Understanding Research Motivations and Barriers Among Danish Sonographers in Radiology Departments: A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.6140Keywords:
Sonography, Motivation, Radiographer, EducationAbstract
Introduction: In Denmark sonographers, undergo profound training and have a notable presence in clinical practice. Understanding the factors behind their limited research engagement is important. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing sonographers' research involvement, focusing on motivational elements and barriers. Our investigation was structured around three key research questions: a) What motivates sonographers to engage in research? b) What obstacles hinder their involvement? c) How can we enhance the participation of sonographers in research in Denmark?
Methods: This study had an explorative inductive qualitative approach. The data collection method was a focus group session with sonographers from the National Sonographers Network.
The focus group session followed a structured guide and was verbatim transcribed. Thematic analysis by coding and identifying themes was performed individually by three authors. Subsequently, Social Cognitive Theory was incorporated as a framework for further analysis.
Results: Regarding motivations for engaging in research, the themes were Impact on Practice and Personal Interest. In terms of obstacles to research involvement, the themes included Challenges in Staffing and Time Management, Low Priority and Interest, Limited Research Experience and Practical Skills, and Insufficient Support. Regarding enhancements for participation, the themes were Management and Communications and Networks.
Conclusion: Sonographers in Danish public radiology departments demonstrate a high interest in research, driven by personal and clinical practice impacts. Their intrinsic motivation fosters idea generation and collaboration in research. Key barriers include heavy workloads and limited research skills. Cultivating a supportive, research-friendly environment is important for meaningful participation. Enhancing management and colleague support can bridge existing gaps and encourage active research engagement.
References
Society and College of Radiographers. Ultrasound Workforce UK Census 2019. London: Society and College of Radiographers; 2019. Available from: https://www.sor.org/getmedia/cb5f34dd-15b2-4595a37b7ebdc4bb8d4f/ultrasound_workforce_uk_census_2019.pdf_2#:~:text=In%20May%20and%20June%202019%2C%20the%20Society%20and,of%20vacancies%20and%20details%20of%20the%20workforce%20structure.
Data USA. Diagnostic medical sonographers [Internet]. Data USA; 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://datausa.io/profile/soc/diagnostic-medical-sonographers?redirect=true
Pedersen MRV, Bailey S, Bhimji-Hewitt S. Sonographers in healthcare systems: A comparative commentary between the Danish and Canadian sonographic landscape. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024;55:101718. https://doi.org10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101718
McGregor R. Introduction of a Sonographer Practitioner role in the Australian Health Care system: opportunities and barriers. Australia: University of Sydney, 2014. 151 p.
5. American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Sonography Practice Standards. Albuquerque, NM: American Society of Radiologic Technologists; 2019.
University of Southern Denmark. Beskrivende ultralydsradiograf/-sygeplejerske [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 24]. Available from: https://www.sdu.dk/da/uddannelse/efter_videreuddannelse/kurser/sundhed_medicin_pleje/beskrivende-ultralydsradiograf
Elliott V, Wilson SE, Svensson J, Brennan P. Research utilisation in sonographic practice: Attitudes and barriers. Radiography. 2009;15(3):187-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2008.06.003
Miles N, Cowling C, Lawson C. The role of the sonographer - An investigation into the scope of practice for the sonographer internationally. Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.017
Pedersen MRV, Kraus B, Santos R, Harrison G. Sonographers’ perspectives on research – A worldwide online questionnaire study. Radiography. 2024;30(2):483-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.010
Harrison G, Martins dos Santos R, Kraus B, Pedersen MRV. Radiographers in ultrasound: Motivation and role expansion. A survey of European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography. 2021;27(4):1185-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.003
Pedersen MRV, KB, Santos R, Harrison G, et al. Sonographers’ perspective on research – A worldwide online questionnaire study. Radiography. 2024;30:483-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.010
Pedersen MRV, Otto PO, Fredslund M, Smedegaard C, Jensen J, McEntee MF, Loft MK. Ultrasound assessment of testicular volume-An interobserver variability. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023;54:692-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2023.09.001
Brage K, Hjarbæk J, Kjaer P, Ingwersen KG, Juul-Kristensen B. Ultrasonic strain elastography for detecting abnormalities in the supraspinatus tendon: an intra-and inter-rater reliability study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027725. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027725
Brage K, Pank KTT, Hansen S, Sondergaard LK, McEntee MF, Pedersen MRV. Technical ultrasonic quality assurance in Danish Radiology Departments. WFUMB Ultrasound Open. 2023;1(1):100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wfumbo.2023.100005
Moore S, Reeve R. Audit in ultrasound: An introduction and overview. Sonography. 2022;9:123-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/sono.12305
Rafaelsen RS, Otto PO, Pedersen MRV. Long-term ultrasound follow-up in patients with small gallbladder polyps. Dan Med J. 2020; 67:A06200414.
Pedersen MR, Otto PO, Rafaelsen SR. Ultrasound evaluation of testicular volume in patients with testicular microlithiasis. Ultrasound International Open. 2018; 4:E99-E103. https://doi.org.10.1055/a-0643-4524
Johnson J KE, Arezina J, Bryant LD, Wallace R, Harrison G, Atik RB, Coates J, Hardicre N, Sicklen R, Lardner T, Horwood K, Beety H, Arnold J, Pollak KI. Communication coaching for sonographers (CCS): Preliminary evaluation of a novel intervention to improve unexpected news delivery. PEC Innov. 2023; 3:1002341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100231
Reeve R, Higginson A, Ball C, Beable R, Smith M. Role extension in advanced ultrasound practice: A framework approach and case study. Ultrasound. 2023; 31:4-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X221102577
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Pearson; 1985.
Bleiker J, Morgan-Trimmer S, Knapp K, Hopkins S. Navigating the maze: Qualitative research methodologies and their philosophical foundations. Radiography (Lond). 2019; 25 Suppl 1:S4-s8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.008
Harrision G, Santos R, Kraus B, Pedersen, MRV. Radiographers in ultrasound: Motivation and role expansion. A survey of European Federation of Radiographers Societies (EFRS). Radiography. 2021; 27:1185-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.003
Harrison G, Kraus B, Santos R, Noij-Rijkes S, Pedersen M. The role of radiographers in ultrasound: A survey of the national societies within the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography (Lond). 2021; 27:761-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.003
Pedersen M, Kraus B, Santos B, Harrision G. Radiographers' individual perspectives on sonography - A survey of European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography. 2022; 28:31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.018
Miles N, Cowling C, Lawson C. The role of the sonographer - An investigation into the scope of practice for the sonographer internationally. Radiography (Lond). 2022; 28:39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.017
Babington EA, Hynes C, Lawal O. Factors influencing sonographer-led bowel ultrasound services in the UK. Radiography (Lond). 2023; 29(2):385-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.01.020
Childs J, Thoirs K, Quinton A, Osborne B, Edwards C, Stoodley P, et al. Development of a professional competency framework for Australian sonographers: perspectives for developing competencies using a Delphi methodology. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022; 34. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzac017
Elliott V, Wilson SE, Svensson J, Brennan P. Research utilisation in sonographic practice: Attitudes and barriers. Radiography. 2009; 15:187-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2008.06.003
Kettlewell LS, Richards SP. A mixed-method study into obstetric sonographer-led-discharge and other forms of sonographer role extension. Ultrasound. 2022; 30:209-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X21103829
Thomas S, O'Loughlin K, Clarke J. Sonographers' communication in obstetrics: Challenges to their professional role and practice in Australia. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2020; 23:129-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12184
Tinetti C, Thoirs K, Harreveld B, Zipf R. Pilot study to identify attributes of professionalism in sonography. Radiography (Lond). 2021; 27:1135-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.06.004
Yakubu A, Briggs E, Hacking S, Akudjedu TN. Clinical audit and research in radiography practice: An exploration of the English landscape. Radiography (Lond). 2023; 29:200-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.004
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19:349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2):77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012; 40(8):795-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/140349481246503
European Federation of Radiographer Societies. EFRS White Paper on the Future of the Profession Radiographer Education, Research, and Practice (RERP): 2021-2031. 2021.
Abuzaid MM, Tamam N, Elshami W, Ibham M, Aljamal M, Khayal S, et al. Exploring Radiographers' Engagement in Research: Motivation and Barriers in Five Arab Countries. Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11:2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202735
Dirks KT. Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. J Appl Psychol. 2000; 85:1004-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.1004
Pedersen MRV. What motivates radiographers to start working with research? Radiography (Lond). 2023; 29(1):215-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.003
Sidhu PS, Ewertsen C, Piskunowicz M, Secil M, Ricci P, Fischer T, et al. Diversity of current ultrasound practice within and outside radiology departments with a vision for 20 years into the future: a position paper of the ESR ultrasound subcommittee. Insights Imaging. 2023; 14(1):202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01548-w
Reiso M, Langli B, Sommerseth E, Johannessen A. A qualitative study of the work experiences of midwives performing obstetric ultrasound in Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):641. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03333-9
Jensen J, Andersen PB, Skjøth F, Pedersen MRV. An overview of radiography research and publication productivity in Denmark. Radiography 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.012 1078-8174
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karen Brage, Susanne Holm, Svea Deppe Mørup, Malene Roland Vils Pedersen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
