Investigating the Mechanism of the Effect of Nature-based Architectural Components on Residential Satisfaction
Emneord (Nøkkelord):Nature-based architectural components, Residential satisfaction, Housing architecture, Lifestyle, Residential needs
The development of multi-unit urban housing, especially in the metropolises of Iran, does not take into account the effects of cultural factors on the perceived quality of housing architecture. Since the community is diverse in metropolises, especially on a sub-culture scale, it is impossible to provide housing development strategies and practical actions concerning the factors related to this scale of culture. The compatibility of lifestyle at the national or structural level with housing can be considered a general strategy to solve this problem. Based on the position of nature in the foundations of the Islamic lifestyle, it is possible to accommodate humans’ significant needs through inspiration from nature. This paper intends to investigate the mechanism of the effect of nature-based architectural components (NBAC) on residential satisfaction (RS) from the Islamic lifestyle perspective to apply the findings in architectural planning and programming processes. The results demonstrate that as adherence to the Islamic lifestyle increases, residential preferences related to the formal and semantic dimensions of NBAC also increase. Qualitative deficiencies in these components cause a decrease in perceived quality and, consequently, RS. Therefore, high residential preferences regarding semantic and formal components lead to the intensification of deficiencies in qualitative perception. In such conditions, a large part of the RS is due to residents’ adaptive behaviors. Therefore, measuring RS based on accommodating residential needs cannot be considered an objective criterion to determine housing architecture quality to test the fit of housing development patterns with residential needs. This proves the necessity for the measurement of the perceived quality of housing architecture based on the main influential factors involved, which are NBAC.
Adeli, S. (2013). Nature and architecture in Islamic ontology: A survey on traditional houses of the central plateau of Iran with emphasis on four houses in Yazd, Naeen, and Kashan. Scientific Journal of Motaleate-e Tatbighi-e Honar, 3(5), 103–117. https://sid.ir/paper/205381/en
Amerigo, M., & Aragones, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0038.
Anderson, R. (1973). Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149407
Azizibabani, M., Bemanian, M., & Yeganeh, M. (2021). Investigation of the effects of applying social sustainability components on residential satisfaction. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 29(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.29.2.29217.
Azizibabani, M., & Bemanian, M. (2022). Role of the architectural application of nature in improving the quality of semantic depth in Iranian urban housing. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 30(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.30.1.30226.
Azizibabani, M., Bemanian, M., & Yeganeh, M. (2022). The effects of nature’s presence methods on accommodating residential needs from the Islamic lifestyle perspective. International Journal of Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning, 32(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.658.
Bemanian, M., & Zandi, M. (2018). Iranian housing and lifestyle. Aval va Akhar.
Berien, E. (2005). Combining nature conservation and residential development in the Netherlands, England and Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056042000308148.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction (Richard Nice, Translator). London, Routledge. (Original work published 1979)
Cardozo, R. (1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 2(8), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150182
Carlsmith, J., & Aronson, E. (1963). Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042692.
Ellis, C. D., Lee, S. W., & Kweon, B. S. (2006). Retail land use, neighborhood satisfaction, and the urban forest: An investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.004.
Fazeli, M. (2003). Consumption and lifestyle. Sobhe Sadegh Publication.
Galster, G. C. (1985). Evaluating indicators for housing policy: Residential satisfaction vs marginal improvement priorities. Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 415–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333289.
Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Rand McNally.
Hadavi, S., Kaplan, R., & Hunter, M. R. (2017). How does the perception of nearby nature affect multiple aspects of neighborhood satisfaction and use patterns? Landscape Research. 43(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1314453.
Haeri, M. (2009). House in Culture & Nature of Iran. Tehran Road, Housing & Urban Development Research Center.
Jensen, M. (2007). Defining lifestyle. Environmental Sciences, 4(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430701472747.
Kaplan, R., (1985). Nature at the doorstep: Residential satisfaction and the nearby environment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2(2), 115–127.
Kaplan, R., Austin, M., & Kaplan, S. (2004). Open space communities: Resident perception, nature benefits, and terminology problems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976380.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kearney, A. R. (2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction: Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior, 38(112), 112–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277607.
McCrea, R. (2007). Urban quality of life: Linking objective dimensions and subjective evaluations of the urban environment [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1975). A theory of family housing adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/351032.
Oliver, R L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405.
Raeisi, M. (2019). Architecture and urbanism in accordance with the Islamic lifestyle. Qom University.
Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture, architecture, and design. Locke Science Publishing Co.
Reimer, S. (1943). Sociological theory of home adjustment. American Sociological Review, 8(3), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2085080.
Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential Mobility. Free Press.
Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (1994). Service quality insights and managerial implications from the frontier. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229102.n1.
Shabani, M. M. (2016). The effect of social indicators on the residential satisfaction of the residents of the central areas of Paris. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 4(12), 51–60.
Simmel, G. (1990). The Philosophy of Money. Routledge.
Taylor, A. F., Wiley, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598301001.
Ward Thompson, C., & Aspinall, P. A. (2011). Natural environments and their impact on activity, health, and quality of life. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 230–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01053.x.
Westbrook, R., & Reilly, M. D. (1983). Value percept disparity: An alternative to the disconfirmation of expectation theory of consumer satisfaction. Ann Arbor Association for Consumer Research.
Opphavsrett 2023 Mohammadhossein Azizibabani, Mohammadreza Bemanian, Mansour Yeganeh
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Forfatteren(e) beholder sin opphavs- og kopieringsrett til eget manuskript, men gir tidsskriftet varig rett til 1) å fremføre manuskriptet for offentligheten i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, og 2) å registreres og siteres som første publisering av manuskriptet.
- Forfatteren må selv forvalte sine økonomiske kopieringsrettigheter overfor eventuell tredjepart.
- Tidsskriftet gir ingen økonomisk eller annen kompensasjon for innsendte bidrag, medmindre det er gjort særskilt avtale om dette med forfatteren(e).
- Tidsskriftet plikter å arkivere manuskriptet (inklusive metadata) i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, i minst ett dertil egnet åpent tilgjengelig langtidsarkiv for digitalt materiell, som for eksempel i de norske universitetenes institusjonsarkiv innen rammen av NORA-samarbeidet.
- Lesere av tidsskriftet kan ta utskrift av de fremførte manuskriptene under samme betingelser som gjelder ved kopiering av fysiske eksemplar. Dette innebærer at masseframstilling av fysiske eksemplar, eller framstilling av eksemplar for kommersielle formål, ikke er tillatt uten etter avtale med forfatteren(e).