Framing the concept design literacy for a general public
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4639Keywords:
design literacy, literature review, critical innovation, general educationAbstract
Educating the general public to be design literate can be a catalyst for both environmental protection and degradation, human aid and human-made disasters depending on how the scope of design is framed – and how ‘design literacy’ is defined. This paper explores how to cultivate design literacy that supports critical innovation and a transition towards more sustainable societies. The research approach is a literature review of key texts that promote and conceptualize design literacy as part of general education. Four narratives are identified as vital: a) ‘Awareness through making’, b) ‘Empower for change and citizen participation’, c) ‘Address complexity of real-world problems’, and d) ‘Participate in design processes’. Moving towards more sustainable modes of consumption and production, a design literate general public provides a critical mass of users empowered to question how a new innovation supports the well-being of people and the planet and to voice their own ideas.
References
Archer, B. (2005). The Need for Design Education. In B. Archer, K. Baynes & P. Roberts (Eds.), A Framework for Design and Design Education. A reader containing papers from the 1970s and 80s (pp. 16-21). Data and Loughborough University. (Original work published 1973)
Biesta, G. J. J. (2008). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
Boehnert, J. (2015). Ecological literacy in design education: A theoretical introduction. FormAkademisk, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1405
Brookfield, S. (2010). Critical reflection as an adult learning process. In N. P. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of Reflection and Reflective Inquiry: Mapping a Way of Knowing for Professional Reflective Inquiry (pp. 215–236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85744-2_11
Canina, M., Coccioni, E., Anselmi, L., & Palmieri, S. (2013). Designing a creativity training plan for companies. In J. B. Reitan, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia, L. M. Nielsen, I. Digranes, & E. Lutnæs (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers: Design Learning for Tomorrow – Design Education from Kindergarten to PhD, (vol. 4, pp. 1907–1923). ABM-media. https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8893
Christensen, K. S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O. S., & Blikstein, P. (2016). Towards a formal assessment of design literacy: Analyzing K-12 students’ stance towards inquiry. Design Studies, 46, 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.002
Christensen, K. S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O. S., & Smith., R. C. (2019). Understanding design literacy in middle‑school education: Assessing students’ stances towards inquiry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9459-y
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357965
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
De Eyto, A. (2014). ‘Growing oak threes’-education for sustainable design: Building a sustainable design literacy in undergraduate and professional designers. In K. D. Thomas & H. E. Muga (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Pedagogical Innovations for Sustainable Development (pp. 584-604). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5856-1.ch030
Elmquist, T., Cornell, S., Öhman, M. C., Daw, T., Moberg, F., Norström, A., Persson, Å., Peterson, G., Rockström, J., Schultz, M., Török, E. H. (2014). Global sustainability and human prosperity: Contribution to the post-2015 agenda and the development of sustainable development goals. Nordisk Ministerråd. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2014-527
Formosa, K., & Kroeter, S. (2002). Toward design literacy in American management: A strategy for MBA programs. Design management journal, 13(3), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2002.tb00318.x
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Fry. T. (2009). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice. UNSW Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350036079
Giddens, A. (2011). The politics of climate change (2nd ed., rev. and updated ed.). Polity.
Green, M. (2014). Transformational design literacies: Children as active place-makers. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812305
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford University Press.
Illeris, H. (2012). Nordic contemporary art education and the environment: Construction an epistemological platform for art education for sustainable development (AESD). InFormation. Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 1(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.7577/information.v1i2.221
Intergovernmental panel on climate change. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. Summary for Policy Makers. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/07/SR15_SPM_High_Res.pdf
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338
Jones, V. (2013). STEM design literacy strategy: Capture natural curiosity. Children’s technology & Engineering, 18(1), 28-31.
Kim, B., & Bastani, R. (2018). Game design literacy as a problem-solving disposition. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS. 1743-1744
Kolko, J. (2018, 20 Aug.). We are illiterate [Blog]. The Modernist Studio. http://www.themoderniststudio.com/2018/08/20/we-are-illiterate/
Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Taylor & Francis.
Lerner, F. (2018). Visual-spatial art and design literacy as a prelude to aesthetic growth. The International Journal of Art and Design Education, 37(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12110
Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Intercultural adaptive expertise: Explicit and implicit lessons from Dr. Hatano. Human Development, 50(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097686
Mannion, G. (2003). Children’s participation in school grounds developments: Creating a place for education that promotes social inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(2), 1447–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110304784
Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epp037
Mateus-Berr, R., Boukhari, N., Burger, F., Finckenstein, A., Gesell, T., Gomez, M. … Verocai, J. (2013). Social design. In J. B. Reitan, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia, L.M. Nielsen, I. Digranes & E. Lutnæs (Eds.), Design Learning for Tomorrow. Design Education from Kindergarten to PhD. Proceedings from the 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers (vol. 1, pp. 431–441). ABM-media. https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8890
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1991). Beyond the limits: Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Earthscan Publications.
Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass.
Nielsen, L. M., & Brænne, K. (2013). Design literacy for longer-lasting products. Studies in Material Thinking, 9, 1–9. https://materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/SMT_V9_07_KarenBraenne_LivNielsen_0.pdf
Pacione, C. (2010). Evolution of the mind: A case for design literacy. Interactions, 17(2), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699777
Poggenpohl, S. (2008). Design literacy, discourse and communities of practice. Visible language, 42(3), 213-235.
Rahimi, F. B., Kim, B. (2018). The role of interest-driven participatory game design: considering design literacy within a technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9451-6
SANZ. (2009). Strong sustainability for New Zealand. Principles and scenarios. Nakedize.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Third edition. M.I.T. (Original work published 1969)
Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001
Stegall, N. (2006). Designing for Sustainability: A Philosophy for Ecologically Intentional Design. Design Issues, 22(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.2.56
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change (Vol. no. 6). Green Books for the Schumacher Society.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1997, November). A transdisciplinary vision for concerted action. http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_a/popups/mod01t05s01.html
United Nations. (2002). The Johannesburg declaration on sustainable development, 4 September 2002. http://www.un-documents.net/jburgdec.htm
United Nations Environment Program. (2011). Visions for change: Recommendations for effective policies on sustainable lifestyles. http://unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1321xPA-VisionsForChange%20report.pdf
Vande Zande, R. (2013). K-12 design education, creativity, and the corporate world. In J. B. Reitan, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia, L. M. Nielsen, I. Digranes, & E. Lutnæs (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers: Design Learning for Tomorrow – Design Education from Kindergarten to PhD, (vol. 4, pp. 2185–2195). ABM-media. https://hdl.handle.net/10642/8893
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eva Lutnæs
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.
Cited by
