From not yet knowing to achieving directionality

On the roles of materiality in multi-sited, interdisciplinary studio settings



Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Materials, interdisciplinary collaboration, ideation, interaction, studio teaching


This paper investigates the active role of materials in shaping ideation processes during interdisciplinary studio-based collaborations. Using ethnographic data collected from a graduate-level course conducted across multiple studio settings, we analysed how materiality facilitates interactions between students and studio instructors meeting for the first time when creative ideas are not yet fully formed and knowledge of unfamiliar materials is not yet embodied. The findings elucidate how certain materials are central to (1) demonstrating, (2) understanding, (3) sharing, (4) explaining, (5) generating and (6) challenging aspects related to ideation processes within such interactions. We conclude this work by emphasising the need for further research that focuses on material mediation in the context of student–instructor relationships.


Anniliina Omwami, University of Helsinki

Doctoral Researcher

Luis Vega, Aalto University

Doctoral Researcher

Varpu Mehto, University of Helsinki

Doctoral Researcher

Priska Falin, Aalto University

Doctor of Arts

Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, University of Helsinki

Professor (PhD)


Cennamo, K., & Brandt, C. (2012). The right kind of telling: Knowledge-building in the academic design studio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 839–858.

Cho, J. Y., Cho, M.-H., & Kozinets, N. (2015). Does the medium matter in collaboration? Using visually supported collaboration technology in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(4), 567–586.

Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Birkhäuser.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, (Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.

Groth, C. (2017). Making sense through hands: Design and craft practice analysed as embodied cognition [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University]. Aaltodoc.

Heiss, L. (2020). Iterative prototypes as “boundary objects”: Facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration of a modular hearing aid. Design Journal, 23(6), 865–83.

Jeong, H. (2013). Development of group understanding via the construction of physical and technological artifacts. In D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. Rosé, C. Teplovs, & N. Law, N. (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions. Computer-supported collaborative learning series, (vol. 15, pp. 331–351). Springer.

Jonson, B, (2005). Design ideation: The conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design Studies, 26(6), 613–624.

Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Kangas, K. Härkki, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2016). Textile teacher students’ collaborative design processes in a design studio setting. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 15(1), 35–54.

McMahon M., & Bhamra, T. (2016) Mapping the journey: Visualising collaborative experiences for sustainable design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 1–15.

Salolainen, M., Partanen, J., Moslemian, O., Suorlahti, E., Kiviluoma, P., & Niinimäki, K. (2017). Crossing over boundaries through experimental pedagogy. In A. L. Bang, M. Mikkelsen, & A. Flinck (Eds.), REDO: Cumulus Conference Proceedings (pp. 156-168). Cumulus Association.

Scharmer, C. O. (2000). Organizing around not-yet-embodied knowledge. In G. von Krogh, I. Nonaka, & T. Nishiguchi (Eds.), Knowledge creation: A source of value (pp.36-60). Palgrave Macmillan.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.

Sheridan, K., Zhang, X., & Konopasky, A. (2022). Strategic shifts: How studio teachers use direction and support to build learner agency in the figured world of visual art. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(1), 14–42.

Tanggaard, L. (2015). The socio-materiality of creativity: A case study of the creative processes in design. In V. P. Glaveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (pp. 110–124). Routledge.

Vega, L., Mäkelä, M., Chen, T., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2021). Moments of entanglement: Following the sociomaterial trajectories of an intersubjective studio practice. FormAkademisk, 14(2), 1–14.




Hvordan referere

Omwami, A., Vega, L., Mehto, V., Falin, P., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2023). From not yet knowing to achieving directionality : On the roles of materiality in multi-sited, interdisciplinary studio settings . FormAkademisk, 16(4).

Cited by