Current Perspectives of Design Thinking and Design Literacy
Rethinking Design Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.6073Keywords:
design literacy, design thinking, design education, Higher Education, design inquiryAbstract
Design thinking has become a cornerstone of 21st-century education and is emphasized across both design and non-design disciplines. Studies have long criticized design thinking as ambiguous because it has diverse definitions and employs a range of methodologies. Recently, the concept of design literacy has entered the literature. It is proposed that design literacy can foster the potential of design thinking to promote the development of the “new literacies” needed to drive change and transformation in an age facing global challenges such as climate change, technological transformations, and social inequality. This article highlights key themes from an international symposium exploring design’s foundational role in education, its connection to visual thinking and reasoning, the potential of interdisciplinary problem-solving, the human and social dimensions of design thinking, and the importance of design literacy for effective communication and collaboration among designers. This symposium is part of a broader research project based at Özyeğin University, Turkey, investigating how to cultivate design literacy knowledge and skills in early undergraduate curricula to foster an interdisciplinary and trans-professional learning environment before professional specialization.
References
Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1
Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., Franz, J., & Strickfaden, M. (2019). Making pedagogic sense of design thinking in the higher education context. Open Education Studies,1, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0006 https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0006
Bolin, P. E. (2004). Bordering the familiar: Drawing education legislation in the Northeastern United States, 1871-1876. Studies in Art Education, 45(2), 101- 116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2004.11651760 https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2004.11651760
Bolinas, J. (2022). Mapping current research and future directions of Design Literacy with systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR). Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 27(2), 92-114. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/3104
Bolinas, J. C., & Torrisi-Steele, G. (2022). From making things to making meaning: The imperative of design literacy in higher education. International Journal of Adult Education and Technology, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.313432 https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.313432
Buchanan, R. (Spring, 1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637 https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Cephas, J., Marjanovic, I., & Miljački, A. (Eds.). (October 2022). Special Issue: Pedagogies for a Broken World. Journal of Architectural Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2022.2097491 https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2022.2097491
Christensen, K. S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O S., & Blikstein, P. (2016). Towards a formal assessment of design literacy: Analyzing K-12 students' stance towards inquiry. Design Studies, 46,125-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.002
Conley, C. (2004). Leveraging design's core competencies. Design Management Review, 15(3), 45 – 51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2004.tb00171.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2004.tb00171.x
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
Dakers, J. R. (Ed.). (2006). Defining technological literacy: towards an epistemological framework. Palgrave, Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983053
Dewey, J. (1980 [1934]). Art as experience. TarcherPerigee.
Elkins, J. (2009). Visual literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939574 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939574
European Commission: Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, Koskinen, T. and Thomson, M., Design for growth & prosperity – Report and recommendations of the European Design Leadership Board, T. Koskinen, and M. Thomson (Eds.), Publications Office, 2012, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2769/52223
Fitz, A., Krasny, E., & Wien, A. (2019). Critical care: Architecture and urbanism for a broken planet. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12273.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12273.001.0001
Harvard Business Review. (2015, September 1). The evolution of design thinking.
Hegemen, J. (2008, April 18). The core competencies of design. http://jamin.org/core-competencies-of-design/
IDEO. (2023, January 4). Design thinking for educators. https://www.ideo.com/post/design-thinking-for-educators.
Iskander, N. (2018). Design thinking is fundamentally conservative and preserves the status quo. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/09/design-thinking-is-fundamentally-conservative-and-preserves-the-status-quo
Jen, N. (2017). Design thinking is bullshit. New York NY: Adobe 99U Conference. https://www.reddit.com/r/graphic_design/comments/7ar435/natasha_jen_design_thinking_is_bullshit/?rdt=38188
Jessen, D., & Quadflieg (2023). Towards contingency: How design literacy empowers pluralistic worldviews and enhances transitional design. Temes de Disseny, 39, 92–113. https://doi.org/10.46467/TdD39.2023.92-113 https://doi.org/10.46467/TdD39.2023.92-113
Julier, G., & Kimbell, L. (2019). Keeping the system going: Social design and the reproduction of inequalities in neoliberal times. Design Issues, 35(4), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00560 https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00560
Knowles, T. (Winter 2007-2008). The limbs limn. Cabinet. https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/28/knowles.php
Kolko, J. (2018). The divisiveness of design thinking. ACM Interactions. Interactions, 25,(3), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194313 https://doi.org/10.1145/3194313
Lawson, B. (1990). How designers think: The design process demystified (1st ed.). Eastview Editions. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-0268-6.50005-X https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-0268-6.50007-3
Lee, K. (2021). Critique of design thinking in organizations: Strongholds and shortcomings of the making paradigm. she Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.10.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.10.003
Lutnæs, E. (2020). Empowering responsible design literacy. RChD: creación y pensamiento, 5(8), 11–22 doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-837X.2020.56120 https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-837X.2020.56120
Lutnæs, E. (2021). Exploring practices of critical design literacy. A comparative study of two lower secondary school design project. In E. Bohemia, L. M. Nielsen, L. Pan, N. A. G. Z. Börekçi & Y. Zhang (Eds.), Learn X Design 2021: Engaging with challenges in design education, 24-26 September, Shandong University of Art & Design, Jinan, China. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs_lxd2021.05.138 https://doi.org/10.21606/drs_lxd2021.05.138
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business. Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.
McKim, R. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Morehen, J., Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2013). Teaching design thinking and design led innovation to non-designers: a tertiary facilitator multidisciplinary study. In J. Cai, T. Lockwood, C. Wang, G. Y. Tong, & J. Liu (Eds.), Proceedings 2013 IEEE Tsinghua International Design Management Symposium: Design-Driven Business Innovation (pp. 55–63), IEEE, Shenzhen, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIDMS.2013.6981215 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIDMS.2013.6981215
Muratovski, G. (2015). Paradigm shift: Report on the new role of design in business and society. she Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 118–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.11.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.11.002
Narey, M. (2009). Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2
Özkar, M. (2017). Rethinking basic design in architectural education: Foundations past and future. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740003 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740003
Pacione, C. (2010). Evolution of the mind: A case for design literacy. Interactions, 17(2), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699777 https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699777
Pacione, C. (2017). Let’s do right by design by helping everyone else do design right. Design Management Review, 28(4), 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.12098 https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.12098
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429 https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4,155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Roger, M. (2019). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review Press.
Ross, D. (1907). A theory of pure design: Harmony, balance, rhythm. Boughton, Mifflin and Company.
Rowe, P. G. (1987) Design thinking. The MIT Press.
Scheer, A., & Plattner, H. (2011). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
Schön, D. A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1993). Learning to design and designing to learn. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 6(1), 55-70. https://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/view/767
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.
Tuckwell, D. (2017). (Still) Educating design thinking. Communication Design, 5(1–2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/20557132.2017.1385257 https://doi.org/10.1080/20557132.2017.1385257
Wrigley, C. & Straker, K. (2017) Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214 https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214
Wrigley, C. & Mosely, G. (2022). Design thinking pedagogy: Facilitating innovation and impact in tertiary education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003006176 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003006176
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Derya Yorgancioglu, Esin Kömez Dağlıoğlu, Yeşim Çapa Aydın
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
The material will be published OpenAccess with a Creative Commons 4.0 License which allows anyone to read, share and adapt the content, even commercially under the licence terms:
This work needs to be appropriately attributed/credited, a link must be provided to the CC-BY 4.0 licence, and changes made need to be indicated in a reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Cited by
