Partnerskap på like premisser?
Styringsforventninger og institusjonelle praksiser sett fra lærerutdanningens perspektiv
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5586Keywords:
Partnerskap, lærerutdanning, styring, institusjonelle praksiserAbstract
‘Partnership’ is used as a collective term for cooperation on competence development between teacher education institutions and schools and is intended to lead to mutual learning. This article deals with experiences with partnerships from the teacher education`s point of view. The data material consists of interviews with teacher educators and leaders in teacher education institutions. The findings show that the staff members have many positive experiences, but they problematize certain organizational and steering challenges. They point out that it is demanding to share knowledge internally, and that research is somewhat connected to the work. They experience that the partnership primarily takes place on the school's premises, which may be related to the fact that steering expectations are directed at the teacher training programs and not at the schools. The study reveals differences in institutional practices, such as how the work is organized at a larger and a smaller teacher training institution, and whether the work is experienced as an individual or a collective project. The study shows that partnership is a complex phenomenon that shapes political and organizational conditions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Dahl, T., Askling, B., Heggen, K., Kulbrandstad, L. I., Lauvdal, T., Mausethagen, S., Qvortrup, L., Salvanes, K. G., Skagen, K., Skrøvset, S., & Thue, F. W. (2016). Om lærerrollen: Et kunnskapsgrunnlag. Fagbokforlaget.
Daza, V., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Lund, A. (2021). Partnerships as third spaces for professional practice in initial teacher education: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103338-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103338
Ellis, V., & McNicholl, J. (2015). Transforming Teacher Education: Reconfiguring the Academic Work. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219020
Elstad, E. (2020). Lærerutdanning i nordiske land. Universitetsforlaget.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., Anderson, E. R., Bohannon, A. X., Coburn, C. E., & Brown, S. L. (2022). Learning at the Boundaries of Research and Practice: A Framework for Understanding Research–Practice Partnerships. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211069073
Farrell, R. (2023). The School–University Nexus and Degrees of Partnership in Initial Teacher Education. Irish Educational Studies, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1899031
Finne, H., Mordal, S., & Stene, T. M. (2014). Oppfatninger av studiekvalitet i lærerutdanningene 2013. SINTEF.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (Sixth edition.). SAGE.
Forsström, S., & Munthe, E. (2023). What Characterizes Nordic Research on Initial Teacher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review. Nordic Studies in Education, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v43.5588
Fossestøl, K., Borg, E., Hermansen, H., Lyng, S. T., Mausethagen, S., & Myrvold, T. (2021). Lokal kompetanseutvikling—Evaluering av implementeringen av ny tilskuddsordning i grunnopplæringen (2021:6). Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet AFI.
Fossestøl, K., & Lyng, S. T. (2022, 18. mai). Ny infrastruktur for lokal kompetanseutvikling − tre viktige utfordringer. https://www.utdanningsnytt.no/bedre-skole-etterutdanning-fagartikkel/ny-infrastruktur-for-lokal-kompetanseutvikling-tre-viktige-utfordringer/317848
Frølich, N., Elken, M., & Eide, T. (2023). Mergers, distance, and leadership: Perceptions of different forms of distance to leadership in merger processes. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12477
Harford, J., & O’Doherty, T. (2016). The Discourse of Partnership and the Reality of Reform: Interrogating the Recent Reform Agenda at Initial Teacher Education and Induction Levels in Ireland. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.64
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2019). Profesjonalitet gjennom samarbeid: Når undervisning i samarbeid gir læring for alle. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Hedegaard, M. (2014). The Significance of Demands and Motives Across Practices in Children’s Learning and Development: An analysis of learning in home and school. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(3), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.008
Hermansen, H. (2020). In Pursuit of Coherence: Aligning Program Development in Teacher Education with Institutional Practices. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 936–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1639815
Hermansen, H., & Mausethagen, S. (2023). Konstruksjoner av «partnerskap» i universiteter og høgskolers samarbeid med skolesektoren. Uniped, 46(3), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.18261/uniped.46.3.5
Jakhelln, R. E., Lund, A., & Vestøl, J. M. (2017). Universitetsskoler som arena for nye partnerskap og profesjonskvalifisering. I: S. Mausethagen, & J.-C. Smeby (red.), Kvalifisering for profesjonell yrkesutøvelse (s. 70–82). Universitetsforlaget.
Jakhelln, R. E., & Postholm, M. B. (2022). University–school collaboration as an arena for community-building in teacher education. Educational Research, 64(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2071750
Klein, E. J., Taylor, M., Onore, C., Strom, K., & Abrams, L. (2013). Finding a third space in teacher education: Creating an urban teacher residency. Teaching Education, 24(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.711305
Kunnskapsdepartementet (2017a). Meld. St. 16 (2016–2017) [Stortingsmelding]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-16-20162017/id2536007/
Kunnskapsdepartementet (2017b). Lærerutdanning 2025. Nasjonal strategi for kvalitet og samarbeid i lærerutdanningene. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d0c1da83bce94e2da21d5f631bbae817/kd_nasjonal-strategi-for-larerutdanningene_nett.pdf
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju (3. utg.). Gyldendal akademisk.
Langley, A., Lindberg, K., Mørk, B. E., Nicolini, D., Raviola, E., & Walter, L. (2019). Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations: From Cartography to Process. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 704–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0089
Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education – a research mapping. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). The Only Generalization Is: There Is No Generalization. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Ed.), Caste Study Method: Key Issues, Key Text (pp. 27-45). Sage Publications.
Liu, S. (2015). Boundary Work and Exchange: The Formation of a Professional Service Market. Symbolic Interaction, 38(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.137
Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Learning Environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6(4), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-04-05
Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2010). Changing objects in knowledge-creation practices. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning Across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices (pp. 206–221). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847817
Meld. St. 21. (2016–2017). Lærelyst – tidlig innsats og kvalitet i skolen. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-21-20162017/id2544344/
NOKUT. (2006). Evaluering av allmennlærerutdanningen i Norge 2006. Del 1. https://kudos.dfo.no/dokument/evaluering-av-allmennlaererutdanningen-i-norge-2006.-del-1-hovedrapport?evalueringsportalen=1
NOKUT. (2010). Evaluering av førskolelærerutdaning i Norge 2010. Del 1. https://kudos.dfo.no/dokument/evaluering-av-forskolelaererutdaning-i-norge-2010.-del-1-hovedrapport?evalueringsportalen=1
Postholm, M. B., Normann, A., Dahl, T., Dehlin, E., Engvik, G., & Irgens, E. J. (Red.). (2018). Skole- og utdanningssektoren i utvikling. Fagbokforlaget.
Risan, M. (2023). Å «bygge bro» mellom skole og lærerutdanning: Det epistemiske grensearbeidet til lærere i kombinasjonsstillinger. Acta Didactica Norden, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.9644
Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., & Abrams, L. (2014). Tensions of Reimagining Our Roles as Teacher Educators in a Third Space: Revisiting a Co/autoethnography Through a Faculty Lens. Studying Teacher Education, 10(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2013.866549
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From Transfer to Boundary-crossing Between School and Work as a Tool for Developing Vocational Education: An Introduction. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between School and Work—New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-crossing (pp. 1–15). Emerald.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-Based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gaute Rydland Nilsen, Kristin Helstad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
