Different dimensions of knowledge in teacher education - a general typification
Keywords:knowledge types, teacher education, professional knowledge, typification, teacher knowledge
The paper presents a typology of dimensions of ‘knowledge’ related to teacher education and professional practice. It departs from the observation that this theme is determined in many different ways and as a whole seems very difficult to capture. The purpose is to contribute to further clarification. Three dimensions of teacher knowledge are presented: 1) Ways of handling knowledge, 2) Modes of knowledge, and 3) Knowledge in a content perspective. Referring to the first dimension, it is emphasized that student teachers need to develop both a critical consciousness of knowledge, as well as abilities for enacting knowledge and for constructing knowledge. ‘Enacting knowledge’ includes taking different perspectives and using various types of knowledge to understand and handle a professional situation. ‘Constructing knowledge’ refers, for example, to student teachers researching professional challenges. Dimension 2 focuses on different modes in which teacher knowledge can appear with the subcategories global evidence, local ‘evidence’, and theory and philosophy. Dimension 3 refers to knowledge in a content perspective, with an open list of typical content in teacher education. The potentials and perspectives of this typology are discussed, including examples of how it can be used and also reference to professional knowledge and professionalism.
Ben-Peretz, M. (2011). Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.015
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
Carlson, J., & Daehler, K. R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77-92). Springer.
Carr, D. (2014). Professionalism, profession and professional conduct: Towards a basic logical and ethical geography. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning, (pp. 5 - 27). Springer.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. The later works of John Dewey, Vol. 8. DC Heath.
Edwards, A., & Daniels, H. (2012). The knowledge that matter in professional practices. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644904
Ellis, V. (2016). The challenge of transformation: Å arbeide med kunnskapsproblemet i lærerutdanningen. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2866
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Gilje, N. (2017) Profesjonskunnskabens elementære former. In S. Mausethagen, (Ed.) Kvalifisering til profesjonel yrkesutførelse (pp. 21-33). Universitetsforlaget.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). Routledge.
Grimen, H. (2008). Profesjon og kunnskap. In A. Molander, & L. I. Terum (Eds), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 71-86). Universitetsforlaget.
Grimen, H., & Molander, A. (2008). Profesjon og skjønn. In A. Molander, & L.I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 179-196). Universitetsforlaget.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. The Higher Education Academy.
Hermansen, H., & Mausethagen, S. (2016). Når kunnskap blir styrende: Læreres rekontekstualisering av nye kunnskapsformer. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 92-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/adno.2467
Hovdenak, S. S., & Wiese, E. (2017). Fronesis: Veien til profesjonell lærerutdanning? Uniped., 40(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2017-02-06
Keiding, T. B., & Qvortrup, A. (2014). Systemteori og didaktik. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Kinsella, A. E., & Pitman, A. (2012). Phronesis as professional knowledge – practical wisdom in the professions. Sense Publishers.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
Knudsen, L. E. D. (2012). Teori og praksis i læreruddannelsen – kundskabsformer, kultur og kropslighed. PhD thesis, Aarhus University.
Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2017). Lærerutdanning som profesjonsutdanning - Forutsetninger og prinsipper fra forskning. Et kunnskapsgrunnlag. Kunnskapssenter for utdanning.
Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 23(6), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902822942
Lund, J. H. (2013). New forms of governance in the Danish School: A study about teachers’ meaning making of the ministerial order about student plans in a suborganizational perspective based on sociology of knowledge and phenomenology. PhD thesis, University of Aarhus.
Lykke, N., Markussen, R., & Olesen, F. (2000). “There are always more things going on than you thought!” Methodologies as Thinking Technologies. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 4. Interview with Donna Haroway.
Markauskaite, L., & Goddyear, P. (2014). Professional work and knowledge. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning (pp. 79 - 106). Springer.
McGarr, O., O’Grady, E., & Guilfoyle, L. (2017). Exploring the theory-practice gap in initial teacher education: Moving beyond questions of relevance to issues of power and authority. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(1), 48-60.
Menter, I. (2016). Helga Eng lecture 2015: What is a teacher in the 21st century and what does a 21st century teacher need to know? Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 11-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/adno.2647
Munthe, E., & Haug, P. (2010). En integrert, profesjonsrettet og forskningsbaseret grunnskolelærerutdanning. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 94, 188-202.
Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.006
Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., &Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates’ approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.004
Quine, W.van O. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20-43.
Raaen, F. D. (2018). Hva slags vitenskapelighet trenger profesjonsutøvere? Lærerutdanningen som case. Tidsskriftet Bedre Skole, 2.
Sandberg, J. (2005). How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches? Organizational Research Methods 8(41), 41-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104272000
Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: The pedagogy of content/the content of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.006
Shalem, Y., & Slonimsky, L. (2014). Practical knowledge of teaching: What counts? In B. Barrett, & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum (pp. 198-212). Palgrave McMillan.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Smeby, J. C. (2008). Profesjon og utdanning. In A. Molander, & L.I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 87–102). Universitetsforlaget.
Southerland, S., Sinatra, G., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325-351.
Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2013). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x
Van Manen, M. (2015). Pedagogical Tact. Routledge.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE Publications.
Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2015). The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning: philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406
Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3-9.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Birgitte Lund Nielsen, Jens Hansen Lund
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.