Dimensions of teachers’ transdisciplinary competence based on a systematic review of three transdisciplinary areas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3757

Keywords:

teacher competence, transdisciplinarity, diversity competence, research competence, digital competence

Abstract

This study contributes to the conceptualisation of teachers’ competence through a systematic review (a concept synthesis) of three key transdisciplinary competencies—teachers’ diversity competence, teachers’ research and development competence, and teachers’ digital competence. Based on our analysis, we propose a set of dimensions to consider—within which there were important tensions in the research literature reviewed—when discussing teachers’ professional competence. These dimensions are: the 1) beneficiary, 2) teachers’ role, 3) attitudes, knowledge and skills, 4) sources of competence, 5) relationship to disciplinary content and 6) assessment. We discuss the three areas in light of these dimensions. We suggest that the complexity of being and becoming a teacher is a blind spot in research on teachers’ transdisciplinary competence and that many articles show deficit thinking about teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aflalo, E. (2014). The invisible barrier to integrating computer technology in education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n2p120

Akuma, F. V. & Callaghan, R. (2019). A systematic review characterizing and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry‐based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21516

Alvargonzález, D. (2011). Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2011.623366

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380

Biesta, G. (2014). How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? On judgement, wisdom, and virtuosity in teaching and teacher education. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on the future of teacher education (pp. 3–22). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118977859.ch1

Biesta, G. (2019). How general can Bildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal. In G. Biesta (Ed.), Obstinate Education (pp. 23–38). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401105_003

Bologna Process. (2018). Paris Communiqué (Vol. 25). http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2018_Paris/77/1/EHEAParis2018_Communique_final_952771.pdf

Bulterman-Bos, J. A. (2008). Will a clinical approach make education research more relevant for practice? Educational Researcher, 37(7), 412–420. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08325555

Getenet, S. T. (2017). Adapting technological pedagogical content knowledge framework to teach mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2629–2644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9566-x

Glaesser, J. (2019). Competence in educational theory and practice: a critical discussion. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1493987

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.

Hammerness, K. (2013). Examining features of teacher education in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656285

Hilton, J. T. (2016). A case study of the application of SAMR and TPACK for reflection on technology integration into two social studies classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2015.1124376

Hubbard, A. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge in computing education: A review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 28(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1509580

Krogh, L. B. & Kvols, A. M. (2016). Forskningsbaseret læreruddannelse: Hvad siger litteraturen? Via Undervisning og Læring.

Leutwyler, B. (2014). Between Myths and Facts: The Contribution of Exchange Experiences to The Professional Development of Teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n2p106

Lund, A., Jakhelln, R. E., & Rindal, U. E. (2015). Fremragende lærerutdanning - hva er det, og hvordan kan vi få det? In A. Lund, R. E. Jakhelln, & U. E. Rindal (Eds.), Veier til fremragende lærerutdanning (pp. 13–36). Universitetsforlaget.

Milne, A. A. (1926). Winnie-the-Pooh. Dell.

Ministry of Education and Research. (2016). Regulations relating to the Framework Plan for Primary and Lower Secondary Teacher Education for Years 5–10 [Forskrift]. Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c454dbe313c1438b9a965e84cec47364/forskrift-om-rammeplan-for-grunnskolelarerutdanning-for-trinn-5-10---engelsk-oversettelse.pdf

Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The, P. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mulholland, V. L. & Salm, T. (2017). “It doesn’t feel like a natural fit”: Co-operating teachers account for their evaluation and assessment of pre-service teachers’ efforts to fulfill social justice indicators. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 75–97.

OECD. (2005). Teachers matter. Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264018044-en

Oranje, J. & Smith, L. F. (2018). Language teacher cognitions and intercultural language teaching: The New Zealand perspective. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817691319

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu.

Robinson, D. B. & Young, D. (2019). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Inclusion-Related Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes and Student Outcomes: A Review of Recent Literature. Exceptionality Education International, 29(3).

Rosenberg, J. M. & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. http://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300302

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Sivertsen, G. (2013). Norskspråklige vitenskapelige tidsskrifter i humaniora og samfunnsvitenskap. Forfatterkrets, formål og mulighet for åpen tilgang. NIFU.

Staus, N., Gillow-Wiles, H., & Niess, M. (2014). TPACK development in a three-year online masters program: How do teacher perceptions align with classroom practice? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(3), 333–360.

Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 36(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276

Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Soobiah, C., Kastner, M., Cogo, E., MacDonald, H., D’Souza, J., Hui, W., & Straus, S. E. (2016). Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73(May), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.021

UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education: Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education; Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7–10 June 1994. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers: Competency standards modules. UNESCO.

van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenke, W. (2018). Barriers and conditions for teachers’ utilisation of academic knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.05.003

Westera, W. (2001). Competences in education: A confusion of tongues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270120625

Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-12-29

How to Cite

Smestad, B., & Gillespie, A. (2020). Dimensions of teachers’ transdisciplinary competence based on a systematic review of three transdisciplinary areas. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 4(3-4), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3757