway, and have been filming the sea view from the same spot for 30 seconds with my mobile phone. The now over 550 films (October 2024) are stored on the digital platform Padlet that makes it possible to share with others. The project My stunning stream - Made with a little mischief (Skregelid, 2020-) makes use of a/r/tography which is a practice-based methodological approach that unites art, education, and research. A/r/tography explores art, research and education as forms of performative, explorative and lived inquiry, and thereby stretches the boundaries between these domains. This article draws attention to how the body and digital technology are entangled and interwoven in this project, and how this affective connectedness offers potentials for enabling ecological awareness in educational settings. It makes use of theories that consider bodies and technologies as united intra-actions and that are concerned with how to live your life in the world.

Photo: Libeth Skregelid

Author Biography

Lisbet Skregelid, University of Agder

Lisbet Skregelid (Ph.D.) is Professor at the University of Agder, Faculty of Fine Arts.

References

Biesta, G. J. J. (2021). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003098331

Biesta, G., Skregelid, L., Bøe, T. D. (2024). Being human today: Art, education and mental health in conversation. Intellect Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13524414

Andreassen, J. K. & Hansen, B. H. (2023, 16 February). Mobilforbud i skolen gjør unge mer aktive Utdanningsnytt. https://www.utdanningsnytt.no/bjorge-herman-hansen-johan-kristian-andreasen-mobil-i-skolen/mobilforbud-i-skolen-gjor-unge-mer-aktive/349884

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfwway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq

Bennet, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

Bishop, C. (2023). Information overload. Artforum. https://www.artforum.com/features/claire-bishop-on-the-superabundance-of-research-based-art-252571/

Hareide, H. H. (2023, 11 August). Akademiseringa av kunstskulane: Når kunstutøving blir forsking. Morgenbladet. https://www.morgenbladet.no/kultur/reportasje/2023/08/11/akademiseringa-av-kunstskulane-nar-kunstutoving-blir-forskning/

Illeris, H. (2020). Intimacy, solidarity, fragility. Everyday objects and ecological awareness in arts and crafts education. Acoustic Space, 18(3), 153–168.

Illeris, H., Knudsen, K. N., & Skregelid, L. (2022). A/r/tografi som tilgang til udvikling af en sanselig bæredygtighedsdidaktik i kunstfagene. Nordic Journal of Art & Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/information.5067

Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J. L. (2016). Ways of walking: Etnography and practice on foot. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315234250

Irwin, R. (2012). A/r/tography, in L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage, 26– 29.

Irwin, R. (2013). Becoming a/r/tography, Studies in Art Education, 54(3), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315234250

Irwin, R., Lasczik, A., Sinner, A., Triggs, V. (2024). A/r/tography: Essential readings and conversations. Intellect Books.

Lasczik, A., Irwin, R., Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Rousell, D., Lee, N. (2021). Walking with a/r/tography. Springer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315234250

LeBlanc, N. & Irwin, R. L. (2019). A/r/tography. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.393

Lee, N., Moreno, K., Mosavarzadeh M., Irwin, R. (2019). Walking propositions: Coming to know a/r/tographically, International Journal of Art & Design Education 38(3), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12237

Lee, N., Moreno, K., Mosavarzadeh M., Irwin, R. (2024). Walking propositions: Coming to know a/r/tographically, In R. Irwin, A. Lasczik, A.Sinner, V. Triggs, V. (Eds). A/r/tography: Essential readings and conversations (pp. 421-432). Intellect Books.

Lee, N., Irwin, R., Baldus, A, Barney, D. T., Ursino, J. M., Valiary Eskandary, Z. (Eds.), (2024a). Pedagogical propositions: Playful walking with a/r/tography. Book one: Encounters. InSEA Publications.

Lee, N., Irwin, R., Baldus, A, Barney, D. T., Ursino, J. M., Valiary Eskandary, Z. (Eds.), (2024b). Pedagogical propositions: Playful walking with a/r/tography. Book two: Essays. InSEA Publications.

Lee, N., Irwin, R., Baldus, A, Barney, D. T., Ursino, J. M., Valiary Eskandary, Z. (Eds.), (2024c). Pedagogical propositions: Playful walking with a/r/tography. Book three: Curriculum. InSEA Publications.

Manning, E. (2009). Taking the next step, touch as technique. Sense and Society, 4, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425148

Massumi, B. (2015). The power at the end of the economy. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822375814

Medietilsynet (2020, 11 February). Barn og medier 2020: Om sosiale medier og skadelig innhold på nett, Medietilsynet, Delrapport 1.

Morton, T. (2018). Being ecological. Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11638.001.0001

Murakami, H. (2009). What I talk about when I talk about running. Vintage.

Myhre, C. O. & Waterhouse, A. H. L. (2023). Metodologiske ut-viklinger: Om kvalitativ og postkvalitativ forskning i barnehage. Fagbokforlaget.

O’Sullivan, S. (2001). The aesthetics of affect thinking art beyond representation, ANGELAKI Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 6 (3), 125– 135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250120087987

Page, T. (2018). Teaching and learning with matter. Arts, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7040082

Rancière, J. (2009). The emancipated spectator. Verso.

Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus on politics and aesthetics. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001

Skregelid, L. (2016). Tribuner for dissens. En studie av ungdomsskoleelevers møter med samtidskunst i en skole- og kunstmuseums kontekst [Doktorgradsavhandling, Universitetet i Oslo].

Skregelid, L. (2020). A call for dissensus in art education! International Journal of Education Through Art, 16(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00024_1

Skregelid, L. (2021). Dissensuality and affect in education, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40(4), 690–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12381

Skregelid, L. (2022). Når kunsten tar over: Betydningen av kunst som overordnet prinsipp i skolen. In L. Skregelid & K. N. Knudsen (Eds.), Kunstens betydning? Utvidede perspektiver på kunst og barn & unge (pp. 43–68). Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.163.ch2

Skregelid, L. (2023). When you get what you want but not what you need…. In L. Skregelid & M. Klungland (Eds.), Arts in action: Urgencies in art and art education. Special issue. APRIA. https://doi.org/10.37198/APRIA.05.06.A8

Skregelid, L. (2024a). The art of running and being (or just running and being?), in G. Biesta, L. Skregelid and T. D. Bøe (Eds), Being human today: Art, education and mental health in conversation (pp. 35– 56). Intellect Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13524414.7

Skregelid, L. (2024b). Dissens and sensibility. Why art matters. Intellect Books.

Skregelid, L. (2024c) I want you to run. In: N. Lee, R. Irwin, A. Baldus, D. T. Barney, J. M. Ursino, Z, Valiary Eskandary. (Eds.), Pedagogical propositions: Playful walking with a/r/tography. Book one: Encounters (pp. 70-75). InSEA Publications.

Skregelid, L. (2024d). The art of teaching: A proposition for pedagogy of dissensus. In: A. Sinner, and T. Osler (Eds.), Propositions for museum education: International art educators in conversation (pp. 343-356). Intellect Books.

Skregelid, L. & Biesta, G. J. J. (2022). Art keeps us in and with the world: Gert Biesta in Conversation with Lisbet Skregelid. In L. Skregelid & K. N. Knudsen (Eds.), Kunstens betydning? Utvidede perspektiver på kunst og barn & unge (pp. 29–42). Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.163.ch1

Solnit, R. (2001). Wanderlust. A history of walking. Verso

Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L. & Kind, S. W. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text, Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897– 912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280696

Yksnøy, C. (2023). Be(come)ing aware: An artographic walking with colour herbarium. [Master Thesis. USN].

Østern, T. P. (2019). Å forske med kunsten som metodologisk praksis med aesthesis som mandat. Journal for Research in Arts and Sports Education, Special Issue: «Å forske med kunsten» Vol. 1, 2017, 7–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/jased.v1.982

Tighlight at the seashore with high-dive platform

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16

How to Cite

Skregelid, L. (2024). BAD: Body – Art – Digital technology. Nordic Journal of Art & Research, 13(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.5454