Opportunities and Dilemmas in Interactions between the Education Sector and Academia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5708

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing Neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638990

Bason, C. (2018). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society (2nd ed.). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447336259

Boyd, P., & Smith, C. (2016). The contemporary academic: orientation towards research work and researcher identity of higher education lecturers in the health professions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.943657

Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477

Clausen, T. H., Demircioglu, M. A., & Alsos, G. A. (2020). Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors. Public Administration, 98(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12617

Czerniawski, G. (2023). Power, positionality and practitioner research: Schoolteachers’ experiences of professional doctorates in education. British Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1372–1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3902

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Henry Holt and Company, Inc.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1994). Truth and Method. Translated and revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Holley, K. (2015). Doctoral education and the development of an interdisciplinary identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847796

Jones, M. (2018). Contemporary trends in professional doctorates. Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 814–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438095

Lee, A., & Bongaardt, R. (2021). The future of doctoral research: Challenges and opportunities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003015383

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (Vol. III). University of Chicago Press.

Perry, J. A. (2012). To Ed.D. or not to Ed.D.? Phi Delta Kappan, 94(1), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400108

The Research Council of Norway. (2018). Evaluation of Norwegian education research. https://www.forskningsradet.no/siteassets/publikasjoner/1254033705916.pdf

Townsend, B. K. (2002). Rethinking the Ed.D., or What’s in a Name? Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (27th, Sacramento, CA, November 21-24, 2002).

Volpe, M. R., & Chandler, D. (1999). Reading Room Resolving Conflicts in Institutions of Higher Education: Challenges for Pracademics Resolving Conflicts in Institutions of Higher Education: Challenges for Pracademics. CNCR-Hewlett Foundation Seed Grant White Papers, 8. https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/seedgrant

Machinery and people - illustrating interaction between the education sector and academia

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Jones, M.-A., Grevle, T. E., Dehlin, E., Burner, T., & Bubb, S. (2023). Opportunities and Dilemmas in Interactions between the Education Sector and Academia. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5708