Exploring craft practice in learning communities

Forfattere

  • Trine Møller Independent researcher
  • Kirstine Riis University of South-Eastern Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4204

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

craft practice, learning communities, neutral learning arena, craft research

Sammendrag

This paper presents an initial research project to explore what characterizes knowledge production in craft practice situated in an informal/neutral learning arena outside the education institution. The research project is carried out by craft and design researchers from Norway and Denmark. The project participants include students, academics, older generation volunteers with craft experience, freelance designers, and arts and craft persons, as well as researchers. The overall methodology is a case study approach and has references to practice-led research, participatory design research and A/R/Tography. In this paper we present the research design of the project. Along a theoretical framework consisting of research perspectives of each of our institutional traditions, we lastly discuss the challenges in engaging a neutral learning arena, throughout and as preparation for our research project.

 

Forfatterbiografier

Trine Møller, Independent researcher

PhD

Kirstine Riis, University of South-Eastern Norway

PhD, Associate Professor

Referanser

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod (2. ed.). Studentlitteratur.

Archer, B. (1995) The Nature of Research. CoDesign (January), 6-13.

Bang, A. L. and Agger Eriksen, M. (2014) Experiments all the way in Programmatic Design Research. Artifact, 3(2),2.1-2.x. https://doi.org/10.14434/artifact.v3i2.3976

Bang, A.L. (2011. Emotional Value of Applied Textiles: Dialogue-oriented and Participatory Approach to Textile Design. [PhD thesis. Design School Kolding/Gabriel, Kolding, Denmark].

Barone, T & Eisner, E. W. (2011). Arts Based Research. SAGE Publications.

Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating Design: A review of Forty Years of Design Research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793604772933739

Binder, T. & Brandt, E. (2008). The Design:Lab as platform in participatory design research. CoDesign 4(2): 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880802117113

Binder, T. & Redström, J. (2006) Exemplary Design Research. In K. Friedman, T. Love & E. Corte-Real (Eds.) Proceedings of Design Research Society Wonderground International Conference 2006.

Bloomberg, J., Gicomi, J., Mosher, A., and Swenton-Wall, P. (1993). Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brandt, E. & Binder, T. (2007). Experimental Design Research: Genealogy – Intervention – Argument. IASDR 2007 Proceedings. Emerging Trends in Design Research. Hong Kong, 12-15 November 2007.

Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without Data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530254

Candy, L. & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts, foundations and futures from the frontline. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01471

Designskolen Kolding. (2018). Knowledge Production Strategy. https://www.designskolenkolding.dk/sites/default/files/download/videnstrategi_61.pdf

Dunin-Woyseth, H,. & Michl, J. (2001). Towards a disciplinary identity of the making professions: An introduction. In H. Dunin-Woyseth & J. Michl (Eds.), Towards a disciplinary identity of the making professions. (Vol. 4, pp. 1-20). Oslo School of Architecture.

Dunin-Woyseth, H., & Nilsson, F. (2012). Doctorateness in design disciplines. FORMakademisk, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.499

Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.) (pp. 733-768). SAGE Publications.

Frayling, C. 1993. Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.

Fredriksen, B.C. (2011). Negotiating grasp: Embodied experience with three-dimensional materials and the negotiation of meaning in early childhood education. [Doctoral theses, Oslo School of Architecture and Design]. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/93056

Groth, C. (2016). Design and craft thinking analysed as embodied cognition. FormAkademisk, 9(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1481

Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1415108.doi:10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108

Irwin, Springgay & Kind. (2005). A/r/tography as Living Inquiry Through Art and Text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912. https://DOI:10.1177/1077800405280696

Kirketerp, A. (2020) Craft Psykologi. Mailand.

Krogh, P.G., Markussen, T. and Bang, A.L. (2015). Ways of drifting – 5 methods of experimentation in research through design. In Proceedings of ICoRD: International Conference on Research into Design. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India; January 7–9.

Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S., Anderssen, T., & Rygge, J. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju (3. ed.). Gyldendal akademisk.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2003). Situeret læring – og andre tekster. Reitzel.

Markussen, T., Bang, A. L., Knutz, E., & Pedersen, P. (2012). Dynamic Research Sketching: A new explanatory tool for understanding theory construction in design research. In Proceedings of the 8th International Design Research Society Conference.

Molander, B. (2015). The Practice of Knowing and Knowing in Practices. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06131-4

Møller, T & Kettley, S. (2017) Wearable health technology design: A humanist accessory approach. International Journal of Design, 11(3), 35-49. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2842/792

Møller, T. (2019a) Wearing Health Products – A wearer-led accessory approach to wearable health design. [PhD thesis. Design School Kolding, Denmark].

Møller, T. (2019b). Access through Accessories. Journal of Jewellery Research, 2(February).

Niedderer, K. (2013). Explorative materiality and knowledge: The role of creative exploration and artefacts in design research. FormAkademisk, 6(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.651

Nielsen, L. M. (2018). Building making scholarship. FormAkademisk, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3099

Riis, K. (2016). Designkundskabens DNA: Udforskning af designkunskab gennem designprocessen Mit DNA. [The DNA of design knowledge: Exploration of design knowledge through the design process My DNA.][Doctoral dissertation, Det humanistiske fakultet, Institutt for filosofi og religionsvitenskap of [Doctoral dissertation, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU]. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2393093

Scheider, B. (2007) Design as Practice, Science and Research. In Mitchel, R. (Ed), Design Research Now (pp. 81-89). Board of International Research in Design.

Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. Penguin books.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2021-05-10

Hvordan referere

Møller, T., & Riis, K. . (2021). Exploring craft practice in learning communities . FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4204