Conceptualizing Professional Commitment-Based School Strategy

A Finnish Perspective


  • Jan Merok Paulsen Oslo and Akershus University of Applied Sciences



school strategy, teacher commitment, community of practice, Finnish policy culture


Core values inherent in the Finnish comprehensive education system can in many respects be interpreted to cluster and cohere around a Bildung discourse, which is paradoxically seen against the backdrop of the system’s stable high rank in PISA, the hallmark of an outcome discourse. Yet the point is that within the frames of a Bildung discourse, the themes in focus for curricula go beyond basic skills with a similarly strong focus on societal values and culture. At the process level, Finland is more deeply and strongly infused with a policy culture that is more compatible with the Bildung tradition than the Anglo-Saxon outcome discourse—with its core values of organizing and leading for relations and teaching. As noted by Finnish scholars, such cultural traits of the Finnish system are viable and can be interpreted as associated with institutional path dependency, anchored in longstanding agrarian and social-democratic values. The current paper interprets these cultural traits also as manifest at the local level around a school strategy model close to the one characterized as a professional commitment strategy in the early 1990s by the American scholars Susan Rosenholtz and Brian Rowan. The purpose of the paper, however, is to advance this theoretical understanding a step further towards a conceptual model of commitment-based school strategy. This paper is, thus, a pure conceptual piece. To elaborate the early insights from the 1990s further, a case drawn from Helsinki primary school is used as an empirical illustration.


Download data is not yet available.


Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 4(2), 191–215.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teacher’s perspectives. Social Psychology of Education, 1(2), 117–145.

Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2013). The Nordic education model: 'A School for all' encounters neo-liberal policy. Dordrecht: Springer.

Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289.

Bottery, M., Wright, N., & James, S. (2012). Personality, moral purpose, and the leadership of an education for sustainable development. Education 3-13, 40(3), 227–241.

Eels, R. J. (2011). Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Doctoral dissertation. Chicago: Loyola University Chicago.

Ehrich, L. C., Harris, J., Klenowski, V., Smeed, J., & Spina, N. (2015). The centrality of ethical leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 197–214.

Harris, A. (2013). Distributed Leadership. Friend or Foe?, Educational Management & Administration Leadership, 41(5), 545–554.

Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2006). Policy Tools and Institutional Change: comparing education policies in Norway, Sweden and England. Journal of Public Policy, 26(2), 141–165.

Hjertø, K. B., Paulsen, J. M., & Thiveräinen, S. (2014). Social-cognitive outcomes of teachers’ engagement in learning communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 775–791.

Hudson, C. (2007). Governing the Governance of Education: the state strikes back?. European Educational Research Journal, 3(6), 266–282.

Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 52–74.

Kofod, K., Johansson, O., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2016). Political cultures. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain (pp. 233–263). Dordrecht: Springer.

Lahtero, T. J., & Risku, M. (2014). Symbolic leadership culture and its subcultures in one unified comprehensive school in Finland. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(5), 560–577.

Louis, K. S., & van Velzen, B. (Eds.) (2012). Educational Policy in International Contexts. Political Cultures and Its Effects. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Louis, K. S., Mayrowetz, D., Smylie, M., & Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership (pp. 157–180). Dordrecht: Springer.

Louis, K.S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. A. (2010). Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning. Final Report of Research Findings. Toronto: University of Toronto.

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 3(5), 707–750.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (2016). Directions for our investigation of the chain of governance and the agents. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 1–24). Dordrecht: Springer.

Moos, L., & Paulsen, J. M. (2014). School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer.

Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee–organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 at a Glance. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Paulsen, J. M. (2008). Managing adaptive learning from the middle. BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo. (Series of Doctoral Dissertations 4/2008).

Paulsen, J. M., Hjertø, K. B., & Thiveräinen, S. (2016). Exploring the moral and distributive levers for teacher empowerment in the Finnish policy culture. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 1–16.

Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016). External control and professional trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a Nordic research project. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 86–102.

Paulsen, J. M., & Moos, L. (2014). Globalisation and Europeanisation of Nordic governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer.

Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226.

Risku, M., Kanervio, P., & Pulkkinen, S. (2014). School Boards in Finland. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School Boards in the Governance Process. Dordrecht: Springer.

Rosenholtz, S. J. (1987). Education reform strategies: Will they increase teacher commitment? American Journal of Education, 9(5), 534–562.

Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

Rowan, B., & Miller, B. J. (2007). Organizational strategies for promoting instructional change: Implementation Dynamics in schools working with comprehensive school reform providers. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 252–297.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Education Change, 12(2), 173–185.

Sarafidou, J.-O., & Chatziioannidis, G. (2013). Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 170–183.

Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 11(4), 488-492.

Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of the level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 951–960.

Silander, T., & Välijärvi, J. (2013). The theory and practice of building pedagogical skills in Finnish teacher education. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

Simola, H. (Ed.) (2015). The Finnish education mystery. Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. New York: Routledge.

Simola, H., & Rinne, R. (2015). Education policy and contingency: Belief, status and trust behind the Finnish PISA miracle. In H. Simola (Ed.), The Finnish Education Mystery. Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. New York: Routledge.

Simola, H., Varjo, J., & Rinne, R. (2015). Against the flow: Path dependence, convergence and contingency in understanding the Finnish QAE model. In H. Simola (Ed.), The Finnish education mystery. Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. New York: Routledge.

Somech, A (2005). Teachers' Personal and Team Empowerment and Their Relations to Organizational Outcomes: Contradictory or Compatible Constructs? Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237–266.

Spillane, J. (2013). The practice of leading and managing teaching in educational organisations. In OECD (Ed.), Leadership for 21st century learning, educational research and innovation (pp. 59–82). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2009). School Principals at Work: A Distributed Perspective. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.

Sørhaug, T. (1996). Om ledelse. Makt og tillit i moderne organisering [About management. Power and confidence in modern organization]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.

Varjo, J., Simola, H., & Rinne, R. (2013). Finland's PISA results: An analysis of dynamics in education politics. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.

Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. In K. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). A social cognitive theory of organization management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384.




How to Cite

Paulsen, J. M. (2018). Conceptualizing Professional Commitment-Based School Strategy: A Finnish Perspective. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 2(2-3), 72–85.