Job demands and resources of information and technology use among teachers in Germany

A group concept mapping study

Forfattere

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5718

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Information and communication technology (ICT), technostress, digitalization, school, teacher health, well-being

Sammendrag

Some teachers associate Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use with additional stress, referred to as technostress, while others seem to be able to utilize the advantages and potentials of ICT. There is a lack of research on how ICT experience is perceived as a threat or a positive challenge to well-being and how ICT specifically impacts the well-being of teachers in a positive way. Thus, the study aims to compile influencing factors of ICT use on teachers’ well-being and to gain knowledge on the role of the benefits of ICT. Furthermore, information about the interplay of factors is to be obtained. The group concept mapping (GCM) method was used with 14 in-service German teachers from different school types. They compiled, sorted and rated factors related to teachers’ well-being in the context of ICT use. The sorted factors were structured using non-metric multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Seventy-eight unique factors were generated and divided into 9 clusters. The resulting concept map (CM) provides an overview of the various factors and gives information about their interplay. In addition, the teachers rated clusters related to the positive effects on teachers’ well-being as more important than those related to negative effects. The results suggest that future studies should consider the positive effects of ICT on teachers’ well-being more extensively. Furthermore, the structure of the CM and the individual factors are linked to previous research. Limitations concerning the chosen method and sampling are discussed.

Forfatterbiografi

Ingmar Hosenfeld, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau

Center for Educational Research, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Referanser

Al-Fudail, M. (2008). An exploration of teacher stress when using ICT in technology-rich classrooms [Dissertation]. University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10019300/

Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3363315

Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bar, H., & Mentch, L. (2017). R-CMap – an open-source software for concept mapping. Evaluation and Program Planning, 60, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.018

Baumeister, V. M., Kuen, L. P., Bruckes, M., & Schewe, G. (2021). The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis. SAGE Open, 11(4), 215824402110615. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061560

Bećirović, S. (2023). Digital Pedagogy: The Use of Digital Technologies in Contemporary Education (1st ed. 2023). SpringerBriefs in Open and Distance Education. Springer Nature Singapore; Imprint Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0

Bordi, L., & Nuutinen, S. (2023). Experiences of technostressors during the Covid-19 pandemic among Finnish comprehensive school teachers. Seminar.Net, 19(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5257

Bordi, L., Okkonen, J., Mäkiniemi, J.‑P., & Heikkilä-Tammi, K. (2018). Communication in the Digital Work Environment: Implications for Wellbeing at Work. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 8(53). https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v8iS3.105275

Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications (2. ed.). Springer series in statistics. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2711-1

Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Addison-Wesley.

Califf, C. B., & Brooks, S. (2020). An empirical study of techno-stressors, literacy facilitation, burnout, and turnover intention as experienced by K-12 teachers. Computers & Education, 157, 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103971

Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352

Chou, H.‑L., & Chou, C. (2021). A multigroup analysis of factors underlying teachers' technostress and their continuance intention toward online teaching. Computers & Education, 175, Article 104335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104335

Çoklar, A. N., Efilti, E., Sahin, Y. L., & Akçay, A. (2016). Investigation of techno-stress levels of teachers who were included in technology integration processes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 1331-1339.

Day, A., Barber, L. K., & Tonet, J. (2019). Information Communication Technology and Employee Well-Being. In R. N. Landers (Ed.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior (pp. 580–607). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649636.022

Del Rey-Merchán, M. C., & López-Arquillos, A. (2022). Occupational Risk of Technostress Related to the Use of ICT among Teachers in Spain. Sustainability, 14(14), 8746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148746

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5

Donnelly, J. P. (2017). A systematic review of concept mapping dissertations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 60, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.010

Effiyanti, T., & Sagala, G. H. (2018). Technostress among teachers: a confirmation of its stressors and antecedent. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(2), Article 92197, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2018.092197

Efilti, E., & Naci Çoklar, A. (2019). Teachers' technostress levels as an indicator of their psychological capital levels. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070214

Fernández-Batanero, J.‑M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M.‑M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of Educational Technology on Teacher Stress and Anxiety: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for Life in a Digital World: Iea International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 International Report (1st ed. 2020). Springer eBook Collection. Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5

Hassan, N., Yaakob, S. A., Halif, M. M., Aziz, R. A., Majid, A. A., & Sumardi, N. A. (2019). The effects of technostress creators and organizational commitment among school teachers. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.7563

Hill, N. S., Axtell, C., Raghuram, S., & Nurmi, N. (2024). Unpacking Virtual Work's Dual Effects on Employee Well-Being: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 50(2), 752–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221131535

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004

Kane, M. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. SAGE Publications Inc.

Kultusministerkonferenz. (2016). Bildung in der digitalen Welt: Strategie der Kultusministerkonferenz. Kultusministerkonferenz. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/PresseUndAktuelles/2017/Strategie_neu_2017_datum_1.pdf

Kuusimäki, A.‑M., Uusitalo-Malmivaara, L., & Tirri, K. (2019). The role of digital school-home communication in teacher well-being. Front. Psychol., 10, Article 2257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02257

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10265641

Mäkiniemi, J.‑P. (2022). Digitalisation and work well-being: a qualitative study of techno-work engagement experiences related to the use of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0276

Mäkiniemi, J.‑P., Ahola, S., & Joensuu, J. (2020). A Novel Construct To Measure Employees’ Technology-Related Experiences of Well-Being: Empirical Validation of the Techno-Work Engagement Scale (TechnoWES). Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.79

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.91.7990

Moreira-Fontán, E., García-Señorán, M., Conde-Rodríguez, Á., & González, A. (2019). Teachers' ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement. Computers & Education, 134, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007

Mußmann, F., Hardwig, T., Riethmüller, M., & Klötzer, S. (2021). Digitalisierung im Schulsystem 2021: Arbeitszeit, Arbeitsbedingungen, Rahmenbedingungen und Perspektiven von Lehrkräften in Deutschland. Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. https://www.gew.de/fileadmin/media/sonstige_downloads/hv/Service/Presse/2021/2021-09-29-STUDIE-Digitalisierung-im-Schulsystem-2021-Gesamtbericht-web.pdf https://doi.org/10.3249/ugoe-publ-10

Nimrod, G. (2018). Technostress: Measuring a new threat to well-being in later life. Aging & Mental Health, 22(8), 1080–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037

Özgür, H. (2020). Relationships between teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), school support and demographic variables: a structural equation modeling. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, Article 106468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106468

Pablos-Pons, J. de, Colás-Bravo, P., González-Ramírez, T., & Del Camacho Martínez-Vara Rey, C. (2013). Teacher well-being and innovation with information and communication technologies; proposal for a structural model. Quality & Quantity, 47(5), 2755–2767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9686-3

Park, J.‑C., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2020). Effect of work-related smartphone use after work on job burnout: moderating effect of social support and organizational politics. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106194

Passey, D. (2021). Digital technologies – and teacher wellbeing? Educ. Sci., 11, 11030117. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030117

R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org

Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fcc33b68-d581-11e7-a5b9-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2012). Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003

Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the Job Demands-Resources model. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008

Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching Excellence through Professional Learning and Policy Reform. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252059-en

Stan, R. (2022). Personality traits, technology-related teaching skills, and coping mechanisms as antecedents of teachers' job-related affective well-being and burnout in compulsory and higher education online teaching settings. Front. Psychol., 13, Article 792642. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792642

Syvänen, A., Mäkiniemi, J.‑P., Syrjä, S., Heikkilä-Tammi, K., & Viteli, J. (2016). When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar.Net, 12, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2281

Tarafdar, M., Gupta, A., & Turel, O. (2013). The dark side of information technology use. Information Systems Journal, 23(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12015

Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109

ter Hoeven, C. L., & van Zoonen, W. (2015). Flexible work designs and employee well-being: examining the effects of resources and demands. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12052

Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5

Trochim, W. M. K. (1993). The Reliability of Concept Mapping: Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, Texas, November 6, 1993 [Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, Texas, November 6, 1993]. http://www.billtrochim.net/research/Reliable/reliable.htm

Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (2018). Rethinking Learning in a Digital Age: Outcomes from EDUsummIT 2017. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9383-y

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003

Nedlastinger

Ytterligere filer

Publisert

2024-10-02

Hvordan referere

Cramer, M., & Hosenfeld, I. (2024). Job demands and resources of information and technology use among teachers in Germany: A group concept mapping study. Seminar.net, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5718

Utgave

Seksjon

Articles