Miljöorganisationerna försvarar de mänskliga rättigheterna: granskning av klimaträttegångar i Finland, Sverige och Norge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/nat.5957Nyckelord:
klimatförändring, maktfördelningsläran, rättspraxisAbstract
Statistik
Referenser
Albrecht, E.; Viljanen, J. & Vaara, E. (2020). Ilmastopolitiikan hyväksyttävyys ja kansalaisosallistuminen ilmastolain uudistuksessa. Ympäristöpolitiikan ja -oikeuden vuosikirja XIII 2020. s. 369–415.
Adigun, M. (2024). A human rights approach to climate litigation before the ECOWAS court. Environmental Law Review, 26(1), s. 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529231199378
Beauregard, C.; Carlson, D.; Robinson, S.; Cobb, C.; Patton, M. (2021). Climate justice and rights-based litigation in a post-Paris world. Climate Policy, 21:5, s. 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1867047
Belinskij, A.; Vesa, S.; Leskinen, P.; Karttunen, N.; Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A. (2024). Yleisön oikeudet vaikuttaa päätöksentekoon ilmastoasioissa: päätöksenteon muuttuva legitimiteetti. Ympäristöjuridiikka 1/2024, s. 7–33.
Boshoff, E. & Damtew, S. G. (2022). The potential of litigating children’s rights in the climate crisis before the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. African Human Rights Law Journal, s. 328–361.
Bothner, F.; Töller, A. E. & Schnase, P. P. (2022). Do Lawsuits by ENGOs Improve Environmental Quality? Results from the Field of Air Pollution Policy in Germany. Sustainability, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116592
Burgers, L. E. (2020). Justitia, the People’s Power and Mother Earth: Democratic legitimacy of judicial law-making in European private law cases on climate change. Amsterdam universitet.
Colby, H.; Ebbersmeyer, A. S.; Heim, L. M. & Røssaak, M. K. (2020). Judging Climate Change: The Role of the Judiciary in the Fight Against Climate Change. Oslo Law Review, 7(3), s. 168–185. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2020-03-03
da Luz Scherf, E. & Viana da Silva, M. V. (2023). Oil giant, climate saviour, or somewhere in between? Human rights and the Norwegian climate paradox. Int.J. Public Law and Policy, s. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLAP.2023.10054627
De Lucia, V. & Solstad Andreassen, I. (2020). Climate Litigation in Norway. A Preliminary Assessment. DPCE Online, 43(2).
de Vílchez Moragues, P. (2017). Extraterritoriality and judicial review of state’s policies on global warming: Some reflections following the 2016 Scandinavian climate lawsuits. Universidad de las Ilas Baleares. Spanien.
de Vilchez Moragues, P. & Savaresi, A. (2021). The Right to Healthy Environment and Climate Litigation: A Game Changer? Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 32. s. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvac064
Eftestøl, E. (2021). Juridik och politik – vem bestämmer i miljöfrågor? JFT 2/2021, s. 140–154.
Eskander, S.; Fankhauser, S. & Setzer, J. (2021). Global Lessons from Climate Change Legislation and Litigation. Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, 2(1), s. 1–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/711306
Feria-Tinta, M. (2021). Climate Change Litigation in the European Court of Human Rights: Causation, Imminence and other Key Underlying Notions. Europe of Rights & Liberties/Europe des Droits & Libertés, (1)3, s. 52–71.
Fiorini Beckhauser, E. (2024). The synergies between human rights and the nature: An ecological dimension from the Latin American climate litigation. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 42(1), Special Issue: Theory and practice of Sustainable Development and Human Rights: Navigating Harmonious Interpretations and Creative Tensions, s. 3–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519231223672
Firat, E. (2023). Rights-based litigation in tackling climate change: Can the ECtHR be effective in protecting human rights in the context of climate change? L&JR, 14(36), s. 89–140.
Fraser, J. & Henderson, L. (2022). The human rights turn in climate change litigation and responsibilities of legal professionals. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 40(1). s. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519221085342
Halme-Tuomisaari, M. & Rapin, A. (2021). ”Minä olen joki, joki on minä” – ympäristö, ihmisoikeudet ja ontologinen muutos. Oikeus, (50)4. s. 559–569.
Hassi, S. (2018). Toimiva oikeusvaltio on myös ympäristönsuojelun edellytys. Ympäristöjuridiikka 4/2018, s. 70–75.
Heinämäki, L. (2023). Human Rights and the Environment. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 33(1/2022), s. 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvad005
Heiskanen, H.-E. (2018). Towards Greener Human Rights Protection – Rewriting the Environmental Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2367. Tampere University Press. Tampere.
Hirvonen, A. (2011). Mitkä metodit? Opas oikeustieteen metodologiaan. Yleisen oikeustieteen julkaisuja 17. Helsingfors universitet. Helsingfors.
Hollo, E. (2020). Antroposeeni ja kestävä kehitys, lisämausteena viroseeni. Ympäristöjuridiikka 2/2020, s. 3–6.
Iyengar, S. (2023). Human rights and climate wrongs: Mapping the landscape of rights-based climate litigation. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 32(2): International Climate Litigation, s. 173–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12498
Kajala, J. (2020). Kansalaisjärjestöjen osallistumisoikeuksien kehitys kansainvälisessä ympäristöoikeudessa 1970-luvulta 1990-luvulle. Oikeus, (49)2, s. 215–228.
Karlsson Niska, T. (2020). Climate Change Litigation and the European Court of Human Rights – A Strategic Next Step? Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 13, s. 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwaa028
Keinänen, A. & Väätänen, U. (2016). Empiirinen oikeustutkimus – mitä ja milloin? I Miettinen, T. (ed.). Oikeustieteellinen opinnäyte – Artikkeleita oikeustieteellisten opinnäytteiden vaatimuksista, metodista ja arvostelusta. Edita Publishing Oy.
Keller, H. & Heri, C. (2022). The Future is Now: Climate Cases Before the ECtHR. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 40:1, s. 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2064074
Kokko, K.; Kuokkanen, T. & Utter, R. (2011). Ilmasto-oikeus. Talentum Media Oy. Hämeenlinna.
Kokko, K. (2016). Ympäristöoikeuden tutkimusmetodeista Suomessa. Ympäristöjuridiikka 1/2016, s. 29–42.
Kotzé, L. J.; Mayer, B.; van Asselt, H.; Setzer, J.; Biermann, F.; Celis, N.; Adelman, S.; Lewis, B.; Kennedy, A.; Arling, H. & Peters, B. (2022). Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law. Global Policy, 15(1), s. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13291
Kreuder, T. (2023). Climate Change Litigation – A Promising Perspective? Zbornik pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 73(2-3), s. 593–625. https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.23.16
Kulovesi, K. (2024). Pariisin sopimus. I. Kulovesi, K.; Mähönen, M. & Laininen, J. (ed.), Ilmasto-oikeus. ALMA Talent. s. 191–263.
Kulovesi, K. & Mähönen, M. (2024). Globaalin ilmasto-oikeuden kehitystrendejä. I Kulovesi, K.; Mähönen, M. & Laininen, J. (ed.), Ilmasto-oikeus. ALMA Talent. s. 43–116.
Kulovesi, K. & Mähönen, M. (2024b). Ilmastolain seurantajärjestelmä. I Kulovesi, K.; Mähönen, M. & Laininen, J. (ed.), Ilmasto-oikeus. ALMA Talent. s. 461 – 481.
Lavrysen, L. (2021). Public interest litigation in Europe: the case of climate change. Thirteenth meeting of the Task Force on Access to Justice under the Aarhus Convention.
Lehtinen, S. S. (2021). Repeämä lakimaisemassa: ilmastokriisi tilallis-ajallisena kaikkeuden konfliktina. Oikeus (50)4, s. 527–549.
Lewis, B. (2021). The Potential of International Rights-Based Climate Litigation to Advance Human Rights Law and Climate Justice. I Cripps, S. (ed.), Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity. Volume 9 Issue 1. s. 1–28. Australien. https://doi.org/10.69970/gjlhd.v9i1.1213
Luporini, R. & Kodiveri, A. (2021). The Increasing Role of Human Rights Bodies in Climate Litigation. The British Academy COP26 Briefings. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacop26/9780856726767.001
Maljean-Dubois, S. (2022). Climate litigation: The impact of the Paris Agreement in national courts. The Taiwan Law Review, 324, s. 211–222. https://doi.org/10.53106/1025593132413
Mayer, B. & Asselt, H. (2023). The rise of international climate litigation. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Volume 32, Issue 2: International Climate Litigation. s. 173–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12515
Mielityinen, S. (2021). Vahingonkorvausoikeus ja ilmastonmuutos. Ympäristöjuridiikka 4/2021, s. 102–119.
Miettinen, M. (2019). Oikeusvertailua ympäristöoikeudellisissa väitöskirjoissa. Ympäristöjuridiikka 1/2019, s. 63–70.
Minnerop, P. & Røstgaard, I. (2021). In Search of a Fair Share: Article 112 Norwegian Constitution, International Law, and an Emerging Inter-Jurisdictional Judicial Discourse in Climate Litigation. 44 Fordham International Law Journal (2021), s. 847–922. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3727937
Mutanen, A. (2023). Tulevien sukupolvien oikeuksien turvaaminen suomalaisessa valtiosääntöoikeudessa. Lakimies 7–8/2023, s. 1080–1108.
Mwesigwa, S. A. K. & Mutesasira, P. D. (2021). Climate Litigation as a Tool for Enforcing Rights of Nature and Environmental Rights by NGOs: Security for Costs and Costs Limitations in Uganda. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 15(2), s. 139–149. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/2/5.
Mähönen, M. (2024). Kansalaisten osallistumis- ja vaikuttamismahdollisuudet sekä oikeussuojakeinot, teoksessa Ilmasto-oikeus (toim. Kati Kulovesi – Maiju Mähönen – Jenni Laininen). ALMA Talent 2024. s. 438–516.
Människorättscentret (2024). Ilmastonmuutos ihmisoikeuskysymyksenä – Katsaus kansainväliseen ja arktiseen toimintaympäristöön sekä saamelaisten ja muiden arktisten alkuperäiskansojen erityisasemaan. Ihmisoikeuskeskuksen julkaisuja 1/2024.
Mäntylä, N. (2011). Luonnon edustajien puhevalta. Akademisk avhandling. Acta Wasaensia nro 225. Vasa universitet
Määttä, T. (2015). Metodinen pluralismi oikeustieteessä – ympäristöoikeudellisen tutkimuksen suuntaukset ja menetelmät. I Marttinen, T. (ed.), Oikeustieteellinen opinnäyte – Artikkeleita oikeustieteellisten opinnäytteiden vaatimuksista, metodista ja arvostelusta. Edilex.
Nedevska, J. (2021). An Attack on the Separation of Powers? Strategic Climate Litigation in the Eyes of U.S. Judges. Sustainability, s. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158335
Network for Greening the Financial System (2023). Climate-related litigation: recent trends and developments. Teknisk dokument.
Norges institusjon for menneskerettigheter (2020). Klima og menneskerettigheter.
Norksa klimat- och miljöministeriet (2020). Norway’s Climate Action Plan for 2021–2030. Meld. St. 13 (2020–2021) Report on the Storting (white paper).
Nylund, A. (2019). Klima, miljo og domstoler i et komparativt perspektiv. Fauchald, Ole Kristian & Smith, Eivind 2019. Mellom jus og politik – Grunnloven § 112. Fagbokforlaget.
Otto, F. E. L.; Minnerop, P.; Raju, E.; Harrington, L. J.; Stuart-Smith, R. F.; Boyd, E.; James, R.; Jones, R G.; Lauta, K. C. (2023). Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation. Global Policy, 14(2), s. 213–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174
Parker, L.; Mestre, J.; Jodoin, S. & Wewerinke-Singh, M. (2022). When the kids put climate change on trial: youth-focused right-based climate litigation around the world. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 13(1), s. 64-89. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.01.03
Partelow, S.; Winkler, K. J. & Thaler, G. M. (2020). Environmental non-governmental organizations and global environmental discourse. PLoS ONE, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232945
Peel, J. & Osofsky, H. M. (2018). A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), s. 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000292
Pentikäinen, S. & Sorsa, K. (2022). Innovaatiomyönteinen sääntely kestävän kehityksen tavoitteiden edistäjänä – näkökulmia innovatiivisiin sääntelyratkaisuihin yrityksen ohjausjärjestelmän kehittämisessä. Edilex 2022/18.
Preston, B. (2011). The Influence of Climate Change Litigation on Governments and the Private Sector. 2 Climate Law 485. Sydney universitet. https://doi.org/10.1163/CL-2011-048
Ragnarsson, K. (2022). What can climate change litigation learn from socio-economic rights litigation? Review of European & International Environmental Law Volume 32, Issue 2: International Climate Litigation, s. 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12484
Richardson, K.; Steffen, W.; Lucht, W.; Bendtsen, J.; Cornell, S.; Donges, J.; Drüke, M.; Fetzer, I.; Bala, G.; von Bloh, W.; Feulner, G.; Fiedler, S.; Gerten, D.; Gleeson, T.; Hofmann, M.; Huiskamp, W.; Kummu, M.; Mohan, C.; Nogués-Bravo, D.; … Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2022). Litigating the Climate Emergency – The Global Rise of Human Rights-Based Litigation for Climate Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106214
Romaniszyn, A. (2020). Human rights climate litigation against governments: A comparative overview of current cases and the potential for regional approaches. McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 16(2), s. 229–269.
Rumpf, M. (2022). Climate change litigation and the private sector – assessing the liability risk for multinational corporations and the way forward for strategic litigation. I Ruppel, O.; Markus, T.; Schulev-Steindl, E.; Müllerova, H. (ed.), Climate Change, Responsibility and Liability. s. 441–490. Nomos. Austrian Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748930990-441
Savaresi, A. & Auz, J. (2019). Climate Change Litigation and Human Rights: Pushing Boundaries. Climate Law, 9(3), s. 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00903006
Savaresi, A. & Setzer, J. (2021). Mapping the Whole of the Moon: An Analysis of the Role of Human Rights in Climate Litigation. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787963
Savaresi, A.; Alabrese, M. & Scott, J. (2022). Climate Change Litigation and Human Rights: Stocktaking and a Look at the Future. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 13(1), s. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.0001
Selvenius-Hurme, L. (2019). Ilmastopolitiikka oikeudenkäynnin kohteena – onko valtion ilmastotoimien riittävyys mahdollista saattaa tuomioistuimen arvioitavaksi hallintoriitana? Oikeus, (48)1, s. 67–78.
Setzer, J.; Narulla, H.; Highman, C.; Bradeen, E. (2022). Climate litigation in Europe: A summary report for the European Union of Judges for the Environment. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Similä, J. (2021). Kestävyysmurros ja oikeus. Ympäristöjuridiikka 4/2021, s. 6–24.
Spier, J. (2020). ´The „Strongest“ Climate Ruling Yet´: The Dutch Supreme Court’s Urgenda Judgment. Netherlands International Law Review, 67(319), s. 319–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-020-00172-5
Spijkers, O. (2022). The Influence of Climate Litigation on Managing Climate Change Risks: The Pioneering Work of the Netherlands Courts. Utrecht Law Review, 18(2), s. 127–144. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.801
Tilsted, J. Peter & Bjørn, A. (2023). Green frontrunner or indebted culprit? Assessing Denmark’s climate targets in light of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement. Climate Change, 176(103). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03583-4
Torre-Schaub, M. (2021). Dynamics, Prospects, and Trends in Climate Change Litigation Making Climate Change Emergency a Priority in France. German Law Journal, 22, s. 1445–1458. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.86
Torre-Schaub, M. (2023). Climate Change Litigation and Legitimacy of Judges towards a ‘wicked problem’: Empowerment, Discretion and Prudence. French Yearbook of Public Law, 1, s. 135–164.
Turunen, T. (2023). Oikeudelliset käsitteet, sääntelyobjektit ja ympäristösääntely. Ympäristöjuridiikka 1/2023, s. 34–51.
Tvarnø, C. D. (2022). The New Ear of Climate Law in Denmark and in the EU. European Public Law, 28(1), s. 101–122. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2022006
Varvastian, S. (2019). The Human Right to a Clean and Healthy Environment in Climate Change Litigation. MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2019-09. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3369481
Viljanen, J.; Heiskanen, H. & Raskulla, S. (2016). Ihmisoikeuksien yleiset opit ja suomalainen ympäristöoikeudellinen argumentaatio. Ympäristöjuridiikka 1/2016, s. 86–109.
Viljanen, M. (2021). Antroposeenin varallisuusoikeus. Oikeus, (50)4. s. 503–526.
Voigt, C. (2021). The First Climate Judgment before the Norwegian Supreme Court: Aligning Law with Politics. Journal of Environmental Law, 31. s. 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab019
Wegener, L. (2020). Can the Paris Agreement Help Climate Litigation and Vice Versa? Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), s. 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000396
White, A. & Callaghan-White, L. O. (2021). Taking Governments to Court Climate Litigation and its Consequences. Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA). Irland.
Willers, M. (2020). Climate Change Litigation in European Regional Courts: Jumping Procedural Hurdles to Hold States to Account? I Alogna, I.; Bakker, C. & Gauci, J.-P. (ed.), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives. Brill Nijhoff. Leiden, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004447615_014
Willers, M. (2024). Rights-based Climate Change Litigation in the European Court of Human Rights. I Aristova, E. & Lim, J. (ed.). Climate Litigation in Europe Unleashed: Catalysing Action against States and Corporations. Bonavero Report, s. 62–66.
Wuolijoki, S. (2024). Oikeustieteellisen tutkimuksen trendit käytännön liikejuridiikan näkökulmasta. Lakimies 2/2024, s. 321–327.
FN:s miljöprogram (UN environment programme) 2017. The status of climate change litigation – A global review. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20767/climate-change-litigation.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
FN:s miljöprogram (UN environment programme) 2020. Global Climate Litigation Report – 2020 Status Review. United Nations Environment Programme. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Nairobi. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34818/GCLR.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
FN:s miljöprogram (UN environment programme) 2023. Global Climate Litigation Report – 2023 Status Review. United Nations Environment Programme. Columbia Law School. Columbia Climate School. Sabin Center for Climate Law. Nairobi. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/43008/global_climate_litigation_report_2023.pdf
Zahar, A. (2020). Greenpeace v. Norway: A Leakage Case Litigated as a Human Rights Case. Macquarie University. Australien. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714290
Finlands regering HE 239/2022 vp. Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle laiksi ilmastolain muuttamisesta.
Islands regering (2020). Iceland’s 2020 Climate Action Plan. https://www.government.is/library/01-Ministries/Ministry-for-The-Environment/201004%20Umhverfisraduneytid%20Adgerdaaaetlun%20EN%20V2.pdf
Climate Case Chart (2018), Armando Ferrão Carvalho and Others v. The European Parliament and the Council – “The People's Climate Case”. https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/armando-ferrao-carvalho-and-others-v-the-european-parliament-and-the-council/.
Climate case chart (3.3.2024). Greenpeace Nordic and others v. Norway. https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/greenpeace-nordic-assn-v-ministry-of-petroleum-and-energy-ecthr/
Future Round Table (20.5.2024). Magnolia Case – Youth NGOs and Individuals v. the Government of Sweden. https://futureroundtable.org/documents/2238847/0/Magnolia+case+updated+2018.pdf/09f602a1-47ad-a9dd-e935-9690f0d614b6?t=1524056549702
Haugan Holden, J. (15.8.2024). How a landmark case against Norway’s oil and gas expansion could set a global legal precedent. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/69315/landmark-climate-justice-case-norway-oil-gas-expansion-global-legal-precedent/.
Islannin hallitus (3.3.2024). Climate change. https://www.government.is/topics/environment-climate-and-nature-protection/climate-change/
Íslands Náttúruverndarsamtök (2021). Report on Iceland’s Implementation of the Aarhus Convention 2021 Reporting Cycle. <https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/Report%20INCA%202021%20Reporting%20Cycle%20to%20UNECE.pdf>. (17.9.2023)
Krisinformation 10.10.2023 (4.3.2024). Sweden’s climate goals. https://www.krisinformation.se/en/hazards-and-risks/climate-change/swedens-climate-goals
Reuters 28.4.2022. Norway asks human rights court to dismiss Arctic oil case. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/norway-asks-human-rights-court-dismiss-arctic-oil-case-2022-04-27/
Shapovalova, Daria 31.1.2024. Oil firms forced to consider full climate effects of new drilling, following landmark Norwegian court ruling. https://theconversation.com/oil-firms-forced-to-consider-full-climate-effects-of-new-drilling-following-landmark-norwegian-court-ruling-221810
Högsta domstolen i Norge 2020. Greenpeace Nordic Association v. norska olje- och energiministeriet. HR-2020-845-J.
Oslo distriktsdomstol 17.1.2024. Avgörande av besvär 34068/21.
Stockholms tingsrätt 2016. PUSH Sverige, Fältbiologerna och andra v. Sveriges regering.
Stockholms tingsrätt 2018. Magnoliamålet.
HFD 2023:62
HFD 2024:16.
Vestre Landsret 1.3.2024. Dansk Vegetarisk Forening of Klimabevægelsen i Danmark v. Danish Crown A/S.
Andra länder och internationella rättsfall:
Europadomstolen 2018. People’s Climate Case.
Högsta domstolen i Nederländerna 2019. Urgenda.
Europadomstolen 2021. Greenpeace Nordic och andra v. Norge. 34068/21.
Europadomstolen 2021. Carême v. Frankrike. 7189/21.
Europadomstolen 2021. The Norwegian Grandparents’ Climate Campaign och andra v. Norge. 19026/21.
Europadomstolen 2022. Duarte Agostinho och andra v. Portugal och 31 andra stater. 39371/20.
Europadomstolen 2022. KlimaSenirioninnen och andra v. Schweiz. 53600/30.
Europadomstolen 2022. Anton Foley och andra v. Sverige.
Downloads
Publicerad
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Terhi Talvikki Raikas
Det här verket är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Cited by
