University Teacher´'s Relational Competence in Online Teaching
A Microscopic Relational Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5711Emneord (Nøkkelord):
Higher education, Microsopic relational analysis (MRA), Online teaching, social bond, Teacher-student relationship (TSR), Teachers' relational comptenceSammendrag
Universities have strengthened their capacity to conduct teaching online since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet online teaching poses new challenges for teacher-student relationships (TSR). International research emphasizes the significance of TSR for learning, but there is a lack of research on how TSR is built in digital classrooms. This paper discusses teachers’ relational competence as manifested in online teaching. Microscopic Relational Analysis (MRA) was used to explore a university teacher’s relational competence, focusing on nonverbal communication. The analysis shows how changeable and vulnerable the TSR can be. This is a characteristic of TSR in teaching face-to-face, but it is hardly expected of TSR in online teaching. In addition, the study indicates that teachers’ nonverbal communication is an important feature in this context. The MRA suggests that a teacher’s sensitivity to detecting a student’s subtle cues is crucial for successful online TSR. Further, it is suggested that teachers’ relational competence is manifested along five patterns, where respectful communication during the student’s turn is essential. Overall, the study suggests the importance of teachers’ relational competence in fostering a positive and supportive digital learning environment and highlights the need for teacher training and professional development programs to enhance teachers’ relational competence in online teaching.
Referanser
Aspelin, J. & Eklöf, A. (2022). In the blink of an eye: understanding teachers’ relational competence from a micro-sociological perspective. Classroom Discourse. Online first: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19463014.2022.2072354
Aspelin, J. (2022). Microscopic Relational Analysis: A Method for Researching the Teacher-Student Relationship. International Journal of Research and Method in Education. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2042244
Aspelin, J., Östlund, D., & Jönsson, A. (2021). Pre-service educators’ understandings of relational competence. Frontiers in Education: Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678793
Bunglowala, A., & Bunglowala, A. (2015). Nonverbal communication: An integral part of teaching learning process. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, 1, 371–375.
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
Fabris, M. A., Verschueren, K., Roorda, D., & Longobardi, C. (Eds.). (2022). Student-Teacher Relationship Quality Research: Past, Present and Future. Frontiers Media, SA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/978-2-8325-0684-4
Goffman, E. (1982/1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Pantheon Books.
Goodwin, H. C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and listeners. Academic Press.
Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher-student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613
Jensen, E., Skibsted, E. B., & Christensen, M. V. (2015). Educating teachers focusing on the development of reflective and relational competencies. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 14(3), 201–212. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10671-015-9185-0
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
Karpouza, E., & Emvalotis, A. (2019). Exploring the teacher-student relationship in graduate education: a constructivist grounded theory. Teaching in higher education, 24 (2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1468319
Klinge, L. (2016). Lærerens relationskompetence: En empirisk undersøgelse af, hvordan lærerens relationskompetence viser sig i interaktioner med elever og klasser i almenundervisningen i folkeskolen (Doctoral dissertation, Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet).
Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583
Nordenbo, S. E., Larsen, M. S., Tiftikçi, N., Wendt, R. E., & Østergaard, S. (2008). Lærerkompetencer og elevers læring i førskole og skole. Et systematisk review udført for Kunnskapsdepartementet, Oslo. Danish Clearinghouse for Educational Research. Köpenhamn: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v12i23.96758
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Voorhees, M. D., Snell, M. E., & La Paro, K. M. (2003). Improving the sensitivity and responsivity of preservice teachers toward young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214030230030501
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School psychology review, 46 (3), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-2017-0035.v46-3
Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology: discourse, emotion, and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/73.1.321
Scheff, T. (1997). Emotions, the Social Bond and Human Reality. Part/Whole Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0964028200210082
Segerby, C., & Aspelin, J. (2023) How is Teachers’ Relational Competence Manifested in Online Higher Education Contexts? International Educational Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.30560/ier.v6n2p35
Skibsted, E., & Matthiesen, N. (Eds.). (2016). Relationskompetencer i laereruddannelse og skole. [Relational competence in teacher education and school; in Danish]. Fredrikshavn: Dafolo.
Song, H., Kim, J., & Luo, W. (2016). Teacher–student relationship in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.037
Zeki, C. P. (2009). The importance of non-verbal communication in classroom management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1443–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.254
Vagos, P., & Carvalhais, L. (2022). Online versus classroom teaching: Impact on teacher and student relationship quality and quality of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 828774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828774
Vega Matuszczyk, J., Johansson, K., & Schüler, M. (2020). The student learning context during a pandemic. In VILÄR. 3–4 december 2020 University West, Trollhättan (pp. 28–30). Högskolan Väst.
Vetenskapsrådet (2017). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Elanders Gotab.
Wiklund-Engblom, A. (2018). Digital relational competence: Sensitivity and responsivity to needs of distance and co-located students. Seminar.net, 14(2), 188–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2979
Wubbels, T., et al., (2012). Interpersonal relationships in education: an overview of contemporary research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Östbring. L. (2023). Långsiktiga konsekvenser av coronapandemin för undervisning och examination. (UKÄ-rapport, 2023:5).
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2024 Cecilia Segerby, Jonas Aspelin
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.