Capturing and Cultivating Print & Book
Craft Practices in the UK
Emneord (Nøkkelord):crafts, embodied study, research methodology, Embodied reflection, Traditional craft skills
The type of intensive training previously needed for crafts in the printing trade is now redundant, but as craft practices are added biannually to Heritage Craft’s UK Red List of Endangered Crafts, there is a pressing need to preserve skills whilst also creating and developing new methodologies for practice in the UK to ensure these crafts survive as part of a thriving cultural heritage.The Dissecting Crafts project was centred around supporting book craft practitioners (typesetters and manufacturers, a letterpress printer and a book binder) to gain insight and extend their practice. Using qualitative research methods, an embodied knowledge methodology was developed as a system of self-evaluation. A freely available online tool kit was developed from project findings to enable other practitioners at all skill levels access to the programme. Sharing the research stages sensitively with case study practitioners evidenced their connectedness with their tools and with what they make, through a process of validation that was not anticipated in the project. Unintrusive methods of documenting in-progress activities, the practitioner-researchers’ recordings of the craft participants’ experiential dialogue proved valuable for them to be able to harness and transfer their knowledge. The methodology and tool kit were extended to other maker practices with feedback types ranging from practice development, reflection skills, and articulation to validation.
Adamson, G. (2020). Thinking through craft. Berg.
Almevik, G., Groth, C., & Westerlund, T. (Eds.). (2022). Craft sciences. Kriterium. https://doi.org/0.21524/kriterium.40
Butler, A. (2019). Of ligament and ligature : A practice-led investigation of letterpress printed artists' books in the UK [Doctoral dissertation, The University of the West of England]. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.781902
Design Council. (2004). The double diamond. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/
Design Council. (2019). Framework for Innovation. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/framework-for-innovation/
Elmansy, R. (2021, February 9). The double diamond thinking process and how to use it. https://www.designorate.com/the-double-diamond-design-thinking-process-and-how-to-use-it/
Gray, C., & Burnett, G. (2009). Making sense: An exploration of ways of knowing generated through practice and reflection in craft. Helsinki University Press. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10224/4810/Kaukinen_verkko.pdf?sequence=2
Groth, C. (2016). Design- and craft thinking analysed as embodied cognition. FormAkademisk, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1481
Groth, C. (2017). Making sense through hands: Design and craft practice analysed as embodied cognition [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto ARTS Books], Helsinki. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/24839
Hambeukers, D. (2019, October, 2). The new double diamond process is here. https://medium.com/design-leadership-notebook/the-new-double-diamond-design-process-7c8f12d7945e
Heritage Crafts. (2023). Red list of endangered crafts. https://heritagecrafts.org.uk/redlist/categories-of-risk/#endangered
Jarvis, M. (2007). Articulating the tacit dimension in artmaking. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 6(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.6.3.201_1
Johannessen, K. S. (1990). Rule following, intransitive understanding and tacit knowledge: An investigation of the Wittgenstenian concept of practice as regards tacit knowing. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 2, 151–173. https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/8481
Lemon, L. (2017). Applying a mindfulness practice to qualitative data collection. The Qualitative Report, 22(12), 3305–3313. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.3161
Molander, B. (2016). The practice of knowing and knowing in practices. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06131-4
Niedderer, K., & Riley, L. (2010). Research practice in art and design: Experiential knowledge and organised inquiry. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), Article E2.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
Prior, R. W. (2013). Knowing what is known: Accessing craft-based meanings in research by artists. Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 4(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah.4.1.57_1
Suib, S., Van Engelen, J., & Crul, M. (2020). Enhancing knowledge exchange and collaboration between craftspeople and designers using the concept of boundary objects. International Journal of Design, 14(1). http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2876/897
Toom, A. (2012). Considering the artistry and epistemology of tacit knowledge and knowing. Educational Theory, 62(6), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12001
van Braak, M., de Groot, E., Veen, M., Welink, L., & Giroldi, E. (2018). Eliciting tacit knowledge: The potential of a reflective approach to video-stimulated interviewing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-018-0487-9
Westerlund, T. (2021). ‘It’s in my hands’: Analytical tools for the communication of craft knowledge. FormAkademisk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4402
Wölfel, C., & Merritt, T. (2013). Method card design dimensions: A survey of card-based design tools. In P. Kotzé, G. Marsden, G. Lindgaard, J. Wesson, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013 (Vol. 8117, pp. 479–486). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_34
Opphavsrett 2023 Angie Butler, Sofie Boons
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Forfatteren(e) beholder sin opphavs- og kopieringsrett til eget manuskript, men gir tidsskriftet varig rett til 1) å fremføre manuskriptet for offentligheten i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, og 2) å registreres og siteres som første publisering av manuskriptet.
- Forfatteren må selv forvalte sine økonomiske kopieringsrettigheter overfor eventuell tredjepart.
- Tidsskriftet gir ingen økonomisk eller annen kompensasjon for innsendte bidrag, medmindre det er gjort særskilt avtale om dette med forfatteren(e).
- Tidsskriftet plikter å arkivere manuskriptet (inklusive metadata) i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, i minst ett dertil egnet åpent tilgjengelig langtidsarkiv for digitalt materiell, som for eksempel i de norske universitetenes institusjonsarkiv innen rammen av NORA-samarbeidet.
- Lesere av tidsskriftet kan ta utskrift av de fremførte manuskriptene under samme betingelser som gjelder ved kopiering av fysiske eksemplar. Dette innebærer at masseframstilling av fysiske eksemplar, eller framstilling av eksemplar for kommersielle formål, ikke er tillatt uten etter avtale med forfatteren(e).