You Have One New Message

Knitting intimacy for connecting opinions, people and the world

Authors

  • Bilge Merve Aktas Aalto University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4174

Keywords:

Knitting, Intimacy, Affordance, Workshop, design and crafts

Abstract

Knitting is often practiced as a group activity that takes place in the domestic environment. Besides the collectivity, using motifs with meanings has also facilitated communication between people. Building on these ideas, a workshop was designed to facilitate discussions about everyday concerns or experiences, both on personal and societal levels, to strengthen communication with the self and others. In the workshop, the thirteen participants were asked to design a motif to convey a message to themselves, to the group or to the society. Through a group discussion, the motifs stemming from personal experiences were knitted, shared and discussed. The topics emerging from the workshop indicates that knitting affords intimate exchanges between the self and others, and connects people by facilitating socio-political discussions, such as on environmental sustainability, women rights and self-development.

Author Biography

Bilge Merve Aktas, Aalto University

Post-doc Researcher

References

Aktaş, B.M. (2015). Interpreting Anatolian Crafts with Contemporary Design: Case of Handmade Socks [Master of Arts Thesis]. Koç University.

Aktaş, B.M. & Veryeri-Alaca, I. (2017). The Co-Knitting Project: A Proposal to Revive Traditional Handmade Socks in Turkey. The Journal of Modern Craft, 10(3), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496772.2017.1394524 https://doi.org/10.1080/17496772.2017.1394524

Barışta, H.Ö. (1988). Turkish Handicrafts. Ministry of Culture and Tourism Publications.

Barışta, H.Ö. (2001). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Halk İşlemeciliği. Kültür Bakanlığı, Yorum Matbaası.

Bernard, H.R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Altamira.

von Busch, O. (2010). Exploring net political craft: From collective to connective. Craft Research 1, 113–124, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.1.113_7 https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.1.113_7

Erbek, M., (2002). Çatalhöyük’ten Günümüze Anadolu Motifleri. Kültür Bakanlığı.

Fields, C.D. (2014). Not Your Grandma’s Knitting: The Role of Identity Processes in the Transformation of Cultural Practices. Social Psychology Quarterly. 77(2), 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514523624 https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514523624

Glăveanu, V. (2012). What Can be Done with an Egg? Creativity, Material Objects, and the Theory of Affordances. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.13 https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.13

Glăveanu, V. (2014). Distributed Creativity: thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Springer.

Greer, B. (2014). Craftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism. Arsenal Pulp Press.

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art & Architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055

Lehmann, A.S. (2015). The Matter of the Medium. Some Tools for an Art Theoretical Interpretation of Materials, In C. Anderson, A. Dunlop, P. H. Smith (Eds.), The Matter of Art: Materials, Technologies, Meanings 1200-1700, (pp. 21-41), Manchester University Press.

Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: a theory of material engagement. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001

Mason, R. (2005). The Meaning and Value of Home-based Craft. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(3), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00449.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00449.x

Niedderer, K. & Townsend, K. (2018). Making sense: Personal, ecological and social sustainability through craft. Craft Research, 9(2), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.9.2.195_2 https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.9.2.195_2

Özbel, K. (1976). Türk Köylü Çorapları. İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.

Pethney, B. A. (2008). Feminism, Activism, and Knitting: Are the Fiber Arts a Viable Mode for Feminist Political Action? Thirdspace: A journal of feminist theory & culture, 8(1).

Prigoda, E. & McKenzie P. (2007). Purls of wisdom: A collectivist study of human information behaviour in a public library knitting group. Journal of Documentation. 63(1), 90-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710723902 https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410710723902

Riley J., Corkhill B. & Morris C. (2013) The benefits of knitting for personal and social wellbeing in adulthood: findings from an international survey. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13603244419077 https://doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13603244419077

Williams, K.A. (2011). “Old Time Mem’ry’: Contemporary Urban Craftivism and the Politics of Doing-It-Yourself in Postindustrial America. Utopian Studies, 22(2), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.22.2.0303 https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.22.2.0303

Ørngreen R. & Levinsen K. (2017). Workshops as a Research Methodology. The Electronic Journal of eLearning 15(1), 70-81.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-10

How to Cite

Aktas, B. M. (2021). You Have One New Message: Knitting intimacy for connecting opinions, people and the world . FormAkademisk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4174

Cited by