Conceptualizing Professional Commitment-Based School Strategy
A Finnish Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2750Keywords:
school strategy, teacher commitment, community of practice, Finnish policy cultureAbstract
Core values inherent in the Finnish comprehensive education system can in many respects be interpreted to cluster and cohere around a Bildung discourse, which is paradoxically seen against the backdrop of the system’s stable high rank in PISA, the hallmark of an outcome discourse. Yet the point is that within the frames of a Bildung discourse, the themes in focus for curricula go beyond basic skills with a similarly strong focus on societal values and culture. At the process level, Finland is more deeply and strongly infused with a policy culture that is more compatible with the Bildung tradition than the Anglo-Saxon outcome discourse—with its core values of organizing and leading for relations and teaching. As noted by Finnish scholars, such cultural traits of the Finnish system are viable and can be interpreted as associated with institutional path dependency, anchored in longstanding agrarian and social-democratic values. The current paper interprets these cultural traits also as manifest at the local level around a school strategy model close to the one characterized as a professional commitment strategy in the early 1990s by the American scholars Susan Rosenholtz and Brian Rowan. The purpose of the paper, however, is to advance this theoretical understanding a step further towards a conceptual model of commitment-based school strategy. This paper is, thus, a pure conceptual piece. To elaborate the early insights from the 1990s further, a case drawn from Helsinki primary school is used as an empirical illustration.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 4(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teacher’s perspectives. Social Psychology of Education, 1(2), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334729
Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2013). The Nordic education model: 'A School for all' encounters neo-liberal policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
Bottery, M., Wright, N., & James, S. (2012). Personality, moral purpose, and the leadership of an education for sustainable development. Education 3-13, 40(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2010.512563
Eels, R. J. (2011). Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement. Doctoral dissertation. Chicago: Loyola University Chicago.
Ehrich, L. C., Harris, J., Klenowski, V., Smeed, J., & Spina, N. (2015). The centrality of ethical leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2013-0110
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed Leadership. Friend or Foe?, Educational Management & Administration Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2006). Policy Tools and Institutional Change: comparing education policies in Norway, Sweden and England. Journal of Public Policy, 26(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X0600050X
Hjertø, K. B., Paulsen, J. M., & Thiveräinen, S. (2014). Social-cognitive outcomes of teachers’ engagement in learning communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2013-0074
Hudson, C. (2007). Governing the Governance of Education: the state strikes back?. European Educational Research Journal, 3(6), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.266
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 52–74.
Kofod, K., Johansson, O., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2016). Political cultures. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain (pp. 233–263). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_8
Lahtero, T. J., & Risku, M. (2014). Symbolic leadership culture and its subcultures in one unified comprehensive school in Finland. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(5), 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0036
Louis, K. S., & van Velzen, B. (Eds.) (2012). Educational Policy in International Contexts. Political Cultures and Its Effects. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137046758
Louis, K. S., Mayrowetz, D., Smylie, M., & Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership (pp. 157–180). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_9
Louis, K.S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. A. (2010). Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning. Final Report of Research Findings. Toronto: University of Toronto.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 3(5), 707–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99355003
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (2016). Directions for our investigation of the chain of governance and the agents. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 1–24). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_1
Moos, L., & Paulsen, J. M. (2014). School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee–organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-509370-5.50005-8
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 at a Glance. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264105133-ko
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Paulsen, J. M. (2008). Managing adaptive learning from the middle. BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo. (Series of Doctoral Dissertations 4/2008).
Paulsen, J. M., Hjertø, K. B., & Thiveräinen, S. (2016). Exploring the moral and distributive levers for teacher empowerment in the Finnish policy culture. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2015-0015
Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016). External control and professional trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a Nordic research project. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-02
Paulsen, J. M., & Moos, L. (2014). Globalisation and Europeanisation of Nordic governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0_11
Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07312958
Risku, M., Kanervio, P., & Pulkkinen, S. (2014). School Boards in Finland. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School Boards in the Governance Process. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05494-0_3
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1987). Education reform strategies: Will they increase teacher commitment? American Journal of Education, 9(5), 534–562. https://doi.org/10.1086/444325
Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167356
Rowan, B., & Miller, B. J. (2007). Organizational strategies for promoting instructional change: Implementation Dynamics in schools working with comprehensive school reform providers. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 252–297. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207302498
Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Education Change, 12(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
Sarafidou, J.-O., & Chatziioannidis, G. (2013). Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541311297586
Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 11(4), 488-492.
Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of the level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 951–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004018
Silander, T., & Välijärvi, J. (2013). The theory and practice of building pedagogical skills in Finnish teacher education. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Simola, H. (Ed.) (2015). The Finnish education mystery. Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. New York: Routledge.
Simola, H., & Rinne, R. (2015). Education policy and contingency: Belief, status and trust behind the Finnish PISA miracle. In H. Simola (Ed.), The Finnish Education Mystery. Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. New York: Routledge.
Simola, H., Varjo, J., & Rinne, R. (2015). Against the flow: Path dependence, convergence and contingency in understanding the Finnish QAE model. In H. Simola (Ed.), The Finnish education mystery. Historical and sociological essays on schooling in Finland. New York: Routledge.
Somech, A (2005). Teachers' Personal and Team Empowerment and Their Relations to Organizational Outcomes: Contradictory or Compatible Constructs? Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269592
Spillane, J. (2013). The practice of leading and managing teaching in educational organisations. In OECD (Ed.), Leadership for 21st century learning, educational research and innovation (pp. 59–82). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2009). School Principals at Work: A Distributed Perspective. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. New York: Routledge.
Sørhaug, T. (1996). Om ledelse. Makt og tillit i moderne organisering [About management. Power and confidence in modern organization]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005493
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547
Varjo, J., Simola, H., & Rinne, R. (2013). Finland's PISA results: An analysis of dynamics in education politics. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy. The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. In K. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). A social cognitive theory of organization management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Jan Merok Paulsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
