The dilemma of teaching with digital technologies in developing countries: Experiences of art and design teacher educators in Uganda
Keywords:digital technology; art and design; teacher education
This case study explores how teacher educators use digital technologies in teaching Art and Design (A&D) in a developing country. It uses semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations to gather qualitative data from teacher educators at two teacher training institutions in central Uganda. To understand the actual use of technologies by teacher educators in the A&D classroom, analysis of the data employed concepts from van Dijk’s resources and appropriation theory (RAT) and Mishra and Koehler’s TPACK framework. The findings indicate that low digital competence among teacher educators and insufficient access to appropriate hardware, software and the Internet means that A&D teacher educators in Uganda only occasionally use digital technologies in the classroom. Instead, teacher educators use non-professional software such as Microsoft Office to teach Art and Design subjects. The findings further confirm teacher educators’ limited awareness of the relationship between technology, pedagogy and content knowledge in the Art and Design classroom. Insufficient access to adequate digital resources, skills and knowledge explains the low creative use of digital technologies in teaching A&D lessons.
Acılar, A. (2011). Exploring the Aspects of Digital Divide in a Developing Country. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology., 8, 231-244. Retrieved May 2019, from http://iisit.org/Vol8/IISITv8p231-244Acilar248.pdf https://doi.org/10.28945/1415
Andema, S., Kendrick, M., & Norton, B. (2013). Digital literacy in Ugandan teacher education: Insights from a case study. Reading & Writing, 4(1), 1-8. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v4i1.27
Apau, S. K. (2017). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Preparedness ofStudent-Teachers of the Department of Arts and Social SciencesEducation of University of Cape Coast. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(10), 167-181. Retrieved May 2019, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139820.pdf
Appiah, E., & Cronjé, J. C. (2012). Thumbnail sketches on idea development: The drawing board vs computer generation. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 11(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.11.1.49_1
Archambault, L., & Barnett, J. (2010). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 Online Distance Educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 71-88. Retrieved May 2019, from https://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/examining-tpack-among-k-12-online-distance-educators-in-the-united-states/
Barriball, K., & White, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. lournal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 328-335. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x
Black, J., & Browning, K. (2011). Creativity in Digital Art Education Teaching Practices. Art Education, 19-34. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2011.11519140
Bolujide, O. G. (2016). Preponderance of ICT in Fine Art (Visual Art) Teaching and Learning in Nigeria. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(3), 1-15. Retrieved May 2019, from http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Preponderance-of-ICT-in-Fine-Art-Visual-Art-Teaching-And-Learning-In-Nigeria.1.pdf
Brinkerhoff, J. (2006). Effects of a long-duration, professional development academy on technology skills, computer self-efficacy, and technology integration and beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 22-43. Retrieved May 2019, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ768867.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782471
Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal, 204(8), 429-432. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design:Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
Delacruz, E. (2004). Teachers' working conditions and the unmet promise of technology. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 46(1), 6-19. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2004.11650065
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qulitative research. (3rd ed.). London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies', Learning to Teach in the Primary School,. Australia: Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved May 2019, from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1413&context=asdpapers
Freire, M., & McCarthy, E. (2014). Four approaches to new media art education. Art Education, 67(2), 28-31. Retrieved May 2019, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519262
Fuchs, C., & Horak, E. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 25, 99–116. Retrieved May 2019, from http://gunkelweb.com/coms647/texts/digital_divide_africa.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2006.06.004
Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ Use of Technology and Constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science., 4, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.07
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
Glenna, B. O. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
Hardman, J. (2005). An exploratory case study of computer use in a primary school mathematics classroom: New technology, new pedagogy? Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 99-111. Retrieved May 2019, from http://www.health.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/104/Hardman.pdf
Kampouropoulou, M., Athanasiadis, I., & Stefos, E. (2011). Students’ Views on the Use of New Technologies in Art Education: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Higher Education. Review of European Studies, 3(1), 60-70. Retrieved May 2019, from www.ccsenet.org/res https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v3n1p60
Kawulich, B. (2005). Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method [81 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art.43. Retrieved May 2019, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502430.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Bouck, E., DeSchryver, M., Kereluik, K., Shin, T., & Wolf, L. (2011). Deep-play: Developing TPACK for 21st century teachers. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 146-163. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2011.042646
Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Teachers and Teacher Educators. Common wealth Education Media Center for Asia, 1-8. Retrieved May 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267028784_The_Technological_Pedagogical_Content_Knowledge_Framework_for_Teachers_and_Teacher_Educators https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2011.042646
Kotrlik, J. W., & Redmann, D. H. (2009). Technology Adoption for Use in Instruction by Secondary Technology Education Teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), 44-59. Retrived May 2019, from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v21n1/pdf/kotrlik.pdf https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v21i1.a.3
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks London : Sage Publications.
Lemon, N. (2015). Integrating digital technology into the K-12 classroom: Arts Education Insights. In N. Lemon, Revolutionizing Arts Education in K-12 Classrooms through Technological Integration. (pp. xiii -xxii). Chocolate Avenue Hershey PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8271-9
Lin, C. (2011). A Learning Ecology Perspective: School Systems Sustaining Art Teaching with Technology. Art Education, 64(4), 12-18. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2011.11519131
Luwangula, I. (2011). Equipping Teachers with ICT Skills for Pedagogical Integration in Uganda: An Evaluation of Policy Implementation in Jinja Municipality. Shanghai,China: East China Normal University (International Center of Teacher Education). Retrieved May 2019, from https://www.grin.com/document/200562
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.) . Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record., 108(6), 1017-1054. Retrieved May 2019, from http://one2oneheights.pbworks.com/f/MISHRA_PUNYA.pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Onwuagboke, B. B., Singh, T. K., & Fook, F. S. (2015). Integrating Technology in Art Education in Nigerian Education System: The Need for an Effective Pedagogical Approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p184
Örtegren, H. (2012). The scope of digital image media in art education. Computers & Education, 59, 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.021
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Factors Influencing Integration of ICT in Higher Education in Vietnam. . In Z. J. Abas, & J. Luca (Ed.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010-Global Conference on Learning and Technology. (pp. 916-924). Penang, Malaysia.: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved 11 14, 2018, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/34284/
Phelps, R., & Maddison, C. (2008). ICT in the secondary visual arts classroom: A study of teachers' values, attitudes and beliefs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 1-14. Retrieved May 2019, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/phelps.html https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1226
Salavat, S. (2016). Use of Digital Technologies in Education: The Complexity of Teachers’ Everyday Practice. Linnaeus University, Department of Informatics. Växjö, Sweden: Linnaeus University Press. Retrieved May 2019, from http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1039657/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Trainin, G., & Friedrich, L. A. (2014). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teacher Preparation: Impact of Coaching Professional Development and Mobile Devices. American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Education and Human Sciences, College of (CEHS). Retrieved May 2019, from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsgpirw/29/
Tusiime, W., Johannesen, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. (2019). Developing Teachers’ Digital Competence: Approaches for Art and Design Teacher Educators in Uganda. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 15(1), 133-149. Retrieved May 2019, from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=2556
Uganda. (2014). National Information and Communications Technology Policy for Uganda. Kampala: Ministry of Information and Communications Technology. Retrieved May 2019, from http://ict.go.ug/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ICT_Policy_2014.pdf
UNESCO. (2002). Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher Education: A Planning Guide. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved May 2019, from http://www.eldis.org/document/A10695
van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. . Thousand Oaks : Sage.
van Dijk, J. (2017). Digital Divide: Impact of Access. (P. Rössler, Ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects., 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043
Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2011). Integrating Technology in Teaching and Teacher Education: Implications for Policy and Curriculum Reform. International Council for Education Media, 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980110041944
Wood, J. (2004). Open minds and a sense of adventure: how teachers of art & design approach technology. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23(2), 179–191. Retrieved May 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2004.00396.x
Wood, R., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Online data collection from gamblers: Methodological issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9055-y
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research:Design and Methods. London: Sage.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Wycliff Edwin Tusiime, Monica Johannesen, Gréta Björk Guðmundsdóttir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.