Craft as More-Than-Human
Practice-led research in a posthumanist perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4205Keywords:
Practice-led research, craft research, post humanism, post-anthropocentric, multiple ontologiesAbstract
This article considers craft science and practice-led research in light of more-than-human approaches to practice under the heading posthumanism, as found within humanities and social sciences in recent years. Practice-led research within craft science, represents a vital and ground-breaking field of inquiry, as an embodied subjective field of examination with an impressive ability to gain deep knowledge of various forms of skilled and/or natural practices. One aspect of practice that this research seems less able to grasp, is a broader practical connection between multiple ontologies of human and non-human practice. Going beyond a purely human phenomenology of craft, this article seeks a more symmetrical and post-anthropocentric approach to knowledge and materiality, as practice in multiple ontologies. This would mean a shift in how craft science view practice, from being a strictly operational aspect adhering to human practitioners, to practice as an ongoing more-than-human process by which phenomena (and practitioners) are brought into being and are maintained.
References
Andersson, D. T. (2001). Tingenes taushet, tingenes tale. Solum Forlag.
Bjerck, H. B. (2019). What could the 'sea ice machine' do to its people? On the lateglacial Doggerland, marine foraging, and the colonisation of Scandinavian seascapes. Environmental Archaeology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2019.1642673
Bogost, I. (2012). Alien Phenomenology, or What It's Like to Be a Thing. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001
Brattli, T. & Steffensen, M. (2014). Expertise and the formation of university museum collections. Journal of Nordic Museology, (1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.5617/nm.3034
Brattli, T. & Brendalsmo, J. (2016). Democracy and cultural heritage as dense discourse: An issue of multiplicity, complexity and unpredictability. In Guttormsen, T. S. & Swensen, G. (eds.), Heritage, Democracy and the Public: Nordic Approaches, 59-69. Routledge.
Bryant, L. (2011). The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities. https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.9750134.0001.001
Bryant, L. (2014). Onto-Cartography. An ontology of machines and media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Damsholt, T., Sørensen, D. G. (2009). Materialiseringer: Processer, relationer og performativitet. In Damsholt, T., Sørensen, D. G. & Mordhorst, C. (eds.). Materialiseringer: Nye perspektiver på materialitet og kulturanalyse, 9-38. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Candy, L. (2006). Practice-based research: A guide, Creativity & Cognition Studios. University of Technology, Sydney.
Fredengren, C. (2015). Nature:Culture:Heritage: Sustainability and Feminist Posthumanism. Current Swedish Archaeology, (23), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2015.09
Gibson, J. J. (2014/1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press Classic Editions. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
González-Ruibal, A. (2008). Time to Destroy, Current Anthropology 49(2), 247-279. https://doi.org/10.1086/526099
Groth, C. (2017). Making Sense Through Hands. Design and Craft Practice Analysed as Embodied Cognition. [Aalto university publication series Doctoral Dissertations 1/2017]. Aalto ARTS Books. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1481
Grusin, R. (2015). (ed.) The Nonhuman Turn. University of Minneapolis Press.
Harman, G. (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court.
Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Open Court.
Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and Time. (Macquarrie & Robinson, trans.). Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought, (Hofstadter, A., trans.). Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1982). Basic problems of phenomenology. Winter semester 1919/1920. (Hofstadtler, A., trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Høgseth, B. H. (2007). Håndverkerens redskapskasse: en undersøkelse av kunnskapsutøvelse i lys av arkeologisk bygningstømmer fra 1000-tallet. [Doctoral Diss. Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet]. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/242854
Ingold, T. (2000). The temporality of the landscape. In: The Perception of the Environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill, 189-208. Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2018). Five questions of skill. Cultural geographies 25(1), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017702514
Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material agency towards a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5(4), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001
Malm, A. (2018). The Progress of This Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. Verso.
Marchand, T. H. J. (2010). Making knowledge explorations of the indissoluble relation between mind, body and environment. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01607.x
Marchand, T. H. J. (2012). Knowledge in hand: explorations of brain, hand and tool. In Fardon, R., et al. (eds.). Handbook of Social Anthropology. 260-269. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201077.n54
Mäkelä, M. (2007). Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20(3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9028-2
Mäkelä, M, Nimkulrat, N., Dash, D. P., Nsenga, F.-X. (2011). On reflecting and making in artistic research, Journal of Research Practice, 7(1), Article E1. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/download/280/241?inline=1
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003/1945). Phenomenology of Perception. (Smith, C., trans.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions. The Sociological Review, 47(May), 47-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review. 83(4), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
Niedderer, K. (2013). Explorative materiality and knowledge: The role of creative exploration and artefacts in design research. FormAkademisk, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.651
Olsen, B. (2003). Material Culture after Text: Re-Membering Things. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36(2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650
Olsen, B. (2006). Ting-mennesker-samfunn: Introduksjon til en symmetrisk arkeologi. Arkeæologisk Forum, (14), 13-18. http://www.archaeology.dk/upl/12963/AF144.BjrnarOlsen.pdf
Olsen, B (2010). In Defence of Things. Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Altamira Press.
Olsen, B. & Witmore, L. (2015). Archaeology, symmetry, and the ontology of things: A response to critics. Archaeological Dialouges, 22(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203815000240
Pink, S. (2010) The future of sensory anthropology/the anthropology of the senses. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 18(3), 331-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2010.00119_1.x
Rust, C., Mottram, J. & Elshaw, M. (2007). Practice-led research in Art, Design and Architecture. Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Skar, Ø. (2016). Oversettelse av Martin Heidegger: Tingen. Filosofisk Supplement, (3), 54-64.
Sterling, C. (2020). Critical Heritage and the posthumanities: problems and prospects. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1715464
Smith, P. H., Meyers, A. R. W. & Cook, H. J. (2014). (eds.) Ways of making and knowing: the material culture of empirical knowledge. The University of Michigan Press.
Vennatrø R. (2005). Numedals Reffne - En sprekk i virkeligheten. Oppdagelsen av skjelettfunnet i Bølehula på fylkesgrensa mellom Sør- og Nord-Trøndelag. [Cand.philol thesis, Institutt for arkeologi og religionsvitenskap og Vitenskapsmuseet, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskaplige universitet, Trondheim].
Vennatrø, R. (2012). Arkeologi mellom oppdagelse og glemsel: Forståelsen av et funn i en sprekk i virkeligheten. Primitive Tider, (14), 121-133.
Webmoore, T. & Witmore, C. L. (2008). Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human: Things Relations under the Banner of a 'Social' Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650701698423
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ragnar Vennatrø , Harald Bentz Høgseth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.
Cited by
