Change and Transformation of Functions in Turkey’s Felt Objects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5444Keywords:
wool felting, material culture, felting, traditional textiles, felt, identitiesAbstract
This study analyses felt and the practice of felting from the geography of Turkey, as a way to explore felt’s function in material culture. Felting is a method of craft making that consists of compressing fibres (wool or other). Felt, (in Turkish “keçe”) can be defined as the outcome product of felting process. However, keçe represents more than just a cloth or a textile. It was an important part of daily life in the geography of Turkey, for instance among nomads who produced their daily necessities from felt. For the study, first, I introduce some felt products from Turkey. Afterwards, I share the processes and results of a field study, through observations and interviews conducted with feltmakers in Tire region in Turkey. Then I share an analysis and results from the product research and field study. Nowadays felt is found through another range of accessories and artistic works, such as decorational products, hair bands, slippers, vase, tumbler, hats. While felt was commonly used for important functions such as carrying, moving; today, other materials are used for these functions. Therefore, felt objects can be perceived and bought as accessories rather than necessities in modern culture. Nevertheless, felt is still used for the representation of identities. Although felt is considered to have lost its value, for the context of Turkey, I argue that the functions have shifted to new contexts. Through different functionalities such as being tools for self-expressions/communication, felt has a similar value in the current culture.
References
Akyürek, B. Y. (2016). Geçmi̇şten Günümüze Yün Li̇fi̇ Ve Keçe Kullaniminin İncelenmesi̇ Ve Kepenek Üreti̇mi̇. 4. Yöresel Ürünler Sempozyumu ve Uluslararası Kültür Sanat Etkinlikleri Bildiri Kitabı [Examination of Wool Fiber and Felt Use from Past to Present and Cloth Production. 4th Local Products Symposium and International Culture and Art Events Proceedings Book]. http://apbs.mersin.edu.tr/files/banuyilmaza/Scientific_Meetings_004.pdf
Ağça, Ö.& Akbulut, D. (2018). Maddi Kültür Ve Teknoloji Etkileşiminde Yeni Endüstriyel Konargöçerlik. UTAK 2018 Üçüncü Ulusal Tasarım Araştırmaları Konferansı: Tasarım ve Umut Bildiri Kitabı, 45- [New Industrial Nomadism in the Interaction of Material Culture and Technology. UTAK 2018 Third National Design Research Conference: Design and Hope Proceedings, 45].
Aktaş, B. M. (2018). Material as the Co-designer: Exploring a new practice in the nature and at the studio. Research in Arts and Education, (3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.54916/rae.118873
Aktaş, B. M., & Mäkelä, M. (2019). Negotiation between the maker and material: Observations on material interactions in felting studio. International Journal of Design, 13(2), 55-67. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/3267/857
Baltacı, İ. (2016). Şanlıurfa Tepme Keçeciliğinin Yeni Tasarımlarda Kullanılması [Using Şanlıurfa Recoil Felt Craft in New Designs][PhD thesis.]. Gazi University.
Begiç, H. N. (2014). Gelenekteki Değişim ve Keçecilik Sanatı [Change in the tradition and the art of feltmaking] [Master's thesis.]. Hacettepe University.
Bocock, R. (2008). Consumption. Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203131091
Buckley, C. & Clark, H. (2012). Conceptualizing fashion in everyday lives. Design Issues, 28(4), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00172
Cerwonka, A., & Malkki, L. H. (2008). Improvising Theory. In Improvising Theory. University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226100289.001.0001
Clay, E. S. (2013). A material-led investigation into the creative potential of British 'waste' wools for fine craft felt-making [Doctoral dissertation]. Bath Spa University.
Civelek, Y. (2017). Ferdiyetçilik, Kolektivizm ve Sanayi Üçgeninde Sanat ve Zanaat: "Geleneksel Sanatlar" Meselesinin Avrupa'da Yükselişi ve Düşüşü [The Arts and Crafts in the Triangle of Individualism, Collectivism and Industrialism: The Rise and Fall of the “Traditional Arts” Ideal in Europe]. FSM İlmî Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, (10), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.16947/fsmia.372589
Çeliker, D . (2011). Geçmişten Günümüze Türklerde Keçecilik Ve Keçe Yapımında Yeni Teknikler [Turkish Craft Of Felt Making From The Past To The Present And New Techniques In Felt Making]. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 4(8), 1-22. http://dergipark.gov.tr/sduarte/issue/20727/221473
Dormer, P. (1997). The Culture of Craft: Status and Future. Manchester University Press.
Felt. (n.d.). In Merriam-Wesbter Dictionary. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/felt
Gadamer, H-G.(1999). Truth and Method (2nd ed. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum.
Gumus Ciftci, H., & Walker, S. (2017). Design for Grassroots Production in Eastern Turkey through the Revival of Traditional Handicrafts. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2991-S3004.,
https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352808
Gür, S. (2012). Anadolu'nun Sanat Objesine Dönüşen Kültürel Değeri Keçe [Felt-Anatolian Cultural Value: Being Changed into an Art Object]. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 1173-1181.
Kucukkurt, U. (2018). Afyonkarahi̇sar Merkez'de Keçe Üreti̇mi̇ Ve Keçe Atölyeleri̇ [Felt making and felting craft workshop in city center of Afyonkarahı̇sar]. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi.
Ovacık, M. (2015). Sağduyulu Dişil Yaratıcılık: Zanaat, Onarım ve Dönüşüm [Farseeing Feminine Creativity: Craft, Repair, and Transformation]. In Ş. Kipöz (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir Moda. Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
Ovacik, M. & Gumuser, T. (2016). Geçmişten Günümüze Keçe: Ayfer Güleç İş Modeli Üzerine Bir Analiz [Felt from Past to Present: An Analysis on Ayfer Güleç’s Bussiness Model]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi GÜZEL SANATLAR FAKÜLTESİ (Yedi), (15), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.17484/yedi.19409
Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. Yale University Press.
Sevinç, B. & Oyman, N. R. (2016). KEÇE ÜZERİNE FARKLI YÜZEY DÜZENLEME TEKNİLERİ İLE GİYİLEBİLİR SANAT ÜRÜNLERİ [Editing Technigues With Different Surfaces On Felt Wearable Art Products]. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi , 6(13). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iujad/issue/45229/566481
Soysaldi, A. (2008). Toros Türkmenlerinde Keçecilik. Türk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi [Feltmaking among Taurus Turkmens
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Berilsu Tarcan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.
Cited by
