Sparse and Selective
Digital Responsibility Practices in Lower Secondary English Classrooms in Norway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6274Keywords:
Digital responsibility, Digital competence, English language teaching, Lower secondary school, Mixed methodsAbstract
Despite broad agreement that schools should support students in becoming digitally responsible citizens, research suggests that this dimension of students’ digital competence remains underdeveloped, even in highly digitalised educational settings. Addressing this issue, the present study explored the prevalence and characteristics of digital responsibility practices in Norwegian lower secondary schools’ English classrooms. Utilising a tracing comparative logic, it examined classroom practices over time, following the same student cohorts across Grades 8 and 10 (ages 13–15). Video recordings from 63 naturally occurring English lessons and 9 teacher interviews were quantitatively and qualitatively analysed. The findings indicate that digital responsibility was the least prevalent dimension of digital competence across both grades, with teachers rarely seizing opportunities for students to gain insight into – or to reflect on – digital responsibility and seemingly de-prioritising progression across grades. Instead, digital responsibility instruction primarily occurred in response to student queries and was often overshadowed by the teaching of functional digital skills. The findings suggest the need to support English teachers in better integrating digital responsibility into classroom practices.
Downloads
References
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929
Blikstad-Balas, M., & Klette, K. (2020). Still a long way to go. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-05
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Doetjes, G., & Barreng, R. L. S. (2023). Å observere fagfornyelsen i klasserommet. Observasjonsprotokoller for livsmestring, utforsking og digital kompetanse [Observing the Subject Renewal in the Classroom. Observation Protocols for Life Skills, Inquiry and Digital Competence]. Rapport 1 fra forsknings-og evalueringsprosjektet EDUCATE ved Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
Burns, T., & Gottschalk, F. (2019). Educating 21st century children: Emotional well-being in the digital age. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/b7f33425-en
Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Cohen, J. (2018). Practices that cross disciplines? Revisiting explicit instruction in elementary mathematics and English language arts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.021
Drisko, J., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
Egeberg, G., Hultin, H., & Berge, O. (2016). Monitor 2016. Skolens digitale tilstand [Monitor 2016. Schools’ digital state]. Senter for IKT i utdanningen.
Eickelmann, B., Barbovschi, M., Holmarsdottir, H., Parsanoglou, D., Sisask, M., & Labusch, A. (2024). Perspectives of children and young people on their education as preparation for their future in the digital age: In-depth qualitative study in five European countries. In H. Holmarsdottir, I. Seland, C. Hyggen, & M. Roth (Eds.), Understanding the everyday digital lives of children and young people (pp. 321–350). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46929-9_11
Elstad, E., & Eriksen, H. (2024). High school teachers’ adoption of generative AI: Antecedents of instructional AI utility in the early stages of school-specific chatbot implementation. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5736
Engen, B. (2020). Innledning: Om forholdet mellom utdanning, digitalisering og sosial forandring [Introduction: On the relationship between education, digitalization, and social change]. In B. Engen (Ed.), Digitalisering, kompetanse og læring (pp. 11-26). Gyldendal.
Engen, B., Giæver, T., & Mifsud, L. (2021). Om å utøve digital dømmekraft [On exercising digital responsibility]. In B. Engen, T. Giæver, & L. Mifsud (Eds.), Digital dømmekraft (pp.17-29). Gyldendal.
Fraillon, J. (Ed.). (2024). An international perspective on digital literacy. Results from ICILS 2023. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Furberg, A., Silseth, K., Rødnes, K., Arnseth, H., Kvamme, O., Rasmussen, I., Sæther, E., Vasbø, K., Pettersen, K., Øistad, J., & Lund, A. (2021). Fagfornyelsen i møte med klasseromspraksiser: Elevers læring i møte med de tverrfaglige temaene [The curriculum renewal facing classroom practices: Students encounter the cross-curricular topics]. Rapport 7 fra prosjektet EVA2020 ved Utdanningsvitenskapelig fakultet. Universitetet i Oslo.
Giæver, T., Mifsud, L., & Gjølstad, E. (2021). Digital dømmekraft i skolen: Lærerens tilnærming [Digital responsibility in schools: The teacher’s approach]. In B. K. Engen, T. Giæver, & L. Mifsud (Eds.), Digital dømmekraft (pp. 105-122). Gyldendal.
Gudmundsdottir, G., Gassó, H., Rubio, J., & Hatlevik, O. (2020). Student teachers’ responsible use of ICT: Examining two samples in Spain and Norway. Computers & Education, 152, Article 103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103877
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Brevik, L. M., Aashamar, P. N., Barreng, R. L. S., Dodou, K., Doetjes, G., Hartvigsen, K. M., Hatlevik, O. E., Isaksen, A. R., Magnusson, C. G., Mathé, N. E. H., Roe, A., Skarpaas, K. G., Stovner, R. B., & Suhr, M. L. (2024). Variasjon og valgfrihet, mens vi venter på digital dømmekraft. Digital kompetanse i fagene i det heldigitale klasserommet på 10. trinn og vg3 [Variation and freedom of choice, while we are waiting for digital responsibility. Digital competence in the subjects in the digital classroom in grade 10 and 13]. Rapport 4 fra forsknings-og evalueringsprosjektet EDUCATE ved Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.
Gudmundsdottir, G., Holmarsdottir, H., Mifsud, L., Teidla-Kunitsõn, G., Barbovschi, M., & Sisask, M. (2024). Talking about digital responsibility: Children’s and young people’s voices. In H. Holmarsdottir, I. Seland, C. Hyggen, & M. Roth (Eds.), Understanding the everyday digital lives of children and young people (pp. 379–431). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46929-9_13
Hatlevik, O., & Christophersen, K. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015
Kure, A., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Brevik, L. M. (2025). Digital ambitions vs. classroom reality in Norwegian lower secondary schools: What digital competencies are students developing over time? Teaching and Teacher Education, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104843
Kure, A., Brevik, L. M., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2023). Digital skills critical for education: Video analysis of students’ technology use in Norwegian secondary English classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12745
Lee, W., & Chan, A. (2008). Computer ethics: An argument for rethinking business ethics. 2nd World Business Ethics Forum, Hong Kong.
Marshall, S. J. (2018). Technology and modern students—The digital natives fallacy. In S. J. Marshall (Ed.), Shaping the university of the future: Using technology to catalyse change in university learning and teaching (pp. 197–211). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7620-6_10
Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P., & Lavranos, C. (2020). A study of higher education students’ self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1413–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041
Mason, L., Junyent, A., & Tornatora, M. (2014). Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional intervention. Computers & Education, 76, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.016
Mertens, D. (2023). Mixed methods research. Research methods. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ministry of Education and Research. (2019a). Læreplan i samfunnsfag (SAF01-04) [Curriculum for Social Studies]. Established as regulations. The National curriculum for the Knowledge Promotion 2020. https://www.udir.no/lk20/saf01-04
Ministry of Education and Research. (2019b). Læreplan i engelsk (ENG01-05) [Curriculum for English. Established as regulations. The National curriculum for the Knowledge Promotion 2020. https://www.udir.no/lk20/eng01-05
National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. (2024). Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (NDET). (2017a). Core curriculum–Values and principles for primary and secondary education. Laid down by Royal decree. The National curriculum for the Knowledge Promotion 2020. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/53d21ea2bc3a4202b86b83cfe82da93e/core-curriculum.pdf
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (NDET). (2017b). Rammeverk for grunnleggende ferdigheter [Framework for basic skills]. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/rammeverk/rammeverk-for-grunnleggende-ferdigheter/2.1-digitale-ferdigheter/
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (NDET). (2022). Utdanningsspeilet 2022 [The Norwegian education mirror 2022]. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/publikasjoner/utdanningsspeilet/utdanningsspeilet-2022/
Ottestad, G., Throndsen, I., Hatlevik, O., & Rohatgi, A. (2014). Digitale ferdigheter for alle? Norske resultater fra ICILS 2013 [Digital skills for all? Norwegian results from ICILS 2013]. Senter for IKT i utdanningen, Universitetet i Oslo.
Poth, C. N. (2018). Innovation in mixed methods research: A practical guide to integrative thinking with complexity. Sage Publications.
Rohatgi, A., Hatlevik, O., Gudmundsdottir, G., Erstad, O., & Björnsson, J. (2024). ICILS 2023: Digital kompetanse og algoritmisk tenkning hos norske niendeklassinger [ICILS 2023: ICILS 2023: Digital competence and algorithmic thinking among Norwegian ninth graders]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.219
UNESCO. (2017). Working group on education: Digital skills for life and work. UNESCO Digital Library
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens – With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/115376
Aasen, P., Møller, J., Rye, E., Ottesen, E., Prøitz, T., & Hertzberg, F. (2012). Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform - et løft eller et løfte? Forvaltningsnivåenes og institusjonenes rolle i implementeringen av reformen [The Knowledge Promotion Reform as a Governance Reform. The Role of Administrative Levels and Institutions in the Implementation of the Reform]. NIFU.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kaja Granum Skarpaas, Katherina Dodou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
