Tverrfaglige møteplasser og utvikling av transformative fagfellesskap for bærekraftsundervisning i lærerutdanningen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6614Keywords:
Education for sustainable development, interdisciplinary collaboration, transformative development, teacher education, dialogic practicesAbstract
This study investigates how organised interdisciplinary arenas in teacher education can serve as an initial step toward developing transformative professional communities for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). It addresses the persistent gap between the demand for interdisciplinary competencies among future teachers, who are expected to teach cross‑curricular themes, and the well‑documented challenges of fostering interdisciplinarity within teacher education itself. Theoretically, the article draws on conceptualisations of sustainable development as an overarching, interdisciplinary perspective embedded in transformative learning processes. Central to this understanding are critical reflection, dialogue, experience, and context, with dialogue highlighted as a conversational practice that can foster diverse meanings and mutual recognition. Methodologically, the study employs an exploratory, qualitative, participatory design. Collective qualitative analysis was conducted using audio recordings from interdisciplinary workshops involving teacher educators. The researchers also participated in the workshops, offering an insider perspective and providing insight into interactional processes shaping interdisciplinary approaches to ESD. The analysis demonstrates that teacher educators use these arenas to jointly explore key sustainability concepts, such as action competence, systems thinking, critical thinking, and perspective‑taking. Transformative elements of the dialogues are characterised by both recognition and resistance, generating productive diversity of meaning. Dialogic patterns are discussed in relation to transformative processes in which critical reflection, shared experiences, and emotional engagement challenge and expand existing frames of reference. The study concludes that organised interdisciplinary arenas hold substantial potential for cultivating interdisciplinary ESD as part of intentional efforts to develop transformative dialogue within professional communities. By examining local practices in Norwegian teacher education, the article illuminates international challenges of implementing ESD and highlights how institutional, national, and global discourses intersect in teacher educators’ dialogues. The participatory and exploratory design contributes to comparative education by offering insight into how transformative learning communities can emerge at the interface between local experience and global sustainability perspectives.
Downloads
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. University of Texas Press.
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera, G. M. (2022, January 13). GreenComp The European sustainability competence framework. JRC Publications Repository. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286
Boylorn, R. M., & King, N. (2008). Participants as Co-Researchers. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buseth, J. T., Didham, R., Høvik, K. Ø., Martinsen, M., & Øyehaug, A. B. (2025). Exploring teacher educators’ views on interdisciplinary teaching: a cross-disciplinary study of interdisciplinarity for sustainability education. Acta Didactica Norden, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.11405
Didham, R. J., Fujii, H., & Torkar, G. (2024). Exploring Interdisciplinary Approaches to Education for Sustainable Development. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5877
Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2020). 21st Century Competencies in Light of the History of Integrated Curriculum. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00122
Eggebø, H. (2020). Kollektiv kvalitativ analyse. Norsk Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 4(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2020-02-03
Eikeland, O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian phrónêsis, Aristotelian philosophy of dialogue, and action research. Peter Lang.
Gabrielsen, A., Kjæret, A., & Loftsgarden, M. (2025). Bærekraftig utvikling som tverrfaglig tema: Hva mener lærerutdannere bør vektlegges i grunnskolelærerutdanningen? Acta Didactica Norden, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.11418
Gericke, N., Hudson, B., Olin-Scheller, C., & Stolare, M. (2018). Powerful knowledge, transformations and the need for empirical studies across school subjects. London Review of Education, 16(3), 428-. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.06
Given, L. M. (2008). Participants as Co-Researchers. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (Vol. 2, pp. 599–601). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n310
Grobler, S., & Dittrich, A.-K. (2024). Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: Perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 26(3), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-06-2023-0048
Grund, J., Singer-Brodowski, M., & Büssing, A. G. (2024). Emotions and transformative learning for sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability Science, 19(1), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01439-5
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume 1 (Vol. 1). Polity Press.
Haye, A., & González, R. (2021). Dialogic borders: Interculturality from Vološinov and Bakhtin. Theory & Psychology, 31(5), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320968635
Helldén, G. (2013). Elevers kunskapsutveckling och förståelse av ekologiska processer. Liber.
ICFE. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. International Commission on the Futures of Education. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722
Kucukaydin, I., & Cranton, P. (2013). Critically Questioning the Discourse of Transformative Learning Theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713612439090
Laros, A., Fuhr, T., & Taylor, E. W. (2017). Transformative Learning Meets Bildung: An International Exchange. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-797-9
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Information Age Pub.
Mälkki, K., & Green, L. (2014). Navigational Aids: The Phenomenology of Transformative Learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614541171
Meld. St. 16 (2016-2017). Kultur for kvalitet i høyere utdanning. Kunnskapsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-16-20162017/id2536007/
Mellingen, Ø. K. K., & Tollefsen, I. (2023). Bærekraftig utvikling i norsk skoleforskning. En litteraturgjennomgang. In T. S. Bredal-Tomren (Ed.), Utdanning for bærekraft. Erfaring og forskning fra barnehage og skole. Cappelen Damm Forskning. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.193
Mezirow, J. (2009). Transformative Learning Theory. In E. W. Taylor & J. Mezirow (Eds.), Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education (pp. 18–32). John Wiley & Sons.
Mezirow, J., & Taylor, E. W. (2011). Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education. John Wiley & Sons.
MIRO. (2026). AI-arbeidsområde for innovasjon | Miro. https://miro.com/nb/
Olin, A., Almqvist, J., & Hamza, K. (2021). To recognize oneself and others in teacher-researcher collaboration. Educational Action Research, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1897949
Pope, E. M. (2020). From Participants to Co-Researchers: Methodological Alterations to a Qualitative Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 25(10), 3749–3761. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4394
Ricoeur, P. (2005). The course of recognition. Harvard University Press.
Schibbye, A.-L. L. (1996). Anerkjennelse: En terapeutisk intervensjon? Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening (trykt utg.).
Schnepfleitner, F. M., & Ferreira, M. P. (2021). Transformative Learning Theory – Is It Tıme to Add A Fourth Core Element? Journal of Educational Studies and Multidisciplinary Approaches, 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2021.9
Sinnes, A. T. (2021). Utdanning for bærekraftig utvikling: Hva, hvorfor og hvordan? (2. utgave). Universitetsforlaget.
Taylor, E. W. (2011). Fostering transformative learning. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education. John Wiley & Sons.
Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020). Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13244
Woiwode, C., Schäpke, N., Bina, O., Veciana, S., Kunze, I., Parodi, O., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: Fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00882-y
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013), On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3017
Yosief, A., Sulieman, M.-S., & Biede, T. (2024). Improving the practices of teacher educators through collaborative action research: Challenges and hopes. Educational Action Research, 32(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2022.2066147
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pauline Book, Jill Tove Buseth, Eli Flatekval, Eldrid Tonette Rusdal Haugen, Ingeborg Knævelsrud, Ann-Therese Dalbakk Nomerstad, Inger-Kristin Larsen Vie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.