Futures Thinking in Middle School Science Textbooks
A Perspective from Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5647Keywords:
Middle School Science, Future Thinking, Textbook Analysis, Interdisciplinarity, JapanAbstract
This research aims to illuminate the characteristics of "Futures Thinking" components within the interdisciplinary units of "Science, Technology, and Humanity" and "Nature and Humanity" and "Sustainable development" within Japanese middle school science textbooks. Grounded in pre-existing literatures, this research meticulously organizes the essential competencies of future-oriented thinking into three distinct components: "Envisioning the Future," "Predicting the Future," and "Planning for the Future." Each component is further broken down into more precise indicators. For "Envisioning the Future," indicators include perspectives on "Multiple Futures," the "Science of Future," and "Hope and Fears." For "Predicting the Future," we delve into the "Scenario" technique, alongside "Forecasting" and "Backcasting" strategies. "Planning for the Future" assesses the "Precautionary" approach, "Evaluating Action," and understanding "Risk and Changes." The research involved a cross-sectional analysis of content types (such as texts, diagrams) and contexts (individual, regional, national, and global), determining the presence or absence of these indicators. The findings reveal: (1) a more frequent articulation of these competencies within the "Science, Technology, and Humans" unit, (2) a scant representation of "Multiple Futures" and "Scenario" methods among the nine indicators, (3) a prevalence of explanatory text in presenting these concepts, and (4) a consistent inclination towards a global context in the textbooks' narratives. These insights imply an extant gap within the current pedagogical tools, underscoring the importance of an expanded, multifaceted approach to teaching these competencies. The implications for future curriculum development and instructional strategies in middle school science education are profound, necessitating a more integrated approach that resonates with the uncertainties and possibilities of the future.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Arima, A., Kobayashi, M. Aoki, M., Imamura, S., Ezaki, S., Endo, K., Oasa, Y., Oshika, S., Oshima, A., Ohashi, I., Otsuji, N., Onishi, T., Okada, H., Okada, T., Ogawa, M., Ken, H., Kato, Y., Hiroku, K., ... , Watanabe T. (2021). Rika no Sekai 3 [The world of science 3]. Dainippon Tosho.
Barelli, E. (2017). Science of complex systems and future-scaffolding skills: A pilot study with secondary school students [Master’s thesis in Physics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Boogna]. AMSLaurea Institutional Theses Repository (Accession No. 13644). https://amslaurea.unibo.it/13644/1/EB_Tesi_solotesto.pdf
Branchetti, L., Cutler, M., Laherto, A., Levrini, O., Palmgren, E. K., Tasquier, G., & Wilson, C. (2018). The I SEE -project: An approach to futurize STEM education. Visions for sustainability, 9, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/2770
Central Education Council. (2016). On the improvement of the course of study for kindergartens, elementary schools, junior high schools, high schools, and schools for special needs education, and necessary measures (No. 197) (in Japanese). https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/1380731.htm
Chou, P. I. (2021). The representation of global issues in Taiwanese elementary school science textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(4), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10083-9
Dahlbeck, J. (2014). Hope and fear in education for sustainable development. Critical Studies in Education, 55(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.839460
Erduran, S. (2014). Beyond nature of science: The case for reconceptualising ‘science’ for science education. Science Education International, 25(1), 93–111. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022972.pdf
Fujimoto, Y., Takahashi, K., Shindo, K., Fujiwara, T., Arita, K., Saitoh, K., & Shimada, T. (2021). Success in population control of the invasive largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides through removal at spawning sites in a Japanese shallow lake. Management of Biological Invasions, 12(4), 997–1011, https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2021.12.4.13
Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765147
Hervé, N., & Panissal, N. (2022). Writing fictional short stories about the Anthropocene: Effects on students’ Futures Thinking. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.842252
Hirano, M., Yonomoto, T., Ishigaki, M., Watanabe, N., Maruyama, Y., Shibamoto, Y., Watanabe, T., Moriyama, K., (2012). Insights from review and analysis of the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2011.636538
Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Launders, K. (2012). Developing students’ futures thinking in science education. Research in Science Education, 42, 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9214-9
Julien, M. P., Chalmeau, R., Mainar, C. V., & Léna, J. Y. (2018). An innovative framework for encouraging future thinking in ESD: A case study in a French school. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Futures Studies, 101, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.012
Kajita, R., Shingyoji, C., Nagahara, Y., Nishihara, Y., Azuma, T., Arai, Y., Arao, S., Iimure, T., Iokawa, Y., Izumi., S., Irino, G., Iwai, H., Ueda, T., Uemura, T., Udagawa, M., Ebisaki, I., Eriguchi, H., Ohki, S., ... , Watanabe, N. (2021). Tankyūsuru atarashii kagaku [A new science to explore 3]. Tokyo Shoseki.
Kapon, S., Erduran, S. (2021). Crossing boundaries–Examining and problematizing interdisciplinarity in science education. In O. Levrini, G. Tasquier, T. G. Amin, L. Branchetti, & M. Levin (Eds.), Engaging with contemporary challenges through science education research. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74490-8_21
Kiguchi, K., Iwami, K., Yasuda, M., Watanabe, K., & Fukuda, T. (2003). An exoskeletal robot for human shoulder joint motion assist. IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics, 8(1), 125–135.
Kohiga, M., & Yoshida, J. (2013). A01 Handling of ESD-related content in middle school science textbooks. Proceedings of the Japan Science Education Association Tokai Branch Meeting, 59, A01 (in Japanese). https://dl.ndl.go.jp/pid/10417355/1/1
Laherto, A., Rasa, T. (2022). Facilitating transformative science education through futures thinking. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 30(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2021-0114
Levrini, O., Tasquier, G., Branchetti, L., & Barelli, E. (2019). Developing future-scaffolding skills through science education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2647–2674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1693080
Li, X., Tian, H., & Li, D. (2009). Why the crested ibis declined in the middle twentieth century. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 2165–2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9580-z
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Social Science Open Access Repository. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2017). Courses of study for middle school science (in Japanese). https://www.mext.go.jp/ content/20210830-mxt_kyoiku01-100002608_05.pdf
Morimoto, Y. (2011). What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0120-5
Murofushi, K., Yoro, T., Maruyama, S., Morimoto, S., Kitahara, K., Inada, Y., Endo, H., Okuda, H., Katahira, K., Kakutani, S., Kaneko, S., Kamijo, Y., Kawakami, S., Kawasaki, K., Kinoshita, H., Kudo, S., Goto, K., ... , Yokoyama, H., (2021). Shizen no tankyū chūgakurika 3 [Exploring nature: Middle school science 3]. Kyoiku Shuppan.
Nagata, Y. (2017). A critical review of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in Japan: Beyond the practice of pouring new wine into old bottles. Educational Studies in Japan, 11, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.11.29
National Institute for Educational Policy Research (NIER)(2012). Final report of study on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in schools. (In Japanese). https://www.nier.go.jp/kaihatsu/pdf/esd_saishuu.pdf
Nedorezov, L. V. (2016). The dynamics of the lynx–hare system: An application of the Lotka–Volterra model. Biophysics, 61, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1134/S000635091601019X
OECD (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital World, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en.
Ojala, M. (2017). Hope and anticipation in education for a sustainable future. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Futures Studies, 94, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.10.004
Okamoto, Y. (2015). Innovations in science instruction from an ESD perspective: Teaching material interpretation based on the structural concepts of creating a sustainable society. Research Report of the Japan Science Education Association, 29(8), 37–40 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.14935/jsser.29.8_37
Oya, T., Kamata, M., Osumi, Y., Akiyoshi, H., Abe, O., Arai, N., Ikeda, Y., Ishikawa, S., Izumi, N., Ito, A., Itonori, S., Imamura, T., Ueda, M., Uchiyama, H., Ane, K., Eguchi, T., Endo, E., ... ,Wada, E. (2021). Mirai e hirogaru saiensu 3 [Science expanding to the future 3]. Keirinkan.
Rasa, T., Palmgren, E., & Laherto, A. (2022). Futurising science education: Students’ experiences from a course on Futures Thinking and quantum computing. Instructional Science, 50(3), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09572-3
Redman, A., Wiek, A., & Barth, M. (2021). Current practice of assessing students’ sustainability competencies: A review of tools. Sustainability Science, 16(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00855-1
Rieckmann M., Mindt L., Gardiner S. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
Sagoff, M. (2016). Are there general causal forces in ecology?. Synthese, 193(9), 3003–3024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0907-x
Schreier, M., Stamann, C., Janssen, M., Dahl, T., & Whittal, A. (2019). Qualitative content analysis: Conceptualizations and challenges in research practice—introduction to the FQS special issue "Qualitative content analysis I". Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3393
Shimoda, K., Morimoto, S., Azuma, T., Ishikawa, K., Isozaki, T., Inagaki, S., Iwaki, N., Koji, F., Ohara, H., Kamata, M., Kiryu, T., Kubota, K., Kurita, K., Kurihara, J. Kobayashi, E., Sato, T., Sugawara, T., ... ,Yamada T. (2021). Chūgakkō kagaku 3 [Middle school science 3]. Gakko Tosho.
Smart, A., Sinclair, M., Benavot, A., Bernard, J., Chabbott, C., Russell, S. G., & Williams, J. (2020). Learning for uncertain futures: the role of textbooks, curriculum, and pedagogy. Background paper for the Futures of Education initiative. Commissioned by UNESCO. Zugriff am, 29.
Sprenger, S., & Peter, C. (2019). An analysis of the representation of sustainable development goals in textbook maps and atlases in educational contexts. International Journal of Cartography, 5(2–3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2019.1613615
Takeuchi, K. (2010). Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama Initiative. Ecological Research, 25(5), 891–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0745-8
Takamura, K. (2007). Performance as a fish predator of largemouth bass [Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède)] invading Japanese freshwaters: A review. Ecological Research, 22, 940–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0415-7
Thielen, H. (2012). The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident—An overview. Health physics, 103(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31825b57ec
Uchida, T. (2015). Scenario workshop on future energy policy: Development and implementation of science teaching materials using participatory technology assessment method. Science Education Research, 55(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.11639/sjst.14024
Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
Withycombe, L. K. (2010). Anticipatory competence as a key competence in sustainability education [Unpublished master’s thesis, Arizona State University].
Wingfield, J.C., Ishii, S., Kikuchi, M., Wakabayashi, S., Sakai, H., Yamaguchi, N., Wada, M., & Chikatsuji, K. (2000). Biology of a critically endangered species, the Toki (Japanese Crested Ibis) Nipponia nippon. Ibis, 142(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb07677.x
Xu, Z., & Todorov, E. (2016). Design of a highly biomimetic anthropomorphic robotic hand towards artificial limb regeneration. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3485–3492. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487528
Yamazaki, A., & Masuda, R. (2012). Autonomous foods handling by chopsticks for meal assistant robot. ROBOTIK 2012; 7th German Conference on Robotics, Munich, Germany (pp. 1-6). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6309511
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Khalifatulloh Fiel'ardh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
