Digitalization of teacher education
Are we prepared for epistemic change?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3751Keywords:
digitalization, epistemology, teacher education, transformation, agencyAbstract
This paper examines emerging epistemologies in the wake of increased digitalization and the extent to which student teachers are prepared for such epistemologies in their teacher education (TE) programs. Although there are a number of studies on digital epistemologies, few have examined the implications of digitally extended, embedded, and embodied cognition and the ensuing epistemic practices. This study’s analytic focus is partly on a number of project proposals that reflect some of these trends and partly on two surveys of (and some interviews with) student teachers at two universities who were engaged in developing their professional digital competence (PDC) as part of the TE programs. The surveys and interviews indicate that TE tends to focus on the use of digital technologies and less on addressing deeper, epistemological issues in efforts to foster student teachers’ PDC. These findings signify a gap between emerging epistemological trends and how student teachers are prepared for such trends. We conclude by suggesting a focus on digital, epistemic, and transformative agency for TE to cope with the increased digitalization of epistemic practices.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aagaard, T., & Lund, A. (2020). Digital agency in higher education: Transforming teaching and learning. Routledge Focus.
Aagaard, T., Lund, A., Lanestedt, J., Ramberg, K. R., & Swanberg, A.B. (2018a). Sammenhenger mel-lom digitalisering og utdanningskvalitet–innspill og utspill [Connections between digitaliza-tion and educational quality. Input and output]. Uniped, 41(3), 289–303.
Aagaard, T., Lund, A., Ramberg, K. R., Swanberg, A. B., Kofoed, T., & Lanestedt, J. (2018b). Digita-lisering for utdanningskvalitet og aktiv læring i høyere utdanning [Digitalization for educa-tional quality and active learing]. Tromsø, NO.
Arievitch, I. M. (2017). Beyond the brain: An agentive activity perspective on mind, development and learning. Sense Publishers.
Brevik, L. M. (2016). The gaming outliers: Does out-of-school gaming improve boys’ reading skills in English as a second language? In E. Elstad (Ed.), Educational technology and polycontex-tual bridging (pp. 39–62). Sense Publishers.
Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G., Lund, A., & Strømme, T. A. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Educa-tion, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005
Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2016). Exploring images of epistemic cognition across contexts and over time. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 197–214). Routledge.
Carter, J. A., & Kotzee, B. (forthcoming). Epistemology of education. https://philpapers.org/archive/CAREOE-4.pdf
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Oxford University Press.
Dørum, K., & Grepperud, G. (2015). På stedet hvil? Noen refleksjoner om implementering av IKT og læring i norsk høyere utdanning med utgangspunkt i Norgesuniversitetets arbeid [Standing at ease? Reflections on the implementation of ICT and learning in Norwegian higher education with the work of Norgesuniversitet as a point of departure]. Uniped, 38(3), 164–179.
Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures. Education, technology and social change. Routledge.
Fjørtoft, S. O., Thun, S., & Buvik, M. P. (2019). Monitor 2019. En deskriptiv kartlegging av digital tilstand i norske skoler og barnehager [A descriptive mapping of digitalization in Norwegian schools and kindergartens]. SINTEF.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Gudmundsdottir, G.B. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital com-petence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus. Vintage.
Heim, M. (1987). Electric language. A philosophical study of word processing (2nd ed.). Yale Uni-versity Press.
Huebner, B. (2013). Socially embedded cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 25–26, 13–18.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A.-T. (2017). Rammeverk for lærerens profesjonsfaglige digi-tale kompetanse [Framework for teachers' professional competence]. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education.
Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technologies in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 101–116.
Krumsvik, R. J. (Red.). (2016). Digital læring i skole og lærerutdanning [Digital learning in schools and teacher education]. Universitetsforlaget.
Lankshear, C. (2003). The challenge of digital epistemologies. Education, Communication & Infor-mation, 3(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303144
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1), 12–24.
Levy, D. (2007). Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper.
Lillejord, S., Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Rud, E. (2018). Learning and teaching with technology in high-er education – A systematic review. https://www.forskningsradet.no/om-forskningsradet/publikasjoner/2018/learning-and-teaching-with-technology-in-higher-education/
Ludwig, D. (2015). Extended cognition and the explosion of knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 28(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.867319
Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 281–299.
Lund, A., Furberg, A., & Gudmundsdottir, G. (2019). Expanding and embedding digital literacies: Transformative agency in education. Media & Communication, 7(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1880
Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for teaching and learning in technology rich learning envi-ronments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 258–271. http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2011/04/art04.
Lynch, M. P. (2014). Neuromedia, extended knowledge and understanding. Philosophical Issues, 24, 299–313. https://doi.org/10/1111/phis.12035
Magrini, J. (2009). How the conception of knowledge influences our educational practices: Toward a philosophical understanding of epistemology in education. College of DuPage. http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/13
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - A call to theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.
Pritchard, D. (2013). Epistemic virtue and the epistemology of education. Philosophical Issues, 24(1), 236–247.
Rozendaal, M. C., Boon, B., & Kaptelinin, V. (2019). Objects with intent: Designing everyday things as collaborative partners. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325277
Rückriem. (2009). Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 88–111). Cambridge University Press.
Sannino, A. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001
Serholt, S., Barendergt, W., Vasalou, A., Alves-Oliveira, P., Jones, A., Petisca, S., & Paiva, A. (2017). The case of classroom robots: Teachers’ deliberations on the ethical tensions. AI & Society, 32(4), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0667-2
Shapiro, L. (2007). The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 1–6. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
Stetsenko, A. (2017). The transformative mind. Expanding Vygotsky's approach to development and education. Cambridge University Press.
Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interac-tion (pp. 144–161). Routledge.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learn-ing, 26(1), 53–64.
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0. Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Penguin Random House UK.
Vaesen, K. (2014). Dewey on extended cognition and epistemology. Philosophical Issues, 24(1), 426–438.
Ward, D., & Stapleton, M. (2012). Es are good. Cognition as enacted, embodied, embedded, affec-tive and extended. In F. Pagliere (Ed.), Consciousness in interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Andreas Lund, Toril Aagaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
