Twist-hands and shuttle-kissing
Understanding Industrial Craft Skills via Embodied and Distributed Cognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4209Keywords:
Cognition, Industrial Craft, Embodiment, Know-how, Material EngagementAbstract
This paper seeks to understand the skills of operating automated manufacturing machines of the C19th as craft practices, employing externally powered and automated tools around which new cultures of practice emerged. We draw upon situated/embodied/enactive/extended/distributed (SEEED) approaches to cognition to explicate the sensibilities of these practices, as well as the history of science and technology, Anthropology, STS and related fields. Our case study is a body of work focused on embodied/ embedded knowledge in the textile industry – specifically in the making of machine lace. We conclude with a proposal for multi-modal museum exhibits that provide an understanding of know-how, kinesthetic/proprioceptive skills and procedures. The authors are both long term practitioners of crafts, both traditional and industrial (see bios). This experience informs the research at every step.
References
Felkin, W. (1867). A history of the machine wrought hosiery and lace manufacturers. Longmans, Green and Company.
Fisher, T. & Botticello J. (2016). Machine-made lace, the co-production of knowledge and the spaces of skilled practice. Cultural Geographies, 25(1), 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474016680106 https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474016680106
Haugeland, J. (1995). Mind embodied and embedded. In Y.-H. H. Houng & J. Ho (Eds.), Mind and Cognition: 1993 International Symposium (pp. 233-267). Academia Sinica.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705-715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x
Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Actions. Cognitive Science. 18, 513-549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
Kirsh, D. (2010). Comparing tangible and virtual exploration of archaeological objects. In M. Forte (Ed.) Cyber Archaeology BAR International Series, 2177 (pp119-124). Hadrian Books.
Klekot, E. (2020). The Craft of Factory Labour. The Journal of American Folklore, 133(528), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.133.528.0205 https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.133.528.0205
Malafouris, L. (2004). The cognitive basis of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden & C. Renfrew (Eds.) Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 53-62). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. D. Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: design, methodology, and applications. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995641 https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995641
O’Connor, E. (2007). Embodied knowledge in glassblowing: meaning and the struggle towards proficiency. In C. Shilling (Ed.), Embodying sociology: retrospect, progress and prospect (pp. 126-141). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00697.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00697.x
Penny, S. (2017). Making sense: cognition, computing, art and embodiment. MIT Press.
Penny, S. (2004). Representation, enaction and the ethics of simulation. In P. Harrigan & N. Wardrip-Fruin (Eds.) First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game (pp. 73-75). MIT Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press.
Samuel, R. (1977). The workshop of the world: steam power and hand technology in mid-Victorian Britain. History Workshop Journal, 3(1), 6–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/3.1.6 https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/3.1.6
Wood, R. E. (2013) The knitter's tale: a practice-led approach to framework knitting through a contemporary exploration of traditional practices, patterns, skills and stories [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Nottingham Trent University. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/190/1/217247_Rebekah%2520Wood%2520Thesis.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Simon Penny, Tom Fisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.
Cited by
