Boatbuilding and urban genesis
Knowledge creation and transfer in traditional boatbuilding craft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5490Keywords:
Boatbuilding, knowledge production, creativity, Craft tradition, Intangible heritageAbstract
Traditional boatbuilding today is a fading craft, raising questions of not only how to preserve this craft and reconstruct and transmit the knowledge and skills related to it to future generations but also, considering new technologies and available materials, why its preservation and perpetuation are important. Answering these questions requires a valorisation framework for the traditional boatbuilding craft and its methods of construction, considering the fact that traditional boatbuilding is the essence of modern shipbuilding and inextricably linked to the development and transmission of knowledge in city making too. To help create this framework, this paper addresses two distinct ways of thinking involved in making boats: one tied to boats made from already existing models or designs and the other to boats created ex nihilo with the help of sesto and garbo tools. Through a historical and theoretical examination and by building on the empirical case study of traditional boatbuilding in wood in the Mediterranean, this paper explores the concept of constructing boats ex nihilo in the technical, socio-economic, and spatial sense, shedding the light on the creativity inherent in shipbuilding and its implications. This paper will contribute to understanding how knowledge transmission in traditional boatbuilding has progressed and the role this knowledge model can play in shipbuilding development, offering a valuable resource also for those interested in development and transmission of alternative models of knowledge production.
References
Adams, J. (2001). Ships and boats as archaeological source material. World Archaeology, 32(3), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240120048644
Adams, J. (2013). A maritime archaeology of ships: Innovation and social change in medieval and early modern Europe (1st ed.). Oxbow Books.
Anderson, A. (2010). The origins and development of seafaring: Towards a global approach. In A. Anderson, J. Barrett, & K. Boyle (Eds.), The global origins and development of seafaring (pp. 3–16). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Community, economic creativity, and organization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545490.001.0001
Bonazzi, M. (2023). Il naufragio di Ulisse: Un viaggio nella nostra crisi [The shipwreck of Ulysses: A journey into our crisis.]. Einaudi.
Bogdanović, B. (1966). Urbanističke mitologeme [Urban mythologems]. Vuk Karadžić.
Camilleri, A. (2019). Conversazione su Tiresia [Conversation on Tiresias]. Selerio Editore.
Cantarella, E. (2004). Itaca [Ithaca]. Feltrinelli.
Cantarella, E. (2010). Sopporta, cuore: La scelta di Ulisse [Endure, heart: Ulysses' choice]. Laterza.
Cantarella, E. (2011). I miti di fondazione [The foundation myths]. Laterza.
Evans, R. (2000). The projective cast: Architecture and its three geometries. MIT Press.
Knapp, B. A. (2018). Seafaring and seafarers in the bronze age Eastern Mediterranean. Sidestone Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Nowacki, H., & Lefèvre, W. (Eds.). (2009). Creating shapes in civil and naval architecture: A cross-disciplinary comparison. Brill Academic Pub. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004173453.i-447
Nowacki, H., & Valleriani, M. (Eds.). (2003). Shipbuilding practice and ship design methods from the Renaissance to the 18th century: A workshop report. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte.
McEwen, I. K. (1993). Socrates' ancestor: An essay on architectural beginnings. MIT Press.
Oleson, J. P. (2014). The evolution of harbor engineering in the ancient Mediterranean world. In S. Ladstätter, F. Pirson, & T. Schmidts (Eds.), Harbors and harbor cities in the Eastern Mediterranean from antiquity to the Byzantine period: Recent discoveries and current approaches (pp. 509–522). Ege Yayinlari.
Patai, R. (1998). The children of Noah: Jewish seafaring in ancient times. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691225296
Polanyi, M., & Sen, A. (2009). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.
Pomey, P. (2011). Defining a ship: Architecture, function and human space. In A. Catsambis, B. Ford, & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of maritime archaeology (pp. 25–46). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375176.013.0001
Steffy, R. J. (1994). Wooden ship building and the interpretation of shipwrecks. Texas A & M University Press.
Sersic, J. (2015). The craftsmen's labyrinth and geographies of creativity (Geographica 7). Kulturgeografiska Institutionen.
Sersic, J., & De Munck, B. (2023). The emergence of cartographic reasoning in a long-term perspective: Urban knowledge, craft corporations and body politics. In B. De Munck, & J. Lachmund (Eds.), Politics of urban knowledge. Historical perspectives on the shaping and governing cities (pp. 29–55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312628-3
Rieth, E. (2009). ‘To design’ and ‘to build’ medieval ships (fifth to fifteenth centuries) – the application of knowledge held in common with civil architecture, or in isolation? In H. Nowacki, & W. Lefèvre (Eds.). Creating shapes in civil and naval architecture: A cross-disciplinary comparison (pp. 164–192). Brill Academic Pub. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004173453.i-447
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jasna Sersic
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.