Digital technology in arts and craft

- a changing teacher role

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5518

Keywords:

arts and craft, subject didactics, digital competence, teacher role, artificial intelligence

Abstract

In 2017, Norway’s first Framework for Teachers' Professional Digital Competence (PfDK) was established. The aim was to create a shared understanding of what was expected from teachers in digital environments and to enhance their digital competence. The initial version of the framework introduced four roles that teachers are expected to adopt interchangeably: transmitter, facilitator, participant, and leader. This article presents an a/r/tographic exploration of what these roles entail for art and crafts teachers. The study is based on the premise that certain challenges emerge for teachers in art and crafts that do not arise to the same degree in other subjects. This is attributed to the subject's unique nature as a creative, hands-on, and practical discipline, where digital technology introduces a distinct form of materiality. In the article, I employ the four roles from the initial version of the framework as analytical tools to examine how these roles influenced a project in a first-grade classroom, where digital technology was central. The analysis focuses on how the different roles prompted various dynamics and illuminated specific challenges for the role of the art and crafts teacher in digital environments.

 

Author Biography

Anne Elmies-Vestergren, University of Agder

PhD Student, Department of Visual Arts and Drama

 

References

Ball, S.J. & Grimaldi, E. (2022). Neoliberal education and the neoliberal digital classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1963980

Bergman, S. (2022). Kopiering og deling i faget Kunst og håndverk [Doktoravhandling, Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge]. USN Open Archive. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3026909

Bergviken-Rensfeldt, A. & Player-Koro, C. (2020). “Back to the future”: Socio-technical imaginaries in 50 years of school digitalization curriculum reforms. Seminar.net. 16(2):20. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4048

Blaker, V. (2021). Samtaler om samtidskunst. Nasjonalt senter for kunst og kultur i opplæringen. https://kunstkultursenteret.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Samtale-om-samtidskunst-endelig-versjon-2021.pdf

Blikstad-Balas, M. (2023). ICT in the Classroom – Didactical Challenges for Practitioners and Researchers. I F. Ligozat, K. Klette & J.Almqvist (Red.). Didactics in a Changing World European Perspectives on Teaching, Learning and the Curriculum (s. 217–235). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20810-2_13

Carlson, M. & Schmidt, U. (2012). Pulse on pulse: modulation and signification in Rafael Lozano-Hemmer's Pulse Room. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 4(1), 18152. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v4i0.18152

Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Elmies-Vestergren, A. (2023). Nettbrett i kunst og håndverk – et didaktisk utforskende prosjekt i en førsteklasse, inspirert og utfordret av digital samtidskunst. FormAkademisk, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5207

Fossheim, H. J. (2015, 17. juni). Samtykke. Den nasjonale forskningsetiske komité for samfunnsvitenskap og humaniora. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/ressurser/fbib/personvern/samtykke/

Harris, J., & Koehler, M. & Mishra, P. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Irwin, R. L. (2013). Becoming A/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 54(3), 198–215.. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2013.11518894

Kelentrić, M., Helleland, K. & Arstorp, A. (2017). Rammeverk for lærerens profesjonsfaglige digitale kompetanse. Utdanningsdirektoratet: Senteret for IKT i utdanning. https://www.udir.no/contentassets/081d3aef2e4747b096387aba163691e4/pfdkrammeverk-2018.pdf

Klungland, M. (2022). Materiell-kollektiv praksis som pedagogisk tilnærming for kunst og håndverk. I L. Skregelid, & K. Nødvedt Knudsen (Red.), Kunstens betydning? Utvidede perspektiver på kunst og barn & unge (s. 95–116). Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.163.ch4

Klungland, M. (2023). Romtidmaterialisering og subjektivering: Kunst- og håndverksdidaktikk under posthumane betingelser. FormAkademisk, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4799

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2017). 2.1 Digitale ferdigheter som grunnleggende ferdighet. Fastsatt som forskrift. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet 2020. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/rammeverk/rammeverk-for-grunnleggende-ferdigheter/2.1-digitale-ferdigheter/

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2019a). Framtid, fornyelse og digitalisering. Digitaliseringsstrategi for grunnopplæringen 2017–2021. Regjeringen. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/framtid-fornyelse-og-digitalisering/id2568347/

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2019b). Læreplan i kunst og håndverk (KHV01-02). Fastsatt som forskrift. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet 2020. https://www.udir.no/lk20/khv01-02/om-faget/grunnleggende-ferdigheter?lang=nob

Leonardi, P. M. (2010). Digital materiality how artifacts without matter matter. First Monday, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3036

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G. & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New media & society, 20(3), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G. & Stoilova, M. (2021). The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people’s lives and wellbeing: A systematic evidence review. New media & society, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043189

McGarr, O., Mifsud, L. & Rubio, J.C.C. (2021). Digital competence in teacher education: comparing national policies in Norway, Ireland and Spain. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(4), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1913182

Pink, S. & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.66

Sikt. (2021). Forsking på sårbare grupper. https://sikt.no/tjenester/personverntjenester-forskning/personvernhandbok-forskning/forskning-pa-sarbare-grupper

Springgay, S., Irwin, R.L., Kind, S.W. (2005). A/r/tography as Living Inquiry Through Art and Text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280696

Triggs, V., Irwin, R.L. & Leggo, C. (2014). Walking art: Sustaining ourselves as arts educators. Visual Inquiry, 3(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1386/vi.3.1.21_1

Unesco. (2023). World Teachers’ Day: UNESCO sounds the alarm on the global teacher shortage crisis. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/world-teachers-day-unesco-sounds-alarm-global-teacher-shortage-crisis

Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2022). Utdanningsspeilet 2022. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/publikasjoner/utdanningsspeilet/utdanningsspeilet-2022/den-digitale-tilstanden-i-skole-og-barnehage/

Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2023). Informasjon. Grunnskolens Informasjonssystem (GSI). https://gsi.udir.no/informasjon/

Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2024). Rammeverk for lærerens profesjonsfaglige digitale kompetanse (PfDK). https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/digitalisering/rammeverk-larerens-profesjonsfaglige-digitale-komp/

Utdanningsforbundet. (2022). Kart: Her mangler lærerne. https://www.utdanningsforbundet.no/var-politikk/utdanningsforbundet-mener/artikler/larerutdannede-larere-til-alle-elever/kart-her-mangler-larerne/

Whitelaw, M. (2011, 10. april). After the screen. Array aesthetics and transmateriality. The Teening Void. http://teemingvoid.blogspot.com/2011/04/after-screen-array-aesthetics-and.html

Stillbilde av elevarbeid i workshop: grønn figur på gult fundament.

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Elmies-Vestergren, A. (2024). Digital technology in arts and craft : - a changing teacher role. FormAkademisk, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5518

Cited by