Exporting Finnish teacher education: Transnational pressures on national models


  • Jennifer Chung St Mary's University Twickenham




Finland, PISA, education policy, export, teacher education


This article analyses empirical data to assess the possible transfer of Finnish teacher education policy, and more specifically, the university training school, into another context. Transnational organisations increasingly pressure nation-states to carry out education policy change, especially due to dissatisfaction with international assessment outcomes. As a high performer in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), administered by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Finland has been at the centre of international attention. PISA revealed that the high quality of Finnish teachers contributes to the overall calibre of the country’s education system. Thus, Finnish teacher education has become a model for other education systems. This article uses empirical research to explore the export possibilities of the Finnish normaalikoulu, or university training school. It implements qualitative methodology, using semi-structured interviews with Finnish educationalists to explore the possible export of Finnish education, the implications in terms of policy transfer, and the migration of ideas, specifically the university-affiliated, teacher training school. The export and migration of Finnish education and its impact on education policy are discussed in this article, along with educational export’s position in transnational policy formation.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jennifer Chung, St Mary's University Twickenham



Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.

Beech, J. (2006). The theme of educational transfer in comparative education: A view over time. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2006.1.1.2

Chung, J. (2009). An investigation of reasons for Finland’s success in PISA. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Crossley, M. (2000). Bridging cultures and traditions in the reconceptualisation of comparative and international education. Comparative Education, 36(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/713656615

Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory, 50(4), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00427.x

Dale, R. & Robertson, S. L. (2002). The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 10-36. https://doi.org/10.1086/324052

Dall, A. (2011). Is PISA counter-productive to building successful educational systems? Social Alternatives, 30(4), 10-14.

Department for Education. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. Crown Copyright.

Drever, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research. Glasgow: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.

Green, A. (2003). Education, globalisation and the role of comparative research. London Review of Education, 1(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460306686

Halpin, D., & Troyna, B. (1995). The politics of education policy borrowing. Comparative Education, 31(3), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069528994

Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2009). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1086/648471

Kemmis, S., & Heikkinen, H. L. T. (2012). Future perspectives: Peer-group mentoring and international practices for teacher development. In H. L. T. Heikkinen, H. Jokinen & P. Tynjälä (Eds.), Peer-Group Mentoring for Teacher Development (pp. 144-170). London: Routledge.

Kim, M., Lavonen, J., & Ogawa, M. (2009). Experts’ opinions on the high achievement of scientific literacy in PISA 2003: A comparative study in Finland and Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), 379-393.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

McKinsey (2007). How the world’s best performing schools come out on top. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/how-the-worlds-best-performing-schools-come-out-on-top/

Moutsios, S. (2009). International organisations and transnational education policy. Compare, 39(4), 467-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920802156500

Noah, H. J. (1984). The use and abuse of comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 28(4), 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1086/446467

Ochs, K. (2006). Cross-national policy borrowing and educational innovation: Improving achievement in the London borough of barking and Dagenham. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 599-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976304

OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume 1). Paris: OECD.

Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500391462

Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495

Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2006). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method and practice. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: The Cromwell Press.

Pongratz, L. A. (2006). Voluntary self-control: Education reform as a governmental strategy. Education Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00205.x

Punch, K. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: SAGE.

Raiker, A. (2011). Finnish university training schools: Principles and pedagogy. Luton: University of Bedfordshire

Rappleye, J. (2006). Theorizing educational transfer: Toward a conceptual map of the context of cross-national attraction. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(3), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2006.1.3.223

Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2000). Globalization and education: Complexities and contingencies. Educational Theory, 50(4), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2000.00419.x

Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930601158919

Sahlberg, P. (2009). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 323-348). Dordrecht: Springer.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y

Thomas, G. (2009). How to do your research project. London: SAGE.

Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. London: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226805054.001.0001

Yore, L. D., Anderson, J. O., & Chiu, M-H. (2010). Moving PISA results into the policy arena: Perspectives on knowledge transfer for future considerations and preparations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9211-x




How to Cite

Chung, J. (2017). Exporting Finnish teacher education: Transnational pressures on national models. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2129