Under What Conditions Do Rural Schools Learn From their Partners?
Exploring the Dynamics of Educational Infrastructure and Absorptive Capacity in Inter-Organisational Learning Leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3368Keywords:
district leadership, school leadership, inter-organisational learning, capacity building, educational infra-structureAbstract
This case study was designed to explore the strategies and actions that high performing schools with sustainable results employ at the district level in a rural part of Norway. The district subjected to the study is characterised by small municipalities and a scattered population, with a few small school administrative units, which might be a challenging context for sustainability and improvement. In response, the districts developed collaborative structures to increase collective learning capacity. The research design involved a collective case study, and it draws on data from interviews with school leaders at the municipal level and local school policy documents. The findings suggest that Norwegian school district actors can facilitate school improvement by shaping collaborating cultures, inter-organisational learning processes and educational infrastructures. Furthermore, the findings highlight the schools’ ability to recognise and value new knowledge from external sources, such as academic institutions and partner schools, assimilate novelties across boundaries and, eventually, utilise these for strategic or operational ends to enhance an organisation’s absorptive capacity. Finally, the findings indicate that superintendents can play important roles through boundary-spanning and gatekeeping activities.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aas, M., & Paulsen, J. M. (2019). National strategy for supporting school principal’s instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 540–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0168.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Crossan, M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.
Crossan, M., Maurer, C. C., & White, R. E. (2011). Reflections on the 2009 AMR Decade Award: Do we have a theory of organizational learning? Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 446–460.
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (2001). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. In K. E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization (pp. 241–258). Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Directorate for Education and Training. (2017). Skoleporten.no (The School Portal). Directorate of Education. Retrieved from https://skoleporten.udir.no/
DuFour, R., & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677–690.
Echazarra, A., & Radinger, T. (2019). Learning in rural schools. Insights from PISA, TALIS and the literature. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/8b1a5cb9-en
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128–146.
Farrell, C. C., Coburn, C. E., & Chong, S. (2018). Under what conditions do school districts learn from external partners? The role of absorptive capacity. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 955–994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218808219.
Hjertø, K., B, Paulsen, J., Merok, & Thiveräinen, S. (2014). Social-cognitive outcomes of teachers' engagement in learning communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 775–791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2013-0074
Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., Jakopovic, P., & Heaton, R. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 114(2), 200–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/671935.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju (The qualitative research interview) (3. utg.). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
Langfeldt, G. (2015). Skolens kvalitet skapes lokalt. Presentasjon av funn fra forskningsprosjektet lærende regioner (The school's quality is created locally. Presentation of findings from the research project learning regions). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Leithwood, K. (2000). Understanding schools as intelligent systems. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340. DOI: www.jstor.org/stable/2083321.
Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. (2011). Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22(1), 81–98.
Louis, K. S. (2015). Linking leadership to learning: State, district and local effects. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 7–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30321
Louis, K. S., & Murphy, J. (2017). Trust caring and organizational learning: The leader's role. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 103–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0077
Louis, K. S., Thomas, E., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). How do states influence leadership in small districts? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 328–366. DOI: 10.1080/15700761003731518
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35 (Supplemental), 707–750.
McIver, D., Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Ramachandran, I. (2013). Understanding work and knowledge management from a knowledge-in-practice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 597–620.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (2016). Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6.
OECD. (2013). Leadership for 21st-century learning. Paris: OECD publishing.
OECD. (2018). Responsive school systems. Connecting facilities, sectors and programmes for student success. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Paulsen, J. M. (2014). Norwegian superintendents as mediators of change initiatives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13, 407–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945654.
Paulsen, J. M. (2019). Strategisk skoleledelse (Strategic school leadership) (1. utgave). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Paulsen, J. M., & Henriksen, Ø. (2017). Mediation, collaborative learning and trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a Nordic Research Project. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1), 68–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1952
Paulsen, J. M., & Hjertø, K., B. (2019). Strengthening school principals’ professional development through effective school ownership in Norwegian municipalities. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(5), 939–953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2017-0221.
Paulsen, J. M., & Hjertø, K., B. (2014). Exploring individual-level and group-level levers for inter-organizational knowledge transfer. The Learning Organization, 21(4), 274–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2013-0044.
Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016). Norwegian superintendents are mediators in the governance chain. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing, 99–138.
Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Nihlfors, E., Moos, L., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822.
Roald, K. (2012). Kvalitetsvurdering som organisasjonslæring(Quality assessment as organizational learning). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Roald, K., Andreassen, R. A., & Ekholm, M. (2012). Teoretisk dokument for arbeid med organisasjonslæring (Theoretical document for work with organizational learning). Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/globalassets/upload/ungdomstrinnet/rammeverk/ungdomstrinnet_bakgrunnsdokument_organisasjonslaring_vedlegg_6.pdf
Schechter, C. (2008). Organizational learning mechanisms: The meaning, measure, and implications for school improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 155–186.
Schechter, C., & Asher, N. (2012). Principals’ sense of uncertainty and organizational learning mechanisms. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(2), 138–115.
Schechter, C., & Mowafaq, Q. (2013). From illusion to reality: Schools as learning organizations. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(5), 505–516.
Shirrell, M., Hopkins, M., & Spillane, J. P. (2019). Educational infrastructure, professional learning, and changes in teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs. Professional Development in Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452784.
Sigurðardóttir, S., Sigurðardóttir, A., & Hansen, B. (2018). Educational leadership at municipality level: Defined roles and responsibilities in legislation. Nordisk Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 2, 56–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2760.
Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613–642.
Spillaine, J. (2013). The practice of leading and managing teaching in educational organisations. In OECD (Ed.), Leadership for 21st century learning, educational research and innovation (pp. 59–82). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2018). School district educational infrastructure and change at scale: Teacher peer interactions and their beliefs about mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 532–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217743928.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Statistics Norway. (2017). Official statistics about Norwegian society since 1876. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/en/
Steffensen, K., Ekren, R., Zachrisen, O. O., & Kirkebøen, L. J. (2017). Er det forskjeller i skolers og kommuners bidrag til elevenes læring i grunnskolen? En kvantitativ studie. (Are there differences in the contribution of schools and municipalities to the pupils' learning in primary school? A quantitative study). Retrieved from: https://www.ssb.no/utdanning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/er-det-forskjeller-i-skolers-og-kommuners-bidrag-til-elevenes-laering-i-grunnskolen
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2391875?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Weick, K. E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(10), 673–676.
Weick, K. E. (2001). Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In K. E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization: Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 380-403.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Hilde Forfang, Jan Merok Paulsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
