Discourses of democratic education in the preparation of teachers for international contexts
an analysis of curriculum documents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4944Keywords:
international education, teacher education, international schools, democratic educationAbstract
This article offers a critical and comparative view of democratic education as expressed in curriculum documents of ten teacher education programmes aimed at educating teachers for international contexts. Democracy and democratic education are concepts with contested meanings, and I use the discourses of democratic education identified by Sant (2019) as an analytical tool for mapping the understandings or approaches present in the documents. Intercultural competence, global citizenship, and International Mindedness are contested and overlapping concepts which intersect with these democratic discourses. The tension between a neoliberal discourse and a traditional focus on international-mindedness and global citizenship is often described as characteristic of international schools. The “internationalist” ethos dominates course descriptions and learning objectives. While several discourses of democratic education are present, the focus is mainly individual and geared towards intercultural understanding rather than democratic competences. The idea of the student as a citizen beyond the limits of the classroom walls is not very visible, nor are concepts of power and privilege.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
Ávalos, B., & Razquin, P. (2017). The Role of Policy as a Shaping Influence on Teacher Education and Teacher Educators: Neo-Liberalism and its Forms. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 1117-1132). SAGE Publications.
Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. G. (2019). Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives. Wiley.
Barratt Hacking, E., Blackmore, C., Bullock, K., Bunnell, T., Donnelly, M., & Martin, S. (2016). The International Mindedness Journey: School Practices for Developing and Assessing International Mindedness Across the IB Curriculum. University of Bath.
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929I
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: democratic education for a human future (Vol. 2). Paradigm.
Bittencourt, T., & Willetts, A. (2018). Negotiating the tensions: A critical study of international schools’ mission statements. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(4), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2018.1512047
Bray, M. (2010). Comparative education and international education in the history of Compare: boundaries, overlaps and ambiguities. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2010.523224
Bunnell, T. (2008). International education and the ‘second phase’: a framework for conceptualizing its nature and for the future assessment of its effectiveness. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 38(4), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920701420841
Bunnell, T. (2016). Teachers in international schools: a global educational 'precariat'? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(4), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2015.1068163
Cambridge, J., & Thompson, J. (2004). Internationalism and globalization as contexts for international education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 34(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305792042000213994
Carr, P. (2008). Educating for Democracy: With or without Social Justice. Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.), 35(4), 117-136.
Castro, P., Lundgren, U., & Woodin, J. (2015). International Mindedness through the looking glass: Reflections on a concept. Journal of research in international education, 14(3), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240915614202
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education by John Dewey. Project Gutenberg.
Dolby, N., & Rahman, A. (2008). Research in International Education. Review of educational research, 78(3), 676-726. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320291
Dvir, Y., Shields, R., & Yemini, M. (2018). Three faces of global citizenship education: IB Schools' self-representations in four local contexts. British journal of educational studies, 66(4), 455-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1533102
Edling, S., & Simmie, G. M. (2020). Democracy and Teacher Education: Dilemmas, Challenges and Possibilities. Taylor & Francis.
EIU. (2021). Democracy Index 2020: In Sickness and in Health? T. E. Group. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyze talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods (pp. 25-38). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (2011). Semiotic Aspects of Social Transformation and Learning. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An Introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed.) (pp. 119-127). Routledge.
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the World 2021: Democracy under Siege. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021/democracy-under-siege
Freire, P., & Ramos, M. B. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Gandin, L. A., & Apple, M. W. (2002). Thin versus thick democracy in education: Porto Alegre and the creation of alternatives to neo-liberalism. International studies in sociology of education, 12(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210200200085
Gardner-McTaggart, A. (2016). International elite, or global citizens? Equity, distinction and power: the International Baccalaureate and the rise of the South. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.959475
Gardner-McTaggart, A. C. (2021). Washing the world in whiteness; international schools’ policy. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 53(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2020.1844162
Gee, J. P. (2011). Discourse Analysis: What Makes it Critical? In R. Rogers (Ed.), An Introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed. ed., pp. 23-45). Routledge.
Hart-Davidson, W., Zappen, J. P., & Halloran, S. M. (2005). On the formation of democratic citizens: Rethinking the rhetorical tradition in a digital age. The viability of the rhetorical tradition, 125-140.
Haywood, T. (2015). International Mindedness and Its Enemies. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. THompson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 45-58). SAGE. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.4135/9781473943506
Hill Collins, P. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press.
Hill, I. (2015). The History and Development of International Mindedness. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 28-44). SAGE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473943506
ISC Research. (2021). About the International Schools Market. ISC Research. Retrieved 06.05.2021 from https://www.iscresearch.com/
Kincheloe, J. (2012). Teachers as Researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203801550
Levy, J., & Fox, R. (2016). Pre-service Teacher Preparation for International Settings. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 275-297).
Little, A. W. (2010). International and comparative education: what’s in a name? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 845-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2010.523264
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Epistemic Tools and Artefacts in Epistemic Practices and Systems. In (pp. 233-264). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4369-4_9
Matthews, J., & Sidhu, R. (2005). Desperately seeking the global subject: international education, citizenship and cosmopolitanism. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 3(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720500046179
Oztok, M. (2019). The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning : Understanding Social Justice Through Critical Pedagogy. Routledge.
Pashby, K., da Costa, M., Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. (2020). A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education, 56(2), 144-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352
Sant, E. (2019). Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006–2017). Review of educational research, 89(5), 655-696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2008). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1604/9780470751985
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2010). The Politics and Economics of Comparison. Comparative Education Review, 54(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1086/653047
Sylvester, R. (2015). Historical Resources for Research in International Education 1851-1950. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 13-28). SAGE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473943506
Teekens, H. (2000). Teaching and learning in the international classroom. Internationalisation at home: A position paper, 29-34.
van Werven, I. (2016). Preparing Globally Competent Teachers for the International School Context. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education (pp. 298-308). SAGE.
Yeh, C. (2018, 09/01/). Democratic Accountability in the Neoliberal Era: The Politics of Teaching and Teacher Education in Mathematics Classrooms. Policy Futures in Education, 16(6), 764-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1478210318776470
Åberg, I. B. (2020). Diversity is the others: a critical investigation of ‘diversity’ in two recent education policy documents. Intercultural Education, 31(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1702294
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karianne Helland
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
