TPACK-XD: Expanding the TPACK Framework for Metaverse-Based Higher Education Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.6205Keywords:
metaverse, curriculum, TPACK, Higher education, TPACK-XDAbstract
The integration of immersive metaverse-based environments into higher education challenges existing conceptualisations of teacher knowledge. While the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework has guided technology integration in traditional and online settings, its sufficiency for immersive higher education metaverse-based learning environments (HEMLE) remains underexplored. Grounded in a design-based research (DBR) problem-analysis phase, this qualitative study draws on expert interviews with immersive education practitioners and platform developers to identify the knowledge domains required for effective curriculum design in HEMLE contexts. Using a hybrid thematic analysis informed by TPACK, findings reveal that immersive teaching demands expanded attention to Learner Knowledge (AK), Design Knowledge (DK), and strengthened Contextual Knowledge (XK), reflecting embodied interaction, experiential orchestration, and infrastructural constraints unique to immersive environments. Based on these insights, the study proposes TPACK-XD as an extended framework that accounts for the design-intensive, contextually embedded, and learner-centered nature of metaverse-based higher education. The findings contribute to the theoretical refinement of teacher knowledge models and offer guidance for curriculum development in immersive digital learning spaces.
References
Adeoye‐Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 4(10), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441
Barr, R. (2013). Memory Constraints on Infant Learning From Picture Books, Television, and Touchscreens. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12041
Bates, A. W. (Tony). (2022). Teaching in a Digital Age: Third Edition - General. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m/
Bermejo, B., Juiz, C., Cortes, D., Oskam, J., Moilanen, T., Loijas, J., Govender, P., Hussey, J., Schmidt, A. L., Burbach, R., King, D., O’Connor, C., & Dunlea, D. (2023). AR/VR Teaching-Learning Experiences in Higher Education Institutions (HEI): A Systematic Literature Review. Informatics, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10020045
Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilising a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3D virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.031
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brianza, E. (2022). Situating TPACK: A Systematic Literature Review of Context as a Domain of Knowledge.
Brianza, E., Schmid, M., Tondeur, J., & Petko, D. (2024). Is contextual knowledge a key component of expertise for teaching with technology? A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100201
Britannica. (2023). Observable universe. https://www.britannica.com/topic/observable-universe
Britannica. (2024, March 15). Augmented reality | Definition, Examples, & Facts | Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/augmented-reality
Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2019). CHE Principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1379987
Buliva, N. (2018). Does Culture Impact Learning For Students Who Use Virtual Reality (VR) Tools? A Review of Literature. https://www.academia.edu/64303387/Does_Culture_Impact_Learning_For_Students_Who_Use_Virtual_Reality_VR_Tools_A_Review_of_Literature
Chai, C., Koh, J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 31–51.
Chan, J., & Torah, R. (2022). E-Textile Haptic Feedback Gloves for Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications. The 3rd International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles, 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022015001
Chandler, L., & Ward, A. (2019). Immersed in Design: Using an Immersive Teaching Space to Visualise Design Solutions. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12191
Chang, E., Kim, H.-T., & Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351
Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16403–16429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x
Chung, L.-Y. (2012). Virtual Reality in College English Curriculum: Case Study of Integrating Second Life in Freshman English Course. 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2012.198
Collins English Dictionary. (2023, September 17). Visible universe. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/visible-universe
Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2022). A commentary on the criteria of effective teaching in post-COVID higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2002828
Elgamal, Y. S. (2022). A New Dimension to University Education The Metaversity. 2022 32nd International Conference on Computer Theory and Applications (ICCTA), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTA58027.2022.10206345
Evans, L. (2019). Barriers to VR use in HE. In Proceedings of the Virtual and Augmented Reality to Enhance Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Conference 2018 (pp. 3–13). IM Publications Open LLP. https://doi.org/10.1255/vrar2018.ch2
Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2018). Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation (Fifth Edition). SAGE.
Green, H. E. (2014). Use of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 21(6), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.21.6.34.e1252
Guney, A., & Al, S. (2012). Effective Learning Environments in Relation to Different Learning Theories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4th WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (WCES-2012) 02-05 February 2012 Barcelona, Spain, 46, 2334–2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.480
Han, E., Miller, M. R., DeVeaux, C., Jun, H., Nowak, K. L., Hancock, J. T., Ram, N., & Bailenson, J. N. (2023). People, places, and time: A large-scale, longitudinal study of transformed avatars and environmental context in group interaction in the metaverse. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(2), zmac031. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac031
Herrera, F., & Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Virtual reality perspective-taking at scale: Effect of avatar representation, choice, and head movement on prosocial behaviors. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2189–2209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821993121
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
Imms, W., & Kvan, T. (Eds). (2021). Teacher Transition into Innovative Learning Environments: A Global Perspective. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7497-9
Jerald, J. (2016). The VR book: Human-centered design for virtual reality. Morgan & Claypool.
Kipper, G., & Rampolla, J. (2012). Augmented reality: An emerging technologies guide to AR. Syngress.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 101–111). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Marsh, C. J. (2004). Key concepts for understanding curriculum (3rd ed). RoutledgeFalmer.
Marwecki, S., Brehm, M., Wagner, L., Cheng, L.-P., Mueller, F. ‘Floyd’, & Baudisch, P. (2018). VirtualSpace—Overloading Physical Space with Multiple Virtual Reality Users. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173815
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (Second edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
Mills, K. A., Scholes, L., & Brown, A. (2022). Virtual Reality and Embodiment in Multimodal Meaning Making. Written Communication, 07410883221083517. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221083517
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Eachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Niedenthal, S., Lundén, P., Ehrndal, M., & Olofsson, J. K. (2019). A Handheld Olfactory Display For Smell-Enabled VR Games. IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISOEN.2019.8823162
Obae, C., & Alkhayat, A. (2023). Language Learning Pedagogical Affordances of the Metaverse. Conference Papers. https://tccpapers.coe.hawaii.edu/archive/2023/Obae.pdf
Padmavathi, M. (2017). Preparing Teachers For Technology Based Teaching-Learning Using TPACK. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 12(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.3.10384
Posner, G. J. (1992). Analizing the Curriculum. McGraw-Hill.
Puentedura, R. R. (2013). SAMR: Moving from Enhancement to Transformation.
Rauch, U., Cohodas, M., & Wang, T. (2009). The Arts 3D VLE Metaverse as a Network of Imagination. Innovate: Journal of Online Education. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Arts-3D-VLE-Metaverse-as-a-Network-of-Rauch-Cohodas/e3010504015d2bc63be33de5544ec2fc021062da
Read, T., Sanchez, C. A., & De Amicis, R. (2021). Engagement and time perception in virtual reality. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 65(1), 913–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651337
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds), Educational design research. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285854675
Rhode, J., & Krishnamurthi, M. (2017). From Frameworks to Practice: Selecting Technology Tools for Instructional Integration. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029387.3029396
Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4
Sala, N. (2020). Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality in Education: A Brief Overview. In D. H. Choi, A. Dailey-Hebert, & J. S. Estes (Eds), Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development (pp. 48–73). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4960-5.ch003
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (First U.S. edition). Crown Business.
Schwab, K. (2021, March 23). The Fourth Industrial Revolution [Encyclopedia]. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-2119734
Seel, N. M., Lehmann, T., Blumschein, P., & Podolskiy, O. A. (2017). Models of Instructional Design. In N. M. Seel, T. Lehmann, P. Blumschein, & O. A. Podolskiy, Instructional Design for Learning (pp. 45–107). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-941-6_3
Slater, M. (2025). A Metaverse for the Good: Exploring the Intersection of AI and the Metaverse, 2nd International Congress. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15847422
Sobota, B., & Cvetković, D. (Eds). (2020). Mixed Reality and Three-Dimensional Computer Graphics. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77405
Sun, Y., Xu, Y., Cheng, C., Li, Y., Lee, C. H., & Asadipour, A. (2022). Travel with Wander in the Metaverse: An AI chatbot to Visit the Future Earth. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP55362.2022.9950031
Sutherland, K., & Ward, A. (2018). Immersive simulation as a public relations pedagogical tool. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Immersive-simulation-as-a-public-relations-tool-Sutherland-Ward/7d649657a2a49127b663596b80aec7a1c3bdf0ea
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass.
Vasarainen, M., Paavola, S., & Vetoshkina, L. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review on Extended Reality: Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality in Working Life. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 21(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.20870/IJVR.2021.21.2.4620
Warr, M., & Mishra, P. (2022). TPACK. EdTechnica. https://doi.org/10.59668/371.9034
Weinberger, M. (2022). What Is Metaverse?—A Definition Based on Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Future Internet, 14(11), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14110310
Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cristina Obae
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.