Evidence under fire
What studies of gamification in Ukrainian higher education can and cannot show — a systematic review (2015–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6788Nøgleord:
meta-research, Ukraine, war, reporting quality, publication bias, academic achievementResumé
This systematic review examines what research on gamification in Ukrainian higher education shows about students' academic achievement, and what its designs and reporting allow a reader to conclude. Following PRISMA 2020, eight databases were searched for studies published in English or Ukrainian in 2015–2025; after peer review, excluded records were re-screened and citation searching was added. Effects were synthesised by vote counting of effect directions, and risk of bias was appraised with an adapted Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Forty-eight studies met the criteria; although the search covered 2015–2025, the earliest was published in 2017, and 42 appeared from 2020 onward, during the COVID-19 pandemic and the full-scale war. None was randomised and none was at low risk of bias. Of 30 studies measuring achievement, 29 reported a positive direction of effect and one a mixed result. Only 12 reported a significance test, and a standardised between-group effect could be computed for five; the four unconfounded estimates ranged from g = 0.50 to 0.77. Eleven of the 12 tests were significant, against about seven expected at the effect size reported by international meta-analyses, and the one non-significant result was reported alongside a conclusion that the intervention worked. Sensitivity analyses showed that the scarcity of null results was not produced by the review's selection rules. The direction of the evidence is favourable; its certainty is very low. Three descriptive measures — the share of studies from which an effect can be computed, the strongest design present and the share of null results — summarise what the corpus can support; their values were similar before and after February 2022. For comparative and international education, the review shows how such measures can inform decisions to draw on evidence from partner systems or to build research capacity with them.
Downloads
Referencer
References marked with an asterisk (*) are the 49 reports of the 48 included studies.
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
*Bakhmat, N., & Chaikovska, O. (2021). Web-based professional vocabulary learning with the high school students. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021) (pp. 318–324). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210320.054
*Balcı, M. A., Akgüller, Ö., Kaya, E., Rzhevska, N., Dobroskok, I., Basiuk, L., & Kosa, T. (2020). Potential of game «PLANT TISSUE CULTURE» in bioengineering education as distance laboratory classes. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22311
Burde, D., Kapit, A., Wahl, R. L., Guven, O., & Skarpeteig, M. I. (2017). Education in emergencies: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 619–658. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316671594
Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
*Chaikovska, O., & Zbaravska, L. (2020). The efficiency of Quizlet-based EFL vocabulary learning in preparing undergraduates for state English exam. Advanced Education, 7(14), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.197808
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615
Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19(22), 3127–3131. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<3127::AID-SIM784>3.0.CO;2-M
Collyer, F. M. (2018). Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South. Current Sociology, 66(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020
Crossley, M., & Watson, K. (2003). Comparative and international research in education: Globalisation, context and difference. RoutledgeFalmer.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
*Diahyleva, O., Yurzhenko, A., & Kononova, O. (2024). Gamification techniques in Maritime English online courses: Motivating learners in virtual environments. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 965–972. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.008
*Dmitrenko, N., Stakhova, I., & Franchuk, N. (2025). Heimifikatsiia yak zasib rozvytku vmin hovorinnia maibutnikh uchyteliv anhliiskoi movy u pochatkovii shkoli [Gamification as a means of developing the speaking skills of prospective English teachers in primary school]. Innovations in Preschool and Primary Education, (4), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-2439-2025-4-9
Fanelli, D. (2010). "Positive" results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068
Fanelli, D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90(3), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
*Fedorova, Y., Bondarenko, T., Mikuš, J., Korniush, H., & Nesterenko, R. (2024). Shaping emotional intelligence with gamification techniques. In Towards a hybrid, flexible and socially engaged higher education (pp. 455–463). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53022-7_45
*Folomieieva, N., Pelekh, V., Haidamashko, I., Sivak, N., & Koriakin, O. (2024). Gamification in the educational process of higher education institutions. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 13(73), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.73.01.28
*Fursenko, T., Bystrova, B., & Druz, Y. (2021). Integrating Quizlet into aviation English course. Advanced Education, 8(17), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.217990
Ganguli, I., & Waldinger, F. (2023). War and science in Ukraine (NBER Working Paper No. 31449). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31449
*Głowacki, J., Kriukova, Y., & Avshenyuk, N. (2018). Gamification in higher education: Experience of Poland and Ukraine. Advanced Education, 5(10), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.151143
*Goncharuk-Khomyn, M., Bilyschuk, M., Pishkovtsi, A.-M., Lokota, I., Ivaskevych, V., Marian-Yovbak, V., & Bilei, A. (2025). Usage of virtual reality and gamification to enhance pre-clinical endodontic teaching process: First experience among Ukrainian dental students. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, 18(1), 166–174.
*Gorban, Y., & Skachenko, O. (2020). Experience of use of Kahoot! digital tool in the university library activities. Ukrainian Journal on Library and Information Science, (5), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.5.2020.205730
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
*Hannichenko, T., & Zhebko, O. (2025). Gamification as an innovative approach to teaching English to master's students in management. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Pedagogical Sciences, (3(122)), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.3(122).2025.22
Hladchenko, M. (2022). Implications of publication requirements for the research output of Ukrainian academics in Scopus in 1999–2019. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(3), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2022-0016
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
*Holubnycha, L., Kostikova, I., Kravchenko, H., Simonok, V., & Serheieva, H. (2019). Cloud computing for university students' language learning. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/157
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
*Iaremenko, N. V. (2017). Enhancing English language learners' motivation through online games. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 59(3), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1606
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials, 4(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774507079441
*Kobernyk, O. M., & Kalashnik, N. V. (2019). Developing students' skills into pedagogical improvisation using didactic games. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Pedagogical Sciences, (2(97)), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.2(97).2019.51-60
*Konstantynova, T., Dundiuk, V., Hurievska, O., Zhulkanych, B., & Shevchuk, O. (2024). Gamification of the educational process in distance education. Eduweb, 18(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.02.12
*Kostikova, I., Holubnycha, L., Girich, Z., & Movmyga, N. (2021). Soft skills development with university students at English lessons. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1/378
Kurapov, A., Pavlenko, V., Drozdov, A., Bezliudna, V., Reznik, A., & Isralowitz, R. (2023). Toward an understanding of the Russian-Ukrainian war impact on university students and personnel. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 28(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2022.2084838
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Lukianenko, V., & Golub, T. (2025). Teaching during the wartime: Experience from Ukraine. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 57(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2098714
*Lebedeva, I., Norik, L., & Lebedev, S. (2022). Development of human potential: Design thinking as a way of improving professional competencies of economists. Economics of Development, 20(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.57111/devt.20(1).2022.43-52
*Lopatynska, I., Bratanych, O., Biletska, I., Cherednychenko, V., & Pustovoichenko, D. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of Kahoot as a computer-assisted language learning tool in higher education. Eduweb, 18(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.01.11
*Malaniuk, N., Hubarieva, D., Sviatenko, T., Gogunskaya, I., & Parfanovich, I. (2023). Means of gamification of learning during martial law. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 12(61), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.61.01.24
*Matviienko, O. V., Kuzmina, S., & Yanishevska, Z. (2023). Gamified English language learning in Ukraine: Critical divide between tradition and innovation. Arab World English Journal, (9), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.11
*Nalyvaiko, O., Zhukova, O., Ivanenko, L., Shvedova, Y., & Nekrashevych, T. (2021). Gamification as a new format of projects method in blended learning conditions studying disciplines of the pedagogical cycle. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.4/468
Nazarovets, S. (2022). Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus-delisted titles. Learned Publishing, 35(4), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1464
*Nikolaeva, S., Chernysh, V., Boiko, H., & Galynska, O. (2023). Business simulation games in developing pre-service restaurant managers' speech interaction competence using GPTChat. Advanced Education, 10(22), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.276166
*Nozhovnik, O., Harbuza, T., Teslenko, N., Okhrimenko, O., Zalizniuk, V., & Durdas, A. (2023). Chatbot gamified and automated management of L2 learning process using Smart Sender platform. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(3), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.3.603
*Opryshko, T., & Nazarovets, S. (2021). Case study: Citizen science in digital humanities context. In Digital Humanities Workshop (DHW 2021) (pp. 198–203). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526242.3526246
*Ovsiienko, L., Kulyk, O., Kardash, L., Makarchuk, O., & Boyko, S. (2025). Language shifts in the digital age: The transformation of lexical and grammatical structures under the influence of social networks. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr2025180
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
*Pavlova, N., Shrol, T., & Poliukhovych, N. (2024). Gamification as a educational technology for professional training. Interdisciplinary Studies of Complex Systems, (24), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.31392/iscs.2024.24.146
*Petrovych, O., Zavalniuk, I., Bohatko, V., Poliarush, N., & Petrovych, S. (2023). Motivational readiness of future teachers-philologists to use the gamification with elements of augmented reality in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(3), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i03.36017
*Pishchanska, V., Altukhova, A., Prusak, Y., Kovmir, N., & Honcharov, A. (2022). Gamification of education: Innovative forms of teaching and education in culture and art. Eduweb, 16(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2022.16.02.8
Rui, P., & Wei, W. (2025). Gamification and neurogaming to improve motor coordination and cognitive abilities in musicians and athletes. Acta Psychologica, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105857
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
*Savitska, V., Gomotiuk, O., Stefanyshyn, O., Rashid, M. A., Lengyelfalusy, T., & Šurín, S. (2025). Educational possibilities of gamification in the formation of soft & hard skills among students of socionomic professions. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 16(2), 819–839. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.819.839
*Shkola, I., Dmitrenko, N., Kondratieva, O., Shymanovych, I., & Moroz, A. (2025). Gamification methods for developing lexical competence of engineering students. Environment. Technology. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 3, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol3.8543
*Shlenova, M. (2021). Gamification as a tool for increasing the learning efficiency of future librarians. Visnyk of Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, (59), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5333.059.05
*Stakhova, I., Kushnir, A., Franchuk, N., Kolesnik, K., Lyubchak, L., & Vatso, M. (2024). Enhancing the digital competence of prospective primary school teachers through utilizing Kahoot! International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2024.346
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). Globalization in education: Real or imagined? In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 1–11). Teachers College Press.
*Stupak, O. (2020). Educational technologies in training future managers. Advanced Education, 7(15), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.200229
Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Lopatina, H., Shevchenko, L., & Popov, A. I. (2023). Science in times of crisis: How does the war affect the efficiency of Ukrainian scientists? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(1).2023.35
*Synekop, O., Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Chuhai, O., & Lukianenko, V. (2023). Use of games in ESP classes: Perceptions from students and teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(16), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i16.41275
*Titova, L., & Kryvoruchko, I. (2024). Cloud services as a means of gamification in the training of future teachers. Information Technologies in Education, (2(56)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000783
*Todorova, N. (2023). Effect of Quizlet use on Ukrainian service members' English vocabulary acquisition. Advanced Education, 11(23), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.281048
Tsybuliak, N., Suchikova, Y., Gurenko, O., Lopatina, H., Kovachov, S., & Bohdanov, I. (2023). Ukrainian universities at the time of war: From occupation to temporary relocation. Torture Journal, 33(3), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v33i3.136256
*Tsymbal, S. (2018). Gamified training sessions as means of enhancing students' motivation in learning English. Psychological Journal, 7(17), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2018.7.17.10
*Tsymbal, S. V. (2019). Enhancing students' confidence and motivation in learning English with the use of online game training sessions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 71(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v71i3.2460
*Vakaliuk, T. A., Osova, O. O., Chernysh, O. A., & Bashkir, O. I. (2022). Checking digital competence formation of foreign language future teachers using game simulators. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 90(4), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v90i4.4816
*Verbovetskyi, D. V., & Oleksiuk, V. P. (2025). Methodology of training future computer science teachers to implement game-based learning: A case study. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 4060, 232–249. https://doi.org/10.55056/ceur-ws.org/vol-4060/paper03.pdf
*Volkotrubova, A., Tymoshchuk, O., Struk, O., Shevchenko, V., & Boiaryshcheva, T. (2023). Learning gamification tools for the development of students' cognitive independence. Revista EDaPECI, 23(2), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.29276/redapeci.2023.23.218686.48-60
*Voloshynov, S. A., Popova, H. V., Yurzhenko, A. Y., & Shmeltser, E. O. (2020). The use of digital escape room in educational electronic environment of maritime higher education institutions. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 7, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.55056/cte.364
*Yechkalo, Y. V., Tkachuk, V. V., Shurupova, K. A., Zinchenko, V. M., & Puhach, A. V. (2024). Gamification in higher education: Methodology. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3844, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.55056/ceur-ws.org/vol-3844/paper13.pdf
*Zhernovnykova, O. A., Peretiaha, L. Ye., Kovtun, A., Korduban, M. V., Nalyvaiko, O., & Nalyvaiko, N. A. (2020). Tekhnolohiia formuvannia tsyfrovoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv zasobamy heimifikatsii [The technology of forming digital competence of future teachers by means of gamification]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 75(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v75i1.3036
*Zhumbei, M., Apelt, H., Savchuk, N., Akimov, O., & Tsymbal, I. (2025). Leveraging gamification to sustain student motivation and emotional resilience in higher education during wartime: Case studies from Ukraine. LatIA, 3. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025345
*Zhyhadlo, O. (2022). Application of digital game-based tools for formative assessment at foreign language lessons. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 87(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v87i1.4703
*Zinovieva, T., & Kolot, S. (2023). Enhancing students' emotional intelligence with game-based learning as an ICT tool. Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, (15), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2023.154
*Zvarych, I., Kalaur, S., Prymachenko, N. M., Romashchenko, I. V., & Romanyshyna, O. (2019). Gamification as a tool for stimulating the educational activity of students of higher educational institutions of Ukraine and the United States. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.875
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 Oleksii Dotsenko
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
