Assessing Computational Literacy in First Language (L1) Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5743Keywords:
Computational Literacy, Assessment, K9, Language Arts, TeachingAbstract
This article addresses the multifaceted challenges of assessing computational literacy (CL) within the context of first language (L1) teaching. The article commences by examining the theoretical foundations and the need for an expanded understanding of CL, moving beyond the popular notion of computational thinking (CT). We then present an example from a 5th-grade classroom in a Danish middle school to illustrate how pupils integrate computational skills into their writing practices through a design-based intervention. Subsequent to this example, we propose a cross-disciplinary framework designed to assess CL in L1 settings, focusing on four principles that bridge traditional language arts with computational approaches. Finally, we reflect on how the application of these principles can help formulate new learning goals that better align with the emerging demands of 21st-century education. Throughout the article, we argue that a CL approach provides a more socially rooted and context-sensitive method for integrating computational methods into non-computer science subjects, offering theoretical clarity and practical benefits for both educators and researchers alike. The article commences with a discussion of the CL approach related to assessment.
Downloads
Metrics
References
American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
Biggs, J. B. & Tang, C. S. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Bers, M. U. (2021). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. Routledge.
Berthelsen, U. D. (2023). Digital humaniora og teknologiforståelse [Digital humanities and computational empowerment]. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 16(28). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v16i28.136744
Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Receiving the gift of teaching: from ‘learning from’ to ‘being taught by’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(5), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9312-9
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., & Earp, J. (2018). The Nordic approach to introducing Computational Thinking and programming in compulsory education. Report prepared for the Nordic@BETT2018 Steering Group. https://doi.org/10.17471/54007
Brennan, K. (2015). Objects To Think With. Constructivist Foundations, 10(3), 313–314.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. 1, pp. 1–25).
Buus, L., Georgsen, M., & Lindenskov Tamborg, A. (2023). Teknologiforståelser i uddannelsessystemet: Editorial [Technology Comprehension in the Educational System: Editorial]. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 16(28). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v16i28.142410
Caeli, E. N., & Bundsgaard, J. (2019). Computational thinking in compulsory education: A survey study on initiatives and conceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09694-z
Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2019). Unplugged Approaches to Computational Thinking: A Historical Perspective. TechTrends (2020) 64, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
Christensen, O., & Tufte B. (2010). Media Education: Between Theory and Practice. In S. Kotilainen, & S.-B. Arnolds-Granlund (Eds.), Media Literacy Education: Nordic Perspectives (pp. 109-120). Nordicom.
Cizek, G. J., Andrade, H. L., & Bennett, R. E. (2019). Formative Assessment: History, Definition, and Progress. In H. L. Andrade, R. E. Bennett, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines (pp. 3–19). Routledge.
Cutumisu, M., Adams, C., & Lu, C. (2019). A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Recent Computational Thinking Assessments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09799-3
Delcker, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Computational Thinking as an Interdisciplinary Approach to Computer Science School Curricula: A German Perspective. In P. Rich, & C. Hodges (Eds.), Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations (pp. 49-62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_4
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational thinking. The MIT Press.
Dindler, C., Iversen, O. S., Caspersen, M. E., & Smith, R. C. (2022). COMPUTATIONAL EMPOWERMENT. In H. Abelson, & S.-C. Kong (Eds.), Computational Thinking Education in K–12: Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Physical Computing (pp. 121–139). MIT Press.
Dindler, C., Smith, R., & Iversen, O. S. (2020). Computational empowerment: Participatory design in education. CoDesign International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 16(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722173
diSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. The MIT Press.
diSessa, A. A. (2018). Computational literacy and “the big picture” concerning computers in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403544
Dolin, J., & Qvortrup, L. (2013). Fagdidaktik – viden og undervisning. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4
Edwards-Groves, C. (2012). Interactive Creative Technologies: Changing learning practices and pedagogies in the writing classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651876
Graf, S. T. (2017). Dannende undervisning - en begrebsafklaring. Studier i læreruddannelse og profession, 2(1), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.7146/lup.v2i1.27706
Grover, S. (2022). Computational Thinking Today. In A. Yadav, & U. D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Computational Thinking in Education—A Pedagogical Perspective (pp. 18–40). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102991-2
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Hachmann, R. (2022). Cybervåbnet: Computationel praksis i 8. Klasse. I: S. S. Fougt, J. Bundsgaard, T. Hanghøj, & M. Misfelt (Red.), Håndbog i scenariedidaktik (pp. 489–501). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Hachmann, R. (2024a). Designing for Computational Literacy in Non-Computer Science Subjects. In Creating Design Knowledge in Educational Innovation (pp. 232–245). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003391432-25
Hachmann, R. (2024b). Computationel Literacy in Schools: Cognitive, social and material aspects. Learning Tech, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v8i13.149529
Hansen, S. B., Hachmann, R., & Dohn, N. B. (2023). Computational thinking beyond computer science. In S. H. Klausen, & N. Mård (Eds.), Developing a Didactic Framework Across and Beyond School Subjects (pp. 232–242). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367260-21
Heintz, F., Mannila, L., Nordén, L.-Å., Parnes, P., & Regnell, B. (2017). Introducing Programming and Digital Competence in Swedish K-9 Education. In V. Dagienė & A. Hellas (Eds.), Informatics in Schools: Focus on Learning Programming (Vol. 10696, pp. 117–128). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71483-7_10
Jølle, L., & B. Skar, G. (2021). 13. En modell for planlegging, gjennomføring og evaluering av morsmålsfaglige læringsprosesser. I: L. Jølle, A. S. Larsen, H. Otnes, & L. I. Aa (Red.), Morsmålsfaget som fag og forskningsfelt i Norden (pp. 291–309). Universitetsforlaget. https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215050997-2021-15
Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2021). A Revaluation of Computational Thinking in K–12 Education: Moving Toward Computational Literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211057904
Kafai, Y., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2020). From theory bias to theory dialogue: Embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381887
Kress, G., & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003
Krogh, E., & Piekut, A. (2015). Voice and narrative in L1 Writing. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 15, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2015.15.01.10
Mills, K. A. (2015). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, Material and Sensory Lenses. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783094639
Ministry of Children and Education (2019). Dansk Fælles Mål [Common Goals for Danish]. Retrieved May 10th, 2024.https://emu.dk/sites/default/files/2020-09/GSK_F%C3%A6llesM%C3%A5l_Dansk.pdf
Mifsud, L., Andersen, R., Frågåt, T., Boğar, Y., & Jensen, J. J. (2023). Representations of computational thinking in policy documents in an educational context: The cases of Denmark, Finland, and Norway. In P. Blikstein, J. Van Aalst, R. Kizito, & K. Brennan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 35-42). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2023.719530
Niemelä, P., Pears, A., Dagienė, V., & Laanpere, M. (2022). Computational Thinking – Forces Shaping Curriculum and Policy in Finland, Sweden and the Baltic Countries. In D. Passey, D. Leahy, L. Williams, J. Holvikivi, & M. Ruohonen (Eds.), Digital Transformation of Education and Learning—Past, Present and Future (pp. 131–143). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97986-7_11
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2020). Norwegian Curriculum for primary, lower secondary and upper secondary - Kunnskapsløftet 2020. https://www.udir.no/in-english/curricula-in-english/
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
Rajapakse-Mohottige, N. U. S., Andersen, R., & Bjerke, A. H. (2024). Computational thinking in Norwegian teacher education: An analysis of mathematics and science course descriptions. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 19(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.19.1.3
Riis, M., Andersen, B. L., Dybdal, M., Jørnø, R. L., Slot, M. F., & Hjort, M. (2021). Teknologiforståelsens fagdidaktik. Learning Tech, (10). https://tidsskrift.dk/learningtech/issue/view/9409/1585
Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01580516
Snow, E., Tate, C., Rutstein, D., & Bienkowski, M. (2017). Assessment Design Patterns for Computational Thinking Practices in Exploring Computer Science. SRI International.
Slot, M. F., Gissel, S. T., & Hjorth, M. (2021). Teknologiforståelse i fag. Learning Tech, 6(10), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v6i10.125676
Slot, M. F., Rasmussen, H. F., & Kjærgaard, T. (2023). Teknologiforstyrrelser i læreruddannelsens danskfag: på vej med danskfaglige teknologiforståelser i læreruddannelse . Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 16(28). https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v16i28.136093
Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
UNESCO. (2023). What you need to know about literacy. https://www.unesco.org/en/literacy
U.S. Government. (2023). Building Computational Literacy Through Stem Education: A Guide For Federal Agencies And Stakeholders. A Report by the Computational Literacy Interagency Working Group, Federal Coordination in STEM Education Subcommittee, Committee on STEM Education of the National Science and Technology Council.
Valente, A., & Marchetti, E. (2020). Playful Learning and Shared Computational Thinking: the PaCoMa case study. In H-J. So, M. M. Rodrigo, J. Mason, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2020 (Vol. II, pp. 180-189). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Vee, A. (2017). Coding Literacy: How Computer Programming Is Changing Writing. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10655.001.0001
Weintrop, D., Rutstein, D., Bienkowski, M., & McGee, S. (2021). Assessment of Computational Thinking. In A. Yadav & U. D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Computational thinking in compulsory education: A pedagogical perspective (pp. 90–111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102991-6
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational Thinking: What and Why? Unpublished manuscript Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Roland Hachmann, Marie Falkesgaard Slot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
