Frameworking vocational teachers’ digital competences
An integrative literature review and synthesis
Keywords:Professional digital competence, Conceptual frameworks, Vocational teachers, Vocational education and training
Two decades of international research on digital competence of teachers have provided a number of frameworks for empirical studies and curriculum development. However, research publications addressing the needed digital competence of vocational (VET-) teachers are scarce. In this article we ask to what extent leading conceptual frameworks on digital competence are fruitful templates for studying such competences in the case of VET-teachers’ professional development, and what could be alternative conceptual models that fit this professional category. A synthesis is made of relevant literature based on a theoretical platform in vocational didactics and digitalization that highlights the diversity of international VET-systems and the connectivity between work and school. We adopt an integrative literature research approach that combines systematic procedures and supplementary searches in an iterative way.
Our descriptive analysis of the literature indicated that the international research on VET-teachers digital competence had in general a narrow focus on technical skills with a lack of perspective on key issues about their digital competences such as connectivity school / work, subject-specificity, and adaptive pedagogy. The articles tended to leave out contextual issues, for example the changing professional work of vocational teachers and background information about the national VET-systems. However, part of the literature pointed to the need for more “grounded” research starting from case-studies and qualitative data / mixed-methods research. Our synthesis of the literature in light of our theoretical framing identified four main topics for further research on VET-teachers’ digital competence that were incorporated in a working model or a “frameworking” that needs to be further developed in order to provide a rich and validated basis for constructing professional programs.
Aarkrog, V. (2021). Digitale læringsverktøjer i erhvervsuddannelserne. En videnskortlægning [Digital learning tools in VET, A literature review]. DPU, Aarhus Universitet. https://videnscenterportalen.dk/ciu/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2022/01/Videnskortlaegning-om-brug-af-AR-og-VR-i-hybrid-undervisning-22.12.21.pdf
Agrati, L. S. (2019). Digitizing disciplinary contents: A case study on sub-track competence. ACM International Conference Proceeding series, 633-641. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362934
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9073-6
Alhonkoski, M., Veermans, M., Artukka, K. & Salminen, L. (2022). The Perspectives of Healthcare Teachers on Their Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Three-Dim. Technology. Computer, Informatics, Nursing, 40(11), 743-753. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000876
Amenduni, F., Rauseo, M., Antonietti, C., & Cattaneo, A. (2022). Challenges and opportunities perceived by Swiss vocational education and training (VET) teachers during emergency. QWERTY, 17(2), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000057
Antera, S. (2021). Professional Competence of Vocational Teachers: a Conceptual Review. Vocations and Learning, 14, 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09271-7
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Backfisch, I., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Teachers’ technology use for teaching: Comparing two explanatory mechanisms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103390
Billett, S. (2020). Perspectives on Enhancing the Standing of Vocational Education and the Occupations It Serves. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1749483
Blikstad-Balas, M. (2014). Vague Concepts in the Educational Sciences: Implications for Researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 528-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.773558
Bouw, E., Zitterm I., & de Bruijn, E. (2019). Characteristics of learning environments at the boundary between school and work – A literature review, Educational Research Review, 26(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005
Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Lund, A., & Strømme Aanesland, T. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005
Broek, S. D., Pagliarello, M. C., de Vreede-Van Noort, R., & Vroonhof, P. (2017). Teachers and trainers in work-based learning/apprenticeships. Cedefop. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/34652
Bünning, F., Spöttl, G., & Stolte, H. (Eds.). (2022). Technical and Vocational Teacher Education and Training in International and Development Co-Operation: Models, Approaches and Trends. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6474-8
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Camilleri. P., Engen, B. K., Hatlevik, O. E., Rubio, C., & Gasso, H. H. (2021). Student teachers and their attitudes towards ICT: Lessons learned from three different countries. Nordic Journal of Comparative International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4207
Caruso, V., Cattaneo, A., & Gurtner, J.-L. (2016). Learning documentations in VET systems: An analysis of current Swiss practices. Vocations and Learning, 9(2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9149-4
Cattaneo, A., Felder, J., & Gurtner, J-L. (2021). Digital tools as boundary objects to support connectivity in dual vocational education. In E. Kyndt, S. Beausaert, & I. Zitter (Eds.), Developing connectivity between education and Work. Principles and Practices (pp. 137-157). Routledge.
Cattaneo, A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358
Cedefop (2020). Key competences in initial vocational education and training: digital, multilingual and literacy. Cedefop research paper; No 78. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/671030
Chakroun, B. (2019). National Qualifications Framework and TVET teacher competence frameworks: A neglected dimension of qualifications reforms? European Journal of Education, 54(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12359
Choy, S., Wärvik, G. B., & Lindberg, V. (Eds.). (2018). Integration of Vocational Education and Training Experiences Purposes, Practices and Principles. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5
Collier, D., & Gerring, J. (Eds.). (2008). Concepts and method in social science. The tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Routledge.
Dillenbourg, P., Cattaneo, A., Gurtner, J. L., & Davis, R. L. (2022). Educational Technologies for Vocational Training: Experiences as Digital Clay. SFUVET, EPFL, UNIFR. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7445778
Douse, M., & Uys, P. (2019). TVET teaching in the time of digitization. In McGrath, S., Mulder, M., Papier, P. & Stuart, R. (Eds.), Handbook of vocational education and training (p. 23–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3_75
Enochsson, A-B., Kilbrink, N., Andersén, A., & Ådefors, A. (2021). Obstacles to progress: Swedish vocational teachers using digital technology to connect school and workplaces, International Journal of Training Research, 20(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1979623
Erstad, O., Kjällander, S., & Järvelä, S. (2021). Facing the challenges of ‘digital competence’ a Nordic agenda for curriculum development for the 21st century. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 16(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2021-02-04
Evi-Colombo, A., Cattaneo, A., & Bétrancourt, M. (2020). Technical and pedagogical affordances of video annotation: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(3), 193-226. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/215718/
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) frame-work. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fischer, M. (2020). Beyond typologies: Alternative ways of comparing VET systems. In Pilz, M., & Li, J. (Eds.), Internationale Berufsbildungsforschung (p. 23-41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29924-8_2
Franco, A., Malhotra, M., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502-1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
Gessler, M., & Moreno Herrera, L. (2015). Vocational Didactics: Core Assumptions and Approaches from Denmark, Germany, Norway, Spain and Sweden. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(3), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.2.3.1
Godhe, A. L. (2019). Digital literacies or digital competence: Conceptualizations in Nordic curricula. Media and Communication, 7(2), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1888
Grollmann, P. (2018). The Quality of Vocational Teachers: teacher education, institutional roles and professional reality. In S. Choy, G. B. Wärvik, & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Integration of Vocational Education and Training Experiences Purposes, Practices and Principles (p. 63-82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5
Guetterman, T. C., Babchuk, W. A., Howell Smith, M. C., & Stevens, J. (2019). Contemporary Approaches to Mixed Methods–Grounded Theory Research: A Field-Based Analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817710877
Guile, D. (2019). The concept of “recontextualization”: implications for professional, vocational and workplace learning. Learning, culture and social interaction, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100343
Gustavsson, S., Dahlberg, G. M., & Berglund, I. (2020). Digitala körsimulatorer i yrkesutbildning: Utmaningar och möjligheter [Digital driving simulators in vocational education: Challenges and opportunities]. Nordic Journal of Vocational and Educational Training (NJVET), 10(1), 108–136. https://doi:10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.20101108
Hansen, J. J., & Karim, A. S. (2020). Alt drejer sig om it. Erhvervsskolelæreres tilgang til it [Everything is about ICT. VET-teachers access to ICT]. Syddansk Universitet.
Hämäläinen, R., & Cattaneo, R. (2015) New TEL environments for vocational education –teachers’ instructional perspective. Vocations and Learning, 8(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9128-1
Hatlevik, O. E., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Rohatgi, A. (2021). Digital Downsides in Teacher Education, Nordic Journal of Comparative International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4227
Havreberg, S. D., & Sylte, A. L. (2021). Velferdsteknologi i helse- og oppvekstyrker: Digitalt kompetansebehov i yrkesfaglig utdanning. [Welfare technology in health care vocations: Digital competence needs in vocational education]. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2111121
Hedström, P., & Udehn, L. (2009). Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle range. In P. Hedström, & P. Bearman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology (p. 25-47). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.2
Hesse, F., Wenger-Trayner, E., Pellegrino, J., Sharples, M., Hoppe, U., & Simons, P. R. (2022). The significance of Dual-T. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Cattaneo, J. L. Gurtner, & R. L. Davis (Eds.), Educational Technologies for Vocational Training Experiences as Digital Clay (p. 102-110). SFUVET, EPFL, UNIFR. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7445778
Hobley, J. (2021). Cultivating learners who ‘think like vocational professionals’: signature pedagogies, technology and vocational learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 26(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.1873407
Hobley, J. (2022). Will computers blow up the school: or is our digital wisdom evolving? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 27(1), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.2011515
Hoppe, M., & Kaiser, F. (2021). Comparing VET Teacher Education at University Level in Five European Countries. In C. Nägele, B. E. Stalder, & M. Weich (Eds.), Pathways in Vocational Education and Training and Lifelong Learning. Proceedings. of the 4th Crossing Boundaries Conference in VET (pp. 165–171). VETNET. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4636423
Kämäräinen, P., Gerrard, A., & Muller, W. (2019). Strategies and training models for promoting digital competences in the field of vocational education and training – Reflections on policies, conceptual frameworks and innovation projects. In B. E. Stalder, & C. Nagele (Eds.), Trends in vocational education and training research, Vol. II. (p. 179–197). VETNET / EERA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3371485
Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A-T. (2017). Professional Digital Competence Framework for Teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education.
Kilbrink, N., Enochsson, A-B., Andersén, A., & Ådefors, A. (2021). Teachers’ use of digital boundary objects to connect school and workplace-based learning in dual vocational education. In E. Kyndt, S. Beausaert, & I. Zitter (Eds.), Developing Connectivity between Education and Work (p. 119-135). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091219
Korhonen, A.-M., Ruhalahti, S., Lakkala, M., & Veermans, M. (2020). Vocational Student Teachers’ Self-Reported Experiences in Creating ePortfolios. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.3.2
Krötz, M., & Deutscher, V. (2022). Drop-out in dual VET: why we should consider the drop-out direction when analysing drop-out. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00127-x
Kyndt, E., Beausaert, S., & Zitter, I. (Eds.) (2021). Developing Connectivity between Education and Work. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091219
Lahn, L. C., & Nore, H. (2018). EPortfolios as Hybrid Learning Arenas in Vocational Education and Training. In S. Choy, G. B. Wärvik, & V. Lindberg, V. (Eds.), Integration of Vocational Education and Training Experiences (p. 207–226). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5_11
Lisborg, S., Daphne Händel, V., Schrøder, V., & Middelboe Rehder, M. (2021). Digital competences in Nordic teacher education: an expanding agenda. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4295
Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers & Education, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052
Lyckander, R. H. (2021). Exploring vocational teacher preparation in Norway: a study of dimensions and differences in vocational teacher learning, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.2007985
McDonagh, A., Camilleri, P., Engen, B. K., & McGarr, O. (2021). Introducing the PEAT model to frame professional digital competence in teacher education, Nordic Journal of Comparative International Education (NJCIE), 5(3), 5–17. http://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4226
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
National Council for Teacher Education (2018). Nasjonale retningslinjer for 3-årig yrkesfaglærerutdanning [National guidelines for 3-year vocational teacher education]. UHR-Lærerutdanning 14. juni 2018.
Niegemann, H. M. (2020). Introduction – A Look Back Ahead. In E. Wuttke, J. Seifried, & H. Niegemann (Eds.), Vocational Education and Training in the Age of Digitization: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 15-19). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18dvv1c.4
OECD (2021). Teachers and Leaders in Vocational Education and Training. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/59d4fbb1-en
Ottestad, G., Kelentric, M. & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2014). Professional Digital Competence in Teacher Education, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(2), 243–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-02
Pilz, M. (2016). Typologies in Comparative Vocational Education: Existing Models and a New Approach. Vocations and Learning, 9, 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9154-7
Rahmawati, A., Suryani, N., M., & Sukarmin, S. (2021). Vocational teachers’ perspective toward Technological Pedagogical Vocational Knowledge. Open Engineering,11, 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0040
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the EU. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Reich, A., Rooney, D., & Lizier, A. L. (2021). Using technology integration frameworks in vocational education and training, International Journal of Training Research, 19(2), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1864447
Roll, M. J. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Multidisciplinary digital competencies of pre-service vocational teachers. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00112-4
Sanchez-Prieto, J., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., Gómez-García, M., & Gómez-García, G. (2020). The generational digital gap within dual vocational education and training teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1557-1567. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1557
Saripudin, S., Budiyanto, I. B., Listiana, R., & Ana, A. (2021). Digital Literacy Skills of Vocational School Teachers. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(1), 666-680.
Schrauf, R. W. (2018). Mixed Methods Designs for Making Cross-Cultural Comparisons. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(4), 477-494. https://doi-org/10.1177/1558689817743109
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
Schwendimann, B. A, Cattaneo, A. A. P, Dehler Zufferey, J., Gurtner, J. L., Bétrancourt, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). The ‘Erfahrraum’: a pedagogical model for designing educational technologies in dual vocational systems, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 67(3), 367-396.. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2015.1061041
Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867
Tondeur, J., Howard, S. K., & Yang, J. (2021). One-size does not fit all: Towards an adaptive model to develop preservice teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106659
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future, Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
Tynjälä, P., Kyndt, E., Beausaert, S. & Zitter, I. (2022). Rethinking the connective typology of work experience: The challenge of learning through internship. In E. Kyndt, S. Beausaert, & I. Zitter (Eds), Developing connectivity between education and work (p. 3-14). Routledge.
UNESCO-UNEVOC (2022). Trends mapping study: Digital skills development in TVET teacher training. Unesco.
Villalba, M. T., Castilla, G., & Redondo-Duarte, S. (2018). Factors with influence on the adoption of the flipped classroom model in technical and vocational education. Journal of Information Technology Education-Research, 17, 441-469. https://doi.org/10.28945/4121
Vilppola, J., Lämsä, J., Vähäsantanen, K., & Hämäläinen, R. (2022). Teacher Trainees' Experiences of the Components of ICT Competencies and Key Factors in ICT Competence Development in Work-Based Vocational Teacher Training in Finland. International Journal of Research on Vocational Education and Training, 9(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.9.2.1
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of computer and education, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European J. of Information Systems, 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
Wuttke, E., Seifried, J., & Niegemann, H. (Eds.) (2020). Vocational Education and Training in the Age of Digitization: Challenges and Opportunities. Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18dvv1c
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Z., & Rauner, F. (2017). KOMET-Based Professional Competence Assessments for Vocational Education and Training (VET) Teachers in China. In M. Pilz (Ed.), Vocational Education and Training in Times of Economic Crisis Lessons from Around the World. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47856-2
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Leif Christian Lahn, Svanhild Kristine Berntsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.