Sketching across borders
Borderscapes through a/r/tography as living inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.5377Emneord (Nøkkelord):
a/r/tography, borders, borderscape, comics, comics-based research, drawing, metaphor, ruptureSammendrag
This article explores borderscapes as multilayered or displaced geopolitical and cultural borders through a/r/tography as living inquiry. Art making (via cartoons), arts-related research, a/r/tography, and border studies constitute a broad interdisciplinary framework for the study. The starting point is that a/r/tography as living inquiry provides an approach where interdisciplinarity can be seen more in terms of a “rupture where in absence, new courses of action unfold”, than as “a patchwork of different disciplines” (Springgay et al., 2005, p. 898). Hence, the main research question asked is: What kinds of new actions and understandings develop with ruptures involving visual arts-related research and the borderscape notion featured in this project? The focus is on the cartoons that address borders from different perspectives. The a/r/tographic viewpoints of metaphor and metonymy, openings, and embodiment are used to analyze these cartoons, their making processes, and ruptures that are linked to them. Moreover, I use general vantage points such as playfulness and temporality (memory) in my analysis. What was learned from a/r/tography in this study is how an a/r/tographic viewpoint could help to specify the symbolic ruptures within the visual and theoretical understandings of borders. In addition, the idea of playful openings was developed here to overcome not only the visual ruptures in the cartoons, but also those ruptures that are caused by the limitations of memory. Consequently, four ruptures – symbolic, visual, internal, and temporal – were approached as new actions and understandings that help to reconsider the border theory. For instance, it became clearer how the idea of borderscape touches on shifts of perspectives (identities) besides border spaces and other border processes. Thus, the observations in this paper can be used in the future for developing the study of the diversity of the border studies conceptualizations. Furthermore, the article provides insights through which to rethink connections between arts, scholarly disciplines, learning, and living inquiry; inward and outwards, as well as back and forth in time.
Comic strip: Kari Korolainen
Referanser
Artworks
The original artworks and sketches are in the possession of the author.
Figure 1. At the border. One of my early drawings on the topic of borders. © Kari Korolainen 2018.
Figure 2. A Border Artist? © Kari Korolainen 2018.
Figure 3. Sketches for the Project. Jan 11, 2022. © Kari Korolainen 2022.
Figure 4. A Borderless Border Drawing: “Border(e)scapes.” © Kari Korolainen 2022.
Figure 5. A Heavy Crown. (Original Version.) © Kari Korolainen 2022.
Figure 6. A Detail from a Sketchbook. A Drawing on a Pike and a Character Holding its Hands Out Over It. 2014. © Kari Korolainen 2014.
Literature
Andersen, D. J., & Prokkola, E.-K. (2021). Heritage as bordering: Heritage making, ontological struggles and the politics of memory in the Croatian and Finnish borderlands. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 36(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2018.1555052
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. SAGE.
Bartlett, R. (2012). Playing with meaning: using cartoons to disseminate research findings. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112451037
Bickel, B. (2012). Decolonizing the divine through co-a/r/tographic praxis in matrixial borderspaces. Visual Arts Research, 38(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.38.2.0112
Brambilla, C. (2015). Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics, 20(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
Carter, M. R. (2014). The teacher monologues: Exploring the identities and experiences of artist-teachers. SensePublishers.
DellʼAgnese, E., & Amilhat Szary, A-L. (2015). Borderscapes: From border landscapes to border aesthetics. Geopolitics, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1014284
Farinella, M. (2018). The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010401
Hannigan, S. (2012). A/r/tography and place ontology. Visual Arts Research, 38(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.38.2.0085
Irwin, R. (2003). Toward an aesthetic of unfolding in/sights through curriculum. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.25071/1916-4467.16859
Konrad, V., Laine, J. P., Liikanen, I., Scott, J. W., & Widdis, R. (2019). The language of borders. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.), Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 2175–2191). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_52-1
Korolainen, K. (2020). Graphic aspects of mobility: folkloristic-ethnological drawings as a starting point for discussing mobility and borders. Electronic Journal of Folklore, 79. https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2020.79.korolainen
Korolainen, K. (2016). Kasvokkain sähkömorsiamen ja valtion kanssa. RAJAT / BORDERS. VIII Kulttuurintutkimuksen päivät, 3.−4.12.2015, Oulun yliopisto. Elore 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30666/elore.79244
Krichker, D. (2021). Making sense of borderscapes: Space, imagination and experience. Geopolitics, 26(4), 1224–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1683542
Kurki, T. (2014). Borders from the cultural point of view: An introduction to writing at borders. Culture Unbound, 6(6), 1055–1070. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1461055
Kuttner, P. J., Sousanis, N., & Weaver‑Hightower, M. B. (2018). How to draw comics the scholarly way: Creating comics-based research in the academy. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Handbook of Arts-Based Research (pp. 396–422). The Guilford Press.
Leavy, P. (2012). Introduction to visual arts research special issue on a/r/tography. Visual Arts Research, 38(2), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.38.2.0006
McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics: the invisible art. HarperPerennial.
MacDonald, A., & Moss, T. (2015). Borderlands: traversing spaces between art making and research. Qualitative Research Journal, 15(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-05-2015-0032
Moran, J. (2010). Interdisciplinarity. 2nd ed. Florence: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866184
Nyman, J. (2021). Borderscapes of Calais: Images of the ‘Jungle’ in Breach by Olumide Popoola and Annie Holmes. In J. Schimanski & J. Nyman (Eds.), Border images, border narratives (pp. 187–205). Manchester University Press.
Nyman, J. (2019). Sonic borderscapes in Richard Curtis’s film The Boat that Rocked (2009). Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 28(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2019.1652610
Perera, S. (2007). A Pacific zone? (In)security, sovereignty, and stories of the Pacific borderscape. In P. Kumar Rajaram & C. Grundy-Warr (Eds.), Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge (pp. 201–227). University of Minnesota Press.
Phelan, P., & Rogoff, I. (2001). “Without”: A Conversation. Art Journal, 60(3), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2001.10792075
Rainford, J. (2021). Stripping back the novelty: A critical reflection on the dual use of a comic-based approach to engage participants and publics. Methodological Innovations, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211060681
Rajaram, P. K., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2007). Introduction. In P. Kumar Rajaram & C. Grundy-Warr (Eds.), Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge (pp. ix–xl). University of Minnesota Press.
Rosello, M., & Wolfe, S. (2017). Introduction. In J. Schimanski & S. Wolfe (Eds.), Border aesthetics: Concepts and intersections (pp. 1–24). Berghahn Books.
Sadowski-Smith, C. (2008). Border fictions: Globalization, empire, and writing at the boundaries of the United States. University of Virginia Press.
Savin-Baden, M., & Wimpenny, K. (2014). A practical guide to arts-related research. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-815-2
Schimanski, J. (2006). Crossing and reading: Notes towards a theory and a method. Nordlit, 19, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.7557/13.1835
Scott, J. W. (2020). Introduction to a research agenda for border studies. In J. W. Scott, T. Kurki, & J. P. Laine (Eds.), A research agenda for border studies (pp. 3–24). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972741.00007
Sinner, A. (2017). Cultivating researchful dispositions: A review of a/r/tographic scholarship. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 16(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2016.1183408
Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Wilson Kind, S. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280696
Turunen, J. (2021). Mapping the idea of Europe: Cultural production of border imaginaries through Heritage. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 38(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1918569
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2024 Kari Korolainen
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Forfattere som publiserer med dette tidsskriftet må være enige i følgende vilkår:
a) Forfattere beholder opphavsrett, men gir tidsskriftet rett til første publikasjon med arbeidet, samtidig som artikkelen er lisensiert under en Creative Commons Attribution-lisens som tillater andre å dele arbeidet med en anerkjennelse og referanse til forfatterskap og første publikasjon i dette tidsskriftet.
b) Forfattere må ikke inngå separate, ytterligere kontraktsmessige ordninger for eksklusiv distribusjon av artikkelens publiserte versjon av arbeidet (for eksempel legge det til et institusjonelt arkiv eller publisere det i en fagbok), uten referanse en anerkjennelse av hvor artikkelen først ble publisert. Dette gjelder for eksempel artikler som publiseres i Nordisk Barnehageforskning og som senere blir del av et doktorgradsarbeid. Da er det viktig å ha tydelige referanser til hvor og når artikkelen er publisert første gang.
c). Forfattere kan ikke legge inn sine arbeid på nettet eller publisere dem i en doktoravhandling (for eksempel i institusjonelle arkiv eller på en hjemmeside) før eller under innsendings- og fagfellevurderingsprosessen, da dette kan skape uorden i referansesystemet til artikkelen.