VET and the “Competency-Tetris”

Inclusion of Whom, to What, and Where?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4835

Keywords:

vocational education and training (VET), competency-based training, human capital, managerialism, qualification

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to empirically analyse how the idea of inclusion is portrayed within the boundaries of the “Competency-Tetris”: a metaphor that should not be confused with the Tetris® game but used to theoretically capture individualised, competency-based, and managerially governed Vocational Education and Training (VET). We argue that the meaning of social inclusion within and through VET is unclear and vested by the human capital doctrines and the neoliberal assumptions from which it is derived. Whom does inclusion in VET involve, and to what and where does inclusion take place? Employing a design-based research approach, we used abductive applications to analyse data produced through participatory ethnographic observations (N=32) and interviews (N=12). The results identified four abstracted themes: (1) Fitting the workforce auction; (2) Multi-professional support trajectories; (3) Inclusion of qualification measures; and (4) Social and cultural learning communities. The first three abstracted themes suggest that the Competency-Tetris is a social divider of students based on a “go-forward” engine with social engineering at its fore. That is, the desired boundaries between VET and work are not strengthened, and the question of enabling equal learning for all students faces a U-turn. Thus, the economic value accumulated in competency-based qualification measures is accentuated. The latter abstracted theme identifies a different, albeit obscured, aspiration: human encounters requiring dignity, mutual respect, social generosity, and developmental sustainable ecology are increasingly approached as part of, within, and through VET.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Erika Löfström, University of Helsinki

Erika Löfström, PhD, is Professor of Education at the Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki where she leads the Swedish-language primary teacher education. Her research interests include teacher identity, ethics in supervision, and academic integrity.

References

Allais, S. (2014). Selling out education: National qualifications frameworks and the neglect of knowledge. Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-578-6

Allais, S. (2017). Labour market outcomes of national qualifications frameworks in six countries. Journal of Education and Work, 30(5), 457-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2016.1243232

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Asadullah, M. A., & Zafar Ullah, A. (2018). Social-economic contribution of vocational education and training: An evidence from OECD countries. Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(4), 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2017-0100

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and scientific realism. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 16-47). Routledge.

Billett, S. (2014). The standing of vocational education: Sources of its societal esteem and implications for its enactment. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 66(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.867525.

Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Cheung, S. (2020). The Death of human capital?: Its failed promise and how to renew it in an age of disruption. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190644307.001.0001

Brunila, K., Mertanen, K., & Mononen Batista-Costa, S. (2020). Economic worries - Therapeutic solutions? Entrepreneurial and therapeutic governing of transitions of young people. In K. Brunila & L. Lundahl (Eds.), Youth on the move: Tendencies and tensions in youth policies and practices (pp. 149-165). Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-3-8

Durkheim, E. (1984). Pragmatism and sociology (J. Alcock, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747

Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744

Han, S. (2008). Competence: Commodification of human ability. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(1), 31-39.

Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh019

Korpi, A., Hietala, R., Kiesi, J., & Räkköläinen, M. (2018). Competence-based, customer-oriented and efficient vocational education and training. Helsinki, Finland: Prime Minister's Office

Lauder, H., Young, M. M., Daniels, H., Balarin, M., & Lowe, J. (2012). Educating for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives. Routledge.

MINEDU (2017). VET will be reformed to meet the needs of students and working life. Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. Retrieved from https://minedu.fi/en/article/-/asset_publisher/ammatillisen-koulutuksen-reformi-uudistaa-koulutuksen-vastaamaan-opiskelijoiden-ja-tyoelaman-tarpeita

MINEDU. (2020). Funding based on outcomes, efficiency and effectiveness. Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. Retrieved from https://minedu.fi/en/administration-and-finance-vet

Niemi, A-M., & Jahnukainen, M. (2019). Educating self-governing learners and employees: Studying, learning and pedagogical practices in the context of vocational education and its reform. Journal of Youth Studies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1656329

Nilsson, A. (2010). Vocational education and training - An engine for economic growth and a vehicle for social inclusion? International Journal of Training and Development, 14(4), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00357.x

OECD. (2014). Skills beyond school: Synthesis report, OECD reviews of vocational education and training. Retrieved from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/skills-beyond-school_9789264214682-en#page76

Reay, D. (2012). What would a socially just education system look like? Saving the minnows from the pike. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.710015

Rosenblad, N., Schaffar, B., & Löfström, E. (2022). Immeasurability loss? An analysis of the impacts of accountability measures on counselling within VET. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 12(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.221221

Rosenblad, N., Schaffar, B., & Löfström, E. (under review). The grey zone between rationalised need and mediated motive: an activity theory analysis of student counselling within VET. Journal of Vocational Education and Training.

Schaffar, B. (2021). Competent uses of competence: On the difference between a value-judgment and empirical assessability. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 7(2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1958993

Simplican, S. C., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008

Studyinfo. (2022). Vocational education and training in Finland. Finnish National Agency for Education (EDUFI). Retrieved from https://studyinfo.fi/wp2/en/vocational-education-and-training/

TENK. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. Retrieved from https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

Toivanen, S., & Brunila, K. (2021). Emerging multi-professional assemblages of precision guidance producing the resilient and future-oriented citizen. Nordic Journal of Transitions, Careers and Guidance, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.16993/njtcg.28

Vehviläinen, S. (2014). Ohjaustyön opas: yhteistyössä kohti toimijuutta [A guide to counselling: In collaboration toward agency]. Gaudeamus.

Wheelahan, L. (2009). The problem with CBT (and why constructivism makes things worse). Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080902957913

Wheelahan, L. (2015). Not just skills: What a focus on knowledge means for vocational education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1089942

World Bank. (2013). World Development Report 2013: Jobs. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11843

Young, M. M. (2012). Education, knowledge and the 'voice' of knowledge. In H. Lauder, M. M. Young, H. Daniels, M. Balarin, & J. Lowe (Eds.), Educating for the knowledge economy? Critical perspectives (pp. 139-151). Routledge.

Several people interconnected through technology.  Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Downloads

Published

2022-09-19

How to Cite

Rosenblad, N., Schaffar, B., & Löfström, E. (2022). VET and the “Competency-Tetris”: Inclusion of Whom, to What, and Where?. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4835