Exploring the Potentials of Unplugged Activities
Developing Computational Thinking in Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5741Keywords:
Unplugged Activities, Computational Thinking, Teacher Education, Technology ComprehensionAbstract
This paper explores the use of unplugged activities as a pedagogical approach for teaching computational thinking (CT) to student teachers at a Danish university college in the subject technology comprehension. Through an analysis of three cases—a toothbrushing routine, a political profiling quiz, and an interactive story creation—the study examines students’ learning experiences and engagement with CT concepts and practices. The paper employs a methodological approach rooted in participatory observation and visual ethnography. Data collection includes video recordings, audio recordings, post-class interviews, and artefacts created by the students.
The analysis reveals possibilities as well as challenges experienced by students in their involvement in computational thinking activities, including algorithms, decomposition, and abstraction. These findings contest the oversimplified classification of activities as either 'plugged' or 'unplugged', suggesting that alternative factors hold more substantial importance. Subsequently, the paper explores the roles of self-efficacy and ‘be-greifbarkeit’ in students' learning processes, thereby elucidating how students' motivation and learning expectations, in conjunction with their tangible experiences and conceptual understandings, influence the development of their computational thinking competencies.
In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights for teacher educators, emphasising the need to consider the perceived complexity of the activity, including the students’ prerequisites for engaging with plugged and unplugged elements. It highlights the multifaceted nature of plugged and unplugged approaches, offering a nuanced perspective on their impact on students' learning experiences in the field of computational thinking.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Andersen, L. B., Tafdrup, O. A., Møller, T. E., Rehder, M. M., & Schrøder, V. (2023). The situated power of computational empowerment. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100576
Bell, T. C., Witten, I. H., & Fellows, M. (1998). Computer science unplugged: Off-line activities and games for all ages. https://classic.csunplugged.org/documents/books/english/unplugged-book-v1.pdf
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., & Earp, J. (2018). The Nordic approach to introducing computational thinking and programming in compulsory education. CNR Edizioni. https://doi.org/10.17471/54007
Brackmann, C. P., Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., Casali, A., Robles, G., & Barone, D. (2017). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. In Proceedings of the 12th workshop on primary and secondary computing education (pp. 65–72). https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada (Vol. 1, p. 25).
Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged Approaches to Computational Thinking: A Historical Perspective. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 64(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7
Città, G., Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Arrigo, M., Conti, D., Ottaviano, S., Reale, F., & Sciortino, M. (2019). The effects of mental rotation on computational thinking. Computers & Education, 141, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103613
Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J.M., (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Unpublished manuscript, referenced in http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
Curzon, P., McOwan, P. W., Plant, N., & Meagher, L. R. (2014). Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In Proceedings of the 9th workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 89-92). https://doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670767
Ezeamuzie, N. O., & Leung, J. S. C. (2021). Computational Thinking Through an Empirical Lens: A Systematic Review of Literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211033158
Ford, V., Siraj, A., Haynes, A., & Brown, E. (2017). Capture the flag unplugged: an offline cyber competition. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 225-230). https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017783
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Huang, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2021). A Critical Review of Literature on ‘Unplugged’ Pedagogies in K-12 Computer Science and Computational Thinking Education. Computer Science Education, 31(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411
Katterfeldt, E.-S., Dittert, N., & Schelhowe, H. (2015). Designing digital fabrication learning environments for Bildung: Implications from ten years of physical computing workshops. Digital Fabrication in Education, 5, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.001
Lisborg, S., Händel, V. D., Schrøder, V., & Rehder, M. M. (2021). Digital competences in Nordic teacher education: an expanding agenda. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4295
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ministry of Children and Education (2023). Forsøg med teknologiforståelse i folkeskolens obligatoriskeundervisning slutevaluering [Experiments with technology comprehension in the primary school's compulsory education final evaluation]. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/aktuelt/pdf21/okt/211004-slutevaluering-teknologoforstaaelse.pdf
Pajchel, K., Mifsud, L., Frågåt, T., Rehder, M. M., Juuti, K., Bogar, Y., Lavonen, J., Schrøder, V., Aalbergsjø, S. G., & Rognes, A. (2024). Sign of the Times: An Analysis of Computational Thinking in Norwegian, Finnish and Danish Curricula. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 8(4). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5744
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1988). A critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In B. Sendov & I. Stanchev (Eds.), Children in the information age (pp. 3–18). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-036464-3.50006-5
Pink, S. (2007). Doing Visual Ethnography. SAGE Publications.
Rehder, M. M., & Møller, T. E. (2021). Visuelle etnografiske analysemetoder: fra filmoptagelser til skrevne analyser. I: H. Møller, M. E. Jensen, V. Schrøder, & A. S. Gregersen (red.), Kvalitative undersøgelser i læreruddannelsens BA-projekt: inspiration fra praksisnær skoleforskning (pp. 131–143). Samfundslitteratur.
Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. MIT Press.
Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and Strategies from a Teacher’s Perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9482-0
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Threekunprapa, A., & Yasri, P. (2020). Unplugged Coding Using Flowblocks for Promoting Computational Thinking and Programming among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13314a
Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Pinkwart, N., Butz, M., Trautwein, U., & Ninaus, M. (2017). Training computational thinking: Game-based unplugged and plugged-in activities in primary school. 687–695. In European conference on games based learning (pp. 687-695). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Tømte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Kårstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK framework goes online. Computers & Education, 84, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why?. Unpublished manuscript Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mads Middelboe Rehder , Jesper Juellund Jensen, Thilde Emilie Møller, Vibeke Schrøder
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
