Measuring Curriculum–Assessment Regulation Coherence
Learning Outcomes–Criteria Coupling, Thematic Emphasis, and Global Discourse Alignment in Kazakhstan and Finland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6574Nyckelord:
national curricula, learning outcomes, global competence, STEM, 21st century skillsAbstract
National curricula regulate educational expectations and assessment through their statement genres and the linkage between expectations and criteria. This article compares Kazakhstan and Finland through cross-lingual computational document analysis of formal curriculum and assessment-regulation texts; it does not examine classroom assessment or implementation. Atomic normative statements were embedded and compared using directional mean-best similarity, threshold coverage, one-to-one matching, and size-matched bootstrapping. Both systems show strong internal textual coherence through different architectures: Kazakhstan exhibits close outcomes-to-criteria coupling, whereas Finland links a broader objective layer to criteria. Cross-system convergence is higher for expectations/objectives than for criteria, indicating that evaluative phrasing is more system-specific than curricular intentions. Finland shows higher semantic alignment with literacy, civic and social learning, sustainability, and inclusion frames, whereas Kazakhstan shows higher semantic alignment with digital-competence language in the assessment-related layer. The findings show that global curriculum discourses travel more readily at the level of stated aims than assessment rules, where evaluative frameworks remain less portable.
Nedladdningar
Referenser
Adam, S. (2004). Using learning outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels. United Kingdom Bologna Seminar.
All European Academies - ALLEA. (2023). The European code of conduct for research integrity (Revised ed.). https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
Baden, C., Pipal, C., Schoonvelde, M., & van der Velden, M. A. C. G. (2022). Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574
Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Borhan, H. (2025). Civic education as a pathway to inclusive societies: Exploring the role of education in fostering civic and social engagement (OECD Education Working Papers No. 326). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3f128be8-en
Clark, N., & Hsu, J. L. (2023). Insight from biology program learning outcomes: Implications for teaching, learning, and assessment. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-09-0177
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
European Commission. (2015). ECTS users’ guide 2015. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/87192
Grimmer, J., Roberts, M. E., & Stewart, B. M. (2022). Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press.
Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160
Hamdoun, W. M. A. (2023). Constructive alignment approach: Enhancing learning and teaching. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0173
Karseth, B., Bernotaite, S., & Sundby, A. H. (2024). The OECD’s narrative on the future curriculum: Issuing values. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 10(2), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2024.2361937
Law on personal data and their protection. (2013). Law on personal data and their protection - Law No. 94-V. Republic of Kazakhstan/Adilet Legal Information System. https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1300000094
Мектепке дейінгі тәрбие мен оқытудың, бастауыш, негізгі орта, жалпы орта, техникалық және кәсіптік, орта білімнен кейінгі білім берудің мемлекеттік жалпыға міндетті стандарттарын бекіту туралы [On approval of the state compulsory standards for preschool education and training, primary, lower secondary and general secondary, technical and vocational, and post-secondary education], Қазақстан Республикасы Оқу-ағарту министрінің № 348 бұйрығы [Order of the Minister of Enlightenment of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 348] (2022). https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/V2200029031
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144-181. https://doi.org/10.1086/231174
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Ni, J., Hernández Ábrego, G., Constant, N., Ma, J., Hall, K. B., Cer, D., & Yang, Y. (2022). Sentence-T5: Scalable sentence encoders from pre-trained text-to-text models. In Findings of ACL 2022 (pp. 1864-1874). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.146
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://doi.org/10.1787/54ac7020-en
OECD. (2020a). Curriculum (re)design: A series of thematic reports from the OECD Education 2030 project [Overview brochure]. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/2-1-curriculum-design/brochure-thematic-reports-on-curriculum-redesign.pdf
OECD. (2020b). Curriculum analysis of the OECD future of education and skills 2030: Technical report (OECD Education Policy Perspectives No. 106). https://doi.org/10.1787/fec47a82-en
OECD. (2025). Education policy outlook 2025: Nurturing engaged and resilient lifelong learners in a world of digital transformation. https://doi.org/10.1787/c3f402ba-en
Opetushallitus/Utbildningsstyrelsen [Finnish National Board of Education]. (2016). Perusopetuksen – Opetussuunnitelman Perusteet 2014 [National core curriculum for primary and lower secondary education 2014. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf
Орта, техникалық және кәсіптік, орта білімнен кейінгі білім алушылардың білімін бағалау өлшемшарттарын бекіту туралы [On approval of the criteria for assessing the knowledge of students in secondary, technical and vocational, and post-secondary education], Қазақстан Республикасы Білім және ғылым министрінің № 52 бұйрығы [Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 52] (2016). https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/V1600013137
Pettersson, D., Prøitz, T. S., & Forsberg, E. (2017). From role models to nations in need of advice: Norway and Sweden under the OECD’s magnifying glass. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 721-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1301557
Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007003
Priestley, M., Alvunger, D., Philippou, S., & Soini, T. (Eds.). (2021). Curriculum making in Europe: Policy and practice within and across diverse contexts. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781838677350
Siegesmund, R., & Smilan, C. (2023). Educational aims, goals, and objectives: Balancing instructional objectives and expressive outcomes. In R. Siegesmund & C. Smilan (Eds.), Authentic secondary art assessment (pp. 11-28). Routledge.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. Teachers College Press.
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
UNESCO International Bureau of Education. (2017). Prototype of a national curriculum framework: Training tools for curriculum development. UNESCO. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/108649/1/Prototype_of_a_National_Curriculum_Framework.pdf
van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Springer.
Ventista, O. M., & Brown, C. (2023). Teachers’ professional learning and its impact on students’ learning outcomes: Findings from a systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100565
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 Aliya Assylbekova, Aiman Ali

Det här verket är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.