World-Class or World-Ranked Universities? Performativity and Nobel Laureates in Peace and Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2600Keywords:
Global University Rankings, Research Quantums, Quality Higher EducationAbstract
It is erroneous to draw too many conclusions about global university rankings. Making a university’s reputation rest on the subjective judgement of senior academics and over-reliance on interpreting and utilising secondary data from bibliometrics and peer assessments have created an enmeshed culture of performativity and over-emphasis on productivity. This trend has exacerbated unhealthy competition and mistrust within the academic community and also discord outside its walls. Surely if universities are to provide service and thrive with the advancement of knowledge as a primary objective, it is important to address the methods, concepts, and representation necessary to move from an emphasis on quality assurance to an emphasis on quality enhancement.
This overview offers an analysis of the practice of international ranking. US News and World Report Best Global Universities Rankings, the Times Supplement World University Rankings, and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Academic Ranking of World Universities are analysed. While the presence of Nobel laureates in the hard sciences has been seized upon for a number of years as quantifiable evidence of producing world-class university education, Nobel laureates in peace and literature have been absent from such rankings. Moreover, rankings have been based on employment rather than university affiliation. Previously unused secondary data from institutions where Nobel peace and literature laureates completed their terminal degrees are presented. The purpose has been to determine whether including peace and literature laureates might modify rankings. A caveat: since the presence of awarded Nobel laureates affiliated at various institutions results in the institutions receiving additional ranking credit in the hard sciences of physics, chemistry, medicine, and economic sciences, this additional credit is not recognised in the approach used in this study. Among other things, this study suggests that if educational history were used in assembling the rankings as opposed to one’s university affiliation, conclusions might be very different.Downloads
Metrics
References
Academic Ranking of World Universities (2017). Retrieved 22 February 2018, http://www.shanghairanking.com
Alladin, I. (1992). International Co-operation in Higher Education: The Globalization of Universities. Higher Education in Europe, vol XVII, (4), 4–13, Unesco European Centre for Higher Education. Bucharest, Romania. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772920170402
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press.
Benneworth, P. & Sanderson, A. (2009). The Regional Engagement of Universities: Building capacity in a sparse innovation environment. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v21-art8-en
Birnbaum, R. (1989). The Cybernetic Institution: Toward an integration of governance theories. Higher Education, 18(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139183
Bleiklie, I. (2014). Comparing University Organizations across Boundaries. Higher Education, 67(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9683-z
Bologna Process (2018). European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process. Retrieved 28 February 2018, http://www.ehea.info
Bridgestock, L. (2017) World University Ranking Methodologies Compared. Retrieved 22 February 2018, https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings-articles/world-university-rankings/world-university-ranking-methodologies-compared
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (2015). Flow Charts. Retrieved 7 December 2017, http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/downloads/CCIHE2015-FlowCharts-01Feb16.pdf
Friedman, T. (2007). The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Picador.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Globalization and the Reputation Race. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671_1
Husén, T. (1991). The idea of the university. Changing roles, current crisis, and future challenges. Prospects, 21(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336059
Marginson, S. & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marginson, S. & van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544
Marginson, S., Kaur, S. & Sawir, E. (Eds.) (2011). Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific. Strategic Responses to Globalization. Higher Education Dynamics (Vol. 36). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1500-4
Martin, M., (Ed.) (2007). Cross-Border Higher Education: Regulation, Quality Assurance and Impact. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning, Vol 1. Paris: UNESCO.
Moodie, G. (2017). Unintended consequences: The use of metrics in higher education. Academic Matters, (Winter 2017). Retrieved 7 December 2017, https://academicmatters.ca/2017/11/unintended-consequences-the-use-of-metrics-in-higher-education/
Moran, P. & Kendall, A. (2009). Baudrillard and the End of Education. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 32(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270903259873
NCPRE (2018). National Center for Professional & Research Ethics, Retrieved 28 February 2018, http://ethicscenter.csl.illinois.edu
Neave, G. (1997). The European Dimension in Higher Education. Background document to the Netherlands seminar on "Higher Education and the Nation State", Center for Higher Education Policy Studies. Twente, The Netherlands, (April 1997).
OECD Higher Education Programme (2018). The Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes. Retrieved 22 February 2018, http://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/theassessmentofhighereducationlearningoutcomes.htm
Ranking Web of Universities (2018) Ranking Web of Universities Edition of 1R Semester of the Year 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2018, https://www.upc.edu/ranquings/en/upc-at-international-rankings/rankings/ranking-web-of-universities
Rothblatt, S. (2006). The modern university and its discontents: The fate of Newman's legacies in Britain and America. Cambridge University Press.
Schriewer, J. (2004). Multiple Internationalities: The emergence of a world-level ideology and the persistence of idiosyncratic world-views. In C. Charle, J. Schriewer & P. Wagner (Eds.), Transnational Intellectual Networks: Forms of Academic Knowledge and the Search for Cultural Identities (pp. 473–533). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Smith, E. (2010). Pitfalls and Promises: The use of secondary data analysis in educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(3), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00405.x
Unesco Global Education Monitoring Report (n.d.). Retrieved 22 February 2018, https://en.unesco.org/gem-report/
U.S. News & World Report Education (2017). How U.S. News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings. Retrieved 22 February 2018, https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal Attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Brian Denman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
