Student Teachers Promoting Democratic Engagement Using Social Media in Teaching
Keywords:democratic education, democratic engagement, teacher education, digital citizenship, social media
In this study, we address how student teachers can facilitate democratic engagement in school. The demo-cratic engagement is seen through the lenses of an increasingly digital world through which both teachers and children live in. 42 third-year student teachers systematically prepared to use social media as an illus-trative pedagogical tool in their practice placement period. By using the notions of “thin” and “thick” de-mocracy, we are analyzing student teachers’ understanding of democracy and democratic engagement. Our findings suggest that the students view democracy in a thin way, and this lack of democratic competence may influence their classroom practices as future teachers. The Council of Europe’s Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture was used to analyse the student teachers’ competence to connect the use of social media as a digital and pedagogical tool in promoting democratic engagement. The findings disclose that students vary in their capacity to make use of social media when promoting democratic en-gagement. In our closing discussion, we argue that these results, primarily, pose serious challenges for teacher education.
Angeli, C., & Ioannou, I. (2015). Developing secondary education computer science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v2no2a2
Barber, B. R. (1984/2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Beane, J. A., & Apple, M. W. (2007). The Case for Democratic Schools. In M. W. Apple & J. A. Beane (Eds.), Democratic Schools: Lessons in Powerful Education (pp. 1–29). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Biseth, H. & Lyden S. C. (2018). Norwegian Teacher Educators' Attentiveness to Democracy and Their Practices. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(2), 26-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.7.2.
Carretero, S., Vurokari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1. The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens.
Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818271
Council of Europe, & Pestalozzi Programme. (2013). The Pestalozzi Programme use of social media for democratic participation: Trainer training module series 2012/2013. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Council of Europe (2016). Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/prems-008318-gbr-2508-reference-framework-of-competences-vol-1-8573-co/16807bc66c
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. Making Social Science Matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study (ICILS2013) - International Report. Open Access: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)/SAGE Open.
Frau-Meigs, D., O’Neill, B., Soriani, A., & Tomé, V. (2017). Digital citizenship education. Overview and new perspectives. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/prems-187117-gbr-2511-digital-citizenship-literature-review-8432-web-1/168077bc6a
Gudmundsdottir, G. B. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1992). Den kvalitative forskningsprosessen. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 5, 266–276.
Hauge, T.E, Lund, A. and Vestol, J.M. (2007) (Eds.). Undervisning i endring. IKT, aktivitet, design. (Teaching in transformation. ICT, activity, design.) Oslo: Abstrakt forlag
Huang, L., Ødegård, G., Hegna, K., Svagård, V., Helland, T. & Seland, I. (2017). Unge medborgere - demokratiforståelse, kunnskap og engasjement blant 9.-klassinger i Norge (Young Citizens - understanding of democracy, knowledge and engagement among Grade 9 pupils in Norway]. The International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS 2016). NOVA-rapport 15/2017. Oslo: Veldferdsforskningsinstituttet NOVA/ Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus
Jensen, M. J., Jorba, L., & Anduiza, E. (2012). Introduction. In E. Anduiza, M. J. Jensen & L. Jorba (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide: A comparative study (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108881.001
Jorba, L., & Bimber, B. (2012). The impact of digital media on citizenship from a global perspective. In E. Anduiza, M. J. Jensen & L. Jorba (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide: A comparative study (pp. 16–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108881.002
Koch, S. K., & Sevik, K. (2013). ‘Min stemme’ – a collective effort for developing web-based content for teaching and learning about democracy and democratic values in Norwegian schools and kindergartens. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(1–2), 126–132.
Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technoloigcal pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70.
Krokan, A. (2012). Smart læring: Hvordan IKT og sosiale medier endrer læring. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Letnes, Mari-Ann (2014). Digital dannelse i barnehagen: Barnehagebarns meningsskaping i arbeid med multimodal fortelling. Trondheim: NTNU. Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/270339
Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking Democracy? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757–769.
Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 281–299.
Mason, L. E. (2015) Media and Democracy. Democracy and Education, 33(1), 1–4.
Marichal, J. (2012). Facebook democracy: The architect of disclosure and the threat to public life. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Mikkelsen, R., Buk-Berge, E., Ellingsen, H., Fjeldstad, D., & Sund, A. (2001). Demokratisk beredskap og engasjement hos 9. klassinger i Norge og 27 andre land: Civic Education Study Norge 2001 [Democratic preparedness and commitment in Grade 9 students in Norway and 27 other countries: Civic Education Study Norway 2001]. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Universitetet i Oslo.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Ministry of Education and Research. (1998). Opplæringsloven [Education Acti]. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet Retrieved from http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-19980717-061.html.
Ministry of Education and Research. (2004). F-13-04 Kunnskapsløftet [Knowledge promotion]. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/ufd/rus/2004/0016/ddd/pdfv/226866-rundskriv_kunnskapsloftet.pdf.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2005). National curriculum for knowledge promotion. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/Core-Curriculum-in-five-languages/.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for basic skills. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2013). Framework for the teacher’s professional digital competence. Retrieved from: https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/profesjonsfaglig-digital-kompetanse/rammeverk-larerens-profesjonsfaglige-digitale-komp/kompetanseomradene/
OECD. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. Retrieved from Paris: www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
Papacharissi, Z. A. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pickering, A. og Guzik, K. 2008. The mangle in practice: Science, society, and becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390107
Parker, R., & Fraillion, J. (2016). Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics (SEA-PLM): Global citizenship domain assessment framework. Retrieved from Melbourne, AU: http://research.acer.edu.au/ar_misc/20.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., & Agrusti, G. (2016). IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 (ICCS2016) - Assessment Framework. Open Access: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39357-5
Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Books.
Sevincer, V., Biseth, H. & Vaagan, R.W. (2018). Faktuell – Youths as journalists in online newspapers and magazines in Norway. In: Y. Andersson, U. Dalquist & J. Ohlsson (Eds.), Youth and news in a digital media environment: Nordic-Baltic Perspectives, pp. 29–38. Swedish Media Council/University of Gothenburg: NORDICOM
Shaw, M. & Crowther, J. (2014). Adult education, community development and democracy: Renegotiating the terms of engagement. Community Development Journal, 49(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bst057
Shirazi, F., Ngwenyama, O., & Morawczynski, O. (2010). CT expansion and the digital divide in democratic freedoms: An analysis of the impact of ICT expansion, education and ICT filtering on democracy. Telematics and Informatics, 27(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.05.001
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Søby, M. (2015). Digital competence - a password to a new interdisciplinary field. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(Jubileumsnummer), 4–7.
Tømte, C., A. Kårstein, and D. S. Olsen. 2013. IKT i lærerutdanningen. På vei mot profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse? [ICT in Teacher Education. On the Way to Professional Digital Competence]. Oslo: NIFU.
UN. (1948). Universal Declaration on Human Rights. New York: United Nations, General Assembly Retrieved from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.
Voogt, J. & Roblin, N.P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Westheimer, J. (2015). What kind of citizen? Educating our children for the common good. New York: Teachers College Press.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004a). Educating the "good" citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. PSOnline.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004b). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Education Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
Yin, R. 2009. Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Inc.
Zinger, D., Tate, T. & Warschauer, M. (2018). Learning and teaching with technology: Technological pedagogy and teacher practice. In D. J. Clandinin & Jukka Husu (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 577–593). London: SAGE.
Zyngier, D. (2012). Rethinking the thinking on democracy in education: What are educators thinking (and doing) about democracy? Education Sciences, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educ2010001
Wistrøm, Ø. & Madsen, J. (2018). Democracy and science: two sides of the same coin? Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 4, pp. 50-68. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v4.559.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Heidi Biseth, Janne Madsen, Ingrid Reite Christensen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.