Talking About Sustainability in Teacher Preparation in Finland and the United States

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3302

Keywords:

Teacher preparation; popularization of scientific concepts; science teacher preparation; mathematics teacher preparation; sustainability; Finland; United States

Abstract

This article reports on empirical research findings from a case study of teacher education in Finland and the United States. A sociological perspective was deployed for investigating how the concept of sustainability was addressed in two teacher education programs. One of the programs was located in Finland and the other in the US. The study was carried out in 2015 and 2016. Seventeen semi-structured, open-ended, audio-recorded interviews form the core of the research materials. A thematic analysis of interviews was conducted for identifying articulations related to sustainability in subject-matter specialized teacher preparation. Findings from this study contribute to research on teacher preparation. Notably, by articulating how context-specific culture and social norms contribute to local models of teacher education. Findings from this study indicate that teacher training practices in Finland have encouraged students to articulate sustainability in relation to critical thinking, whereas in the US, sustainability has been articulated in relation to social justice. The key point supported by the evidence is that sustainability was by teachers and teacher educators conceptualized as being about the popularization of knowledge about ecology and biodiversity. The kind of communication that was by teachers and teacher educators described as effective for popularizing knowledge about scientific phenomena were forms of teaching that expanded on content-specific knowledge by connecting it to ethical and civic frameworks of the societies in which students live.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Susan Wiksten, University of California Los Angeles

Lecturer, UCLA International Institute.

References

Andrews, P., Atkinson, L., Ball, S., & et al. (2014, May 6). OECD and Pisa tests are damaging education worldwide—Academics. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics

Archer, M. S. (1996). Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge England ; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Bamber, P. (Ed.). (2019). Teacher Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship: Critical Perspectives on Values, Curriculum and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427053

Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. Los Angeles: Sage.

Bernstein, B. (1977). Class, Codes and Control: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmission (Vol. 3). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bullock, E. (2017). Only STEM Can Save Us? Examining Race, Place, and STEM Education as Property. Educational Studies, 53(6), 628–641.

Burridge, P., Carpenter, C., Cherednichenko, B., & Kruger, T. (2010). Investigating Praxis Inquiry within Teacher Education Using Giddens’ Structuration Theory. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382591003300103

Carson, R. (1998). The Edge of the Sea. New York: First Mariner Books.

Civil, M., & Planas, N. (2009). Latino/a Immigrant Parents’ Voices in Mathematics Education. In Immigration, Diversity, and Education (pp. 130–150). New York: Routledge.

Dale, R. (2005). Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education, 41(2), 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500150906

De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.

Diemer, A., Marquat, C. (Eds.). (2014). Education au développement durable: Enjeux et controverses. Brussels: De Boeck Supérieur.

Durkheim, É. (1919). Les Règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Librarie Félix Alcan.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Handbook of research on teaching. Washington: American Educational Research Association.

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and Writing the World With Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice. New York: Routledge.

Gutstein, E. (2013). Rethinking Mathematics: Teaching Social Justice by the Numbers. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Rethinking Schools Ltd.

Lightbody, P. & Durndell, A. (2006). Gendered Career Choice: Is sex‐stereotyping the cause or the consequence? Educational Studies, 22(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569960220201

Lönnrot, E. (1995). Kalevala. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura [Society of Finnish Literature].

Misiaszek, G. W. (2018). Educating the Global Environmental Citizen: Understanding Ecopedagogy in Local and Global Contexts. New York: Routledge.

Norén, E. (2011). Students’ mathematical identity formations in a Swedish multilingual mathematics classroom. Nordic Studies in Matematics Education, 16(1–2), 95–113.

Pain, R., Finn, M., Bouveng, R., & Ngobe, G. (2013). Productive tensions—Engaging geography students in participatory action research with communities. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.696594

Sant, E., Davies, I., Pashby, K., & Shultz, L. (2018). Global Citizenship Education: A Critical Introduction to Key Concepts and Debates. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Seidman, I. (2005). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (3 edition). New York: Teachers College Press.

Skinner, Q. (2002). Interpretation, Rationality and Truth. Interpretation and the Understanding of Speech Acts. In Visions of Politics. Regarding Method. (Vol. 1, pp. 27–56, 103-27.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Primary school leadership practice: How the subject matters. School Leadership & Management, 25(4), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13634230500197231

Tan, M. (2011). Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401153

Wiksten, S. (2013). A comparison of education policy frameworks for compulsory schooling in Finland, Sweden and France. La Sorbonne, Paris V.

Wiksten, S. (2018). Teacher Training in Finland: A Case Study. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1kk7c3bz

Wiksten, S. (2017). Global Citizenship Education: A comparative political economy of education perspective. In By The People: Participatory democracy, civic engagement and citizenship education. (pp. 307–322). Retrieved from https://spa.asu.edu/sites/default/files/2017-12/bythepeople_final.pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-12-09

How to Cite

Wiksten, S. (2019). Talking About Sustainability in Teacher Preparation in Finland and the United States. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 3(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3302