Opportunities and Dilemmas in Interactions between the Education Sector and Academia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5708Downloads
Metrics
References
Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing Neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638990
Bason, C. (2018). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society (2nd ed.). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447336259
Boyd, P., & Smith, C. (2016). The contemporary academic: orientation towards research work and researcher identity of higher education lecturers in the health professions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.943657
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., & Alsos, G. A. (2020). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12617
Czerniawski, G. (2023). Power, positionality and practitioner research: Schoolteachers’ experiences of professional doctorates in education. British Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1372–1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3902
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Henry Holt and Company, Inc.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1994). Truth and Method. Translated and revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Holley, K. (2015). Doctoral education and the development of an interdisciplinary identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847796
Jones, M. (2018). Contemporary trends in professional doctorates. Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 814–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438095
Lee, A., & Bongaardt, R. (2021). The future of doctoral research: Challenges and opportunities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003015383
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (Vol. III). University of Chicago Press.
Perry, J. A. (2012). To Ed.D. or not to Ed.D.? Phi Delta Kappan, 94(1), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400108
The Research Council of Norway. (2018). Evaluation of Norwegian education research. https://www.forskningsradet.no/siteassets/publikasjoner/1254033705916.pdf
Townsend, B. K. (2002). Rethinking the Ed.D., or What’s in a Name? Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (27th, Sacramento, CA, November 21-24, 2002).
Volpe, M. R., & Chandler, D. (1999). Reading Room Resolving Conflicts in Institutions of Higher Education: Challenges for Pracademics Resolving Conflicts in Institutions of Higher Education: Challenges for Pracademics. CNCR-Hewlett Foundation Seed Grant White Papers, 8. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/seedgrant
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mari-Ana Jones, Tessa Eriksen Grevle, Erlend Dehlin, Tony Burner, Sara Bubb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.