Making Sense of Assignment
On the Complexity of Being a School Leader
Keywords:Assignment, complexity theory, practice-based and process research, technocratic homogenization
The primary aim of this paper is to narrow down the description of how school leaders interpret the assign-ment (the task) and identify the markers for how they look upon the conditions of doing a good job in Sweden. The aim is in the context of practice-based and process-oriented research. We use complexity and complexity theories to frame the emerging practice of leading and organizing. This is in contrast to techno-cratic homogenization—that is, law texts, steering documents, documentation, standardized methods, plan-ning, and ceremonies. A questionnaire was conducted with three open questions (n=363 out of a possible 548 participants) and four focus groups (n=21). Complexity, dilemmas, and inconsistency emerge in the respondents’ answers the closer they are to everyday action. The results show that complexity theories put focus on a conflict between the image of schools as complicated and complex. Complicated is accompanied by generalizing and weak contextualizing of control systems, standardized methods, planning, law texts, and evidence-based education—that is, the concept of technocratic homogenization. Complexity theories emphasize the life in organizations, everyday practice as leaders, and a conflict between weak and robust contextualizing from the perspective as practice-based and process-oriented research.
Agar, M. (2013). The Lively Science. Remodeling Human Social Research. Minneapolis: Mill City Press.
Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies - struggling for a closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46(2), 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024716513774
Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268353
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x
Augustinsson, S. (2006). Om organiserad komplexitet: förslag till integration av organisering, lärande och kunnande. Thesis in Arbetsvetenskap: Luleå universitet.
Augustinsson, S., & Petersson, P. (2015). On discharge planning: Dynamic complex processes – uncertainty, surprise and standardisation. Journal of Research in Nursing, 20(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987114564257
Carraway, J. H., & Young, T. (2015). Implementation of a Districtwide Policy to Improve Principals’ Instructional Leadership: Principals’ Sensemaking of the Skillful Observation and Coaching Laboratory. Educational Policy, 29(1), 230–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814564216
Cuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Epistemological and methodological bases for naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 31, 233–252.
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping Teacher Sensemaking: School Leaders and the Enactment of Reading Policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
Czarniawska, B. (2005). On Gorgon Sisters: Organizational action in the face of paradox. In D. Seidl, & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies (s. 127-144). Copenhagen: Liber.
Czarniawska, B. (2008). A Theory of Organizing. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Drysdale, L., Bennett, E., Murakami, E., Johansson, O. J., & Gurr, D. (2014). Heroic leadership in Australia, Sweden, and the United States. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2013-0128
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Ericsson, U., & Augustinsson, S. (2015). The role of first line managers in healthcare organizations – a qualitative study on the work life experience of ward managers. Journal of Research in Nursing, 20(4), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987114564258
Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (Eds). (2016). The emergence of novelty in organizations. Perspectives on process organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Heidegger, M. (2009/1962). Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hernes, T. (2009) Understanding Organization as process. Theory for a tangled world. Oxon: Routledge
Hernes, T., & Maitlis, S. (2012) Process, sensemaking & Organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmberg, I., & Tyrstrup, M. (2010). Well then - What now? An everyday approach to managerial leadership. Leadership, 6(4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010379306
Jäppinen, A.-K. (2014). Collaborative Educational Leadership: The Emergence of Human Interactional Sense-Making Process as a Complex System. Complicity, 11(2), 65–85.
Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2012) Introducing “Perspectives on Process Organization Studies”. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Perspectives on Process organization studies (p. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morrison, K. (2008). Educational Philosophy and the Challenge of Complexity Theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 19–34. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00394.x
Morrison, K. (2010). Complexity Theory, School Leadership and Management: Questions for Theory and Practice. Educational management, administration, 38(3), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209359711
Morrison, K. (2011). Leadership for self-organization: Complexity theory and communicative action. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 1(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCLM.2011.040734
Moos, L. (2010). From Successful School Leadership Towards Distributed Leadership. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), School Leadership - International Perspectives. London: Springer.
Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice Theory, Work, & Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nilsson, H. (2015). Kultur och utbildning - en tolkning av två grundskolors mångkulturella kontexter. Linnaeus University Dissertations. No 207/2015.
Norretranders, T. (2002). Märk världen. En bok om vetenskap och intuition. Viborg: Bonnierpocket.
Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (Eds) (2010). Complexity Theory and the Politics of Education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Rigby, J. G. (2015). Principals’ sensemaking and enactment of teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2014-0051
Scherp H.-Å., & Scherp, G.-B. (2007). Lärande och skolutveckling; ledarskap för demokrati och meningsskapande. Karlstad: Karlstad universitet.
Sims, D. (2003). Between the millstones: A narrative account of the vulnerability of middle managers’ storying. Human Relations, 56(10), 1195–1211. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035610002
Slater, C. L. (2011). Understanding principal leadership: An international perspective and a narrative approach. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210390061
Stacey, R. D. (2009). Complexity and Organizational Reality: Uncertainty and the Need to Rethink Management after the Collapse of Investment Capitalism. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863657
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: SAGE.
Thomas, R., & Linstead, A. (2002). Losing the plot? Middle managers and identity. Organization, 9(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840291004
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–82. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Sören Augustinsson, Ulf Ericsson, Henrik Nilsson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.