Craft as More-Than-Human Practice-led research in a posthumanist perspective

Forfattere

  • Ragnar Vennatrø NTNU University Museum
  • Harald Bentz Høgseth Norwegian University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4205

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Practice-led research, craft research, post humanism, post-anthropocentric, multiple ontologies

Sammendrag

This article considers craft science and practice-led research in light of more-than-human approaches to practice under the heading posthumanism, as found within humanities and social sciences in recent years. Practice-led research within craft science, represents a vital and ground-breaking field of inquiry, as an embodied subjective field of examination with an impressive ability to gain deep knowledge of various forms of skilled and/or natural practices. One aspect of practice that this research seems less able to grasp, is a broader practical connection between multiple ontologies of human and non-human practice. Going beyond a purely human phenomenology of craft, this article seeks a more symmetrical and post-anthropocentric approach to knowledge and materiality, as practice in multiple ontologies. This would mean a shift in how craft science view practice, from being a strictly operational aspect adhering to human practitioners, to practice as an ongoing more-than-human process by which phenomena (and practitioners) are brought into being and are maintained.

Forfatterbiografier

Ragnar Vennatrø , NTNU University Museum

Archaeologist (Cand.philol)

Harald Bentz Høgseth , Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Professor (Dr.art)

Referanser

Andersson, D. T. (2001). Tingenes taushet, tingenes tale. Solum Forlag.

Bjerck, H. B. (2019). What could the ‘sea ice machine’ do to its people? On the lateglacial Doggerland, marine foraging, and the colonisation of Scandinavian seascapes. Environmental Archaeology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2019.1642673

Bogost, I. (2012). Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001

Brattli, T. & Steffensen, M. (2014). Expertise and the formation of university museum collections. Journal of Nordic Museology, (1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.5617/nm.3034

Brattli, T. & Brendalsmo, J. (2016). Democracy and cultural heritage as dense discourse: An issue of multiplicity, complexity and unpredictability. In Guttormsen, T. S. & Swensen, G. (eds.), Heritage, Democracy and the Public: Nordic Approaches, 59-69. Routledge.

Bryant, L. (2011). The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities. https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.9750134.0001.001

Bryant, L. (2014). Onto-Cartography. An ontology of machines and media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Damsholt, T., Sørensen, D. G. (2009). Materialiseringer: Processer, relationer og performativitet. In Damsholt, T., Sørensen, D. G. & Mordhorst, C. (eds.). Materialiseringer: Nye perspektiver på materialitet og kulturanalyse, 9-38. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Candy, L. (2006). Practice-based research: A guide, Creativity & Cognition Studios. University of Technology, Sydney.

Fredengren, C. (2015). Nature:Culture:Heritage: Sustainability and Feminist Posthumanism. Current Swedish Archaeology, (23), 109-130.

Gibson, J. J. (2014/1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press Classic Editions. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218

González-Ruibal, A. (2008). Time to Destroy, Current Anthropology 49(2), 247-279. https://doi.org/10.1086/526099

Groth, C. (2017). Making Sense Through Hands. Design and Craft Practice Analysed as Embodied Cognition. [Aalto university publication series Doctoral Dissertations 1/2017]. Aalto ARTS Books.

Grusin, R. (2015). (ed.) The Nonhuman Turn. University of Minneapolis Press.

Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court.

Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Open Court.

Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and Time. (Macquarrie & Robinson, trans.). Blackwell.

Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought, (Hofstadter, A., trans.). Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (1982). Basic problems of phenomenology. Winter semester 1919/1920. (Hofstadtler, A., trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Høgseth, B. H. (2007). Håndverkerens redskapskasse: en undersøkelse av kunnskapsutøvelse i lys av arkeologisk bygningstømmer fra 1000-tallet. [Doctoral Diss. Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet]. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/242854

Ingold, T. (2000). The temporality of the landscape. In: The Perception of the Environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill, 189-208. Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2018). Five questions of skill. Cultural geographies 25(1), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017702514

Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material agency towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8

Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5(4), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. The MIT Press.

Malm, A. (2018). The Progress of This Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. Verso.

Marchand, T. H. J. (2010). Making knowledge explorations of the indissoluble relation between mind, body and environment. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01607.x

Marchand, T. H. J. (2012). Knowledge in hand: explorations of brain, hand and tool. In Fardon, R., et al. (eds.). Handbook of Social Anthropology. 260-269. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201077.n54

Mäkelä, M. (2007). Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20(3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9028-2

Mäkelä, M, Nimkulrat, N., Dash, D. P., Nsenga, F.-X. (2011). On reflecting and making in artistic research, Journal of Research Practice, 7(1), Article E1. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/download/280/241?inline=1

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003/1945). Phenomenology of Perception. (Smith, C., trans.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610

Mol, A. (1999). Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions. The Sociological Review, 47(May), 47-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x

Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151

Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review. 83(4), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914

Niedderer, K. (2013). Explorative materiality and knowledge: The role of creative exploration and artefacts in design research. FormAkademisk, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.651

Olsen, B. (2003). Material Culture after Text: Re-Membering Things. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36(2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650

Olsen, B. (2006). Ting-mennesker-samfunn: Introduksjon til en symmetrisk arkeologi. Arkeæologisk Forum, (14), 13-18. http://www.archaeology.dk/upl/12963/AF144.BjrnarOlsen.pdf

Olsen, B (2010). In Defence of Things. Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Altamira Press.

Olsen, B. & Witmore, L. (2015). Archaeology, symmetry, and the ontology of things: A response to critics. Archaeological Dialouges, 22(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203815000240

Pink, S. (2010) The future of sensory anthropology/the anthropology of the senses. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 18(3), 331-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2010.00119_1.x

Rust, C., Mottram, J. & Elshaw, M. (2007). Practice-led research in Art, Design and Architecture. Arts and Humanities Research Council.

Skar, Ø. (2016). Oversettelse av Martin Heidegger: Tingen. Filosofisk Supplement, (3), 54-64.

Sterling, C. (2020). Critical Heritage and the posthumanities: problems and prospects. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13527258.2020.1715464.

Smith, P. H., Meyers, A. R. W. & Cook, H. J. (2014). (eds.) Ways of making and knowing: the material culture of empirical knowledge. The University of Michigan Press.

Vennatrø R. (2005). Numedals Reffne – En sprekk i virkeligheten. Oppdagelsen av skjelettfunnet i Bølehula på fylkesgrensa mellom Sør- og Nord-Trøndelag. [Cand.philol thesis, Institutt for arkeologi og religionsvitenskap og Vitenskapsmuseet, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskaplige universitet, Trondheim].

Vennatrø, R. (2012). Arkeologi mellom oppdagelse og glemsel: Forståelsen av et funn i en sprekk i virkeligheten. Primitive Tider, (14), 121-133.

Webmoore, T. & Witmore, C. L. (2008). Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human: Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650701698423

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2021-05-10

Hvordan referere

Vennatrø , R., & Høgseth , H. B. . . (2021). Craft as More-Than-Human: Practice-led research in a posthumanist perspective. FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4205