Introducing the PEAT model to frame professional digital competence in teacher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4226

Keywords:

Professional digital competence, Teacher education, Attitudes, Ethics

Abstract

This paper puts forward a case for using the PEAT model in teacher education, a framework designed to capture the different dimensions of teachers’ professional digital competence (PDC). The model arose from an Erasmus+ funded project exploring digital competence in teacher education. While existing frameworks and conceptualisations of teachers’ digital competence exist, this paper argues that the PEAT model has unique affordances and characteristics. This paper outlines the importance of digital competence before exploring how it is currently conceptualised in teacher education. Following this, some of the current frameworks encapsulating the elements of teachers’ professional digital competence are briefly presented. Finally, the paper presents the PEAT framework and discusses its unique affordances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-Based Research and Educational Technology: Rethinking Technology and the Research Agenda. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.4.29

Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre‐service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437

Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2018). Conceptualising technology practice in education using Bourdieu’s sociology. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/http://www.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1462205

Cherner,T., & Mitchell, C. (2021) Deconstructing EdTech frameworks based on their creators, features, and usefulness, Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 91-116, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1773852

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused : computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.

Elstad, E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2017). Perceptions of Digital Competency among Student Teachers: Contributing to the Development of Student Teachers’ Instructional Self-Efficacy in Technology-Rich Classrooms. Education Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010027

Emejulu, A., & Mcgregor, C. (2019). Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1234494

Engen, B. K. (2019). Understanding social and cultural aspects of teachers’ digital competencies. Comunicar, 27(61), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-01

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). NMC/ CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K–12 Edition. The New Media Consortium.

Graham C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019) Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y

Hwee Ling Koh, J. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 577-595 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5

Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016

Johannesen, M., Øgrim, L., & Giæver, T. H. (2014). Notion in motion: Teachers’ digital competence. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04), 300-312. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-05

Jurica, J., & Webb, L. (2016). The Use of Technology in K-12 Classrooms. In G. Chamblee, & L. Langub (Eds.), Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 2887–2892). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/172104

Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5

Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher Educators' Digital Competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273

Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-04

McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2019). Digital Competence in Teacher Education. Output 1 of the Erasmus + funded Developing Student Teachers' Digital Competence (DICTE) project. https:// dicte.oslomet.no/

Introducing the PEAT model

nordiccie.org NJCIE 2021, Vol. 5(4), 5–17

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054

Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x

Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report. EU: Luxembourg Publications Office. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/european-framework-digital-competence-educators-digcompedu

Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x

Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: the role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577949

Spante, M., Sofkova Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143

Starkey, L., (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age, Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users' acceptance of e-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635

Tømte, C., Kårstein, A., & Olsen, D. S. (2013). IKT i lærerutdanningen. På vei mot profesjonsfaglig digital kompetanse? [ICT in teacher Education: Developing Professional Digital Competence]. NIFU.

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009

Tondeur, J., Howard, S.K., Yang, J., (2021). One-size does not fit all: Towards an adaptive model to develop preservice teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behaviour, 116, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106659

Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gomez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model (No. JRC101254). Joint Research Centre (Seville).

UNESCO (2011) UNESCO ICT COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHERS. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002134/213475e.pdf

UNESCO (2018) UNESCO ICT COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHERS. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002657/265721e.pdf

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology Integration Barriers: Urban School Mathematics Teachers Perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y

Winner, L. (2009). Information Technology and Educational Amnesia. Policy Futures in Education, 7(6), 587–591. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2009.7.6.587

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

McDonagh, A., Camilleri, P., Engen, B. K., & McGarr, O. (2021). Introducing the PEAT model to frame professional digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4226