From an Embodied Understanding to Ethical Considerations during Creative Practice

Priska  Falin; Petra Falin; Maarit Mäkelä

doi:10.7577/formakademisk.5482

Authors

Priska Falin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7955-3796
Petra Falin University of Lapland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-2767
Maarit Mäkelä Aalto University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-5262

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5482

Keywords:

creative processes, ethics, design education, material-based practices, embodied understanding

Abstract

This paper discusses material-based creative processes in the context of higher education. The focus is on the ethical aspects related to material considerations during the iterative phases of personal projects. We explore how personal feelings and an embodied understanding of the material world influence decisions on how and why we engage with different materials during creative processes. Recent trends in material-based research aim to explore the relationships between humans and materials, examining them as equal members in research and thus challenging the top-down perception of materials as mere resources for human needs. However, this kind of approach to research and material-based creative practices requires ethical considerations that reach not only the human but also the non-human world. In this paper, we open this discussion by examining design students’ creative processes, which unfold an understanding of ethics in relation to non-humans. We build on data consisting of documentation, reflections and outcomes derived from the creative processes of four MA-level students and discuss a number of complementing ethical guidelines for art, culture and earth systems. The paper uses ‘ethically disturbing moments’ as an analytical tool for looking into students’ material choices in their creative processes. The four selected processes open up a personal connection to materials that results in ethical considerations during the creative practice and thus reveal the need for discussing material-focused ethics in the context of craft, design and art education. Personal aspects related to materials are discussed as embodied understanding and are seen to affect the ethics of engaging with materials.

References

Aktaş, B. (2020). Entangled fibres: An examination of human-material interaction (Publication No. 163/2020) [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-64-0086-0

All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity – Revised Edition 2023. ALLEA / All European Academies. http://www.doi.org/10.26356/ECOC

Alvesson, M. (2009). At-home ethnography: Struggling with closeness and closure. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels & F. H. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of everyday life (pp. 156–174). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446278925.n9

Arlander, A., & Elo, M. (2017). Ekologinen näkökulma taidetutkimukseen. [An ecological perspective on research in the arts]. Tiede & Edistys, 42(4,) 335–346. https://doi.org/10.51809/te.105271

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w

Di Capua, G., & Peppoloni, S. (2019). Defining geoethics. International Association for Promoting Geoethics. Retrieved June 13, 2023, from http://www.geoethics.org/definition

Falin, P. (2022). Relating to clay: Tuning in to the workings of the aesthetic dimension in ceramic practice (Publication No. 116/2022) [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-64-0912-2

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK guidelines 2019 (2nd ed.). Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK 3/2019.

Forum Artis (2023, June 10). Ethical guidelines for the art and culture sector. The Freedom and Responsibility. http://www.eettinentaide.fi

Fredriksen, B. C., & Groth, C. (2022). Expanding environmental awareness in education through the arts: Crafting-with the environment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4855-8

Gaski, H., & Guttorm, G. (2022). Duodji reader: Twelve essays on duodji by Sámi writers. Davvi Girji.

Groth, C., & Mäkelä, M. (2016). The knowing body in material exploration. Studies in Material Thinking, 14(2), 1–21.

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055

Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00875

Kinnunen, V., & Valtonen, A. (Eds.). (2017). Living ethics in a more-than-human world. The University of Lapland. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-337-046-3

Kokkonen, T. (2017). Esityksen mahdollinen luonto: suhde ei-inhimilliseen esitystapahtumassa keston ja potentiaalisuuden näkökulmasta [The potential nature of performance: The relationship to the non-human in the performance event from the perspective of duration and potentiality] (Publication No. 48) [Doctoral dissertation, The Theatre Academy Helsinki]. Acta Scenico 48.

Kosonen, K., & Mäkelä, M. (2012). Designing platform for exploring and reflecting creative process. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.559

Laamanen, T-K., Mäkelä, M., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2023). Material-led creative processes in the context of design education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00061_1

Latva-Somppi, R., Mäkelä, M., Lindströn, K., & Ståhl, Å. (2021). Entangled materialities. Caring for soil communities at glass industry sites. FormAkademisk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4180

Lindström, K., & Ståhl, Å. (2020). Un/making in the aftermath of design. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Manizales, Colombia, 16(1). 12–21 https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385012

Mäkelä, M., & Aktaş, B. (2022). In dialogue with the environment: The environment, creativity, materials and making. Craft Research, 13(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00064_1

Mäkelä, M., & Aktaş, B. (2023). Learning with the natural environment: How walking with nature can actively shape creativity and contribute to holistic learning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(4), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12447

Mäkelä, M., & Löytönen, T. (2017). Rethinking materialities in higher education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(2), 241–528. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.16.2.241_1

Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in the more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2753906700002096

Rynning, M. (2023). Missing species: Discursive design activism. In S. Holmlid, V. Rodrigues, C. Westin, P. G. Krogh, M. Mäkelä, D. Svanaes & Å. Wikberg-Nilsson (Eds.), Nordes 2023: This Space Intentionally Left Blank, 12-14 June, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden. NORDES. https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2023.23