Exploring gender equity in higher education pedagogy
A co-constructed comparative case study of Kazakhstan and India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5968Emneord (Nøkkelord):
gender equity, higher education, inclusive curriculum, comparative studySammendrag
Higher education spaces are embedded within the larger ecosystem of societies, and they simultaneously endorse, question, critique, and transform societal norms. Exploring gender equity in higher education curriculum and pedagogy involves examining the systemic, social, and cultural dynamics that influence gender disparities within academic spaces and society. Examining gender mainstreaming in higher education pedagogy is essential to address systemic biases, promote inclusive teaching practices, and ensure that all students, regardless of gender, have equal opportunities to succeed. A co-constructed comparative case study of Kazakhstan and India provides a unique lens to understand these disparities and devise strategies to address them. In this study, we analyzed data collected from two universities to understand the challenges and curriculum and pedagogic practices that can create more equitable spaces. By adopting a collaborative research approach, this comparative study reveals common challenges, successful strategies, and practices that can help create gender equity and inclusivity in higher education. Findings indicate that while gender awareness and sensitivity are in the minds of the stakeholders, they are not embedded in the curriculum. Data analysis further demonstrates the need to incorporate more representative voices from different genders across the curriculum, both as textual material and as more diverse faculty. We argue that deep-rooted patriarchal norms and systemic barriers that continue to hinder gender inclusivity can be addressed not by creating specific courses or programs but by a holistic, inclusive curriculum that embeds gender equity in every aspect of higher education.
Nedlastinger
Statistikk
Referanser
Abdikadyrova, Z., Kadyrov, Z., Talaspayeva, Z., & Sharypkazy, N. (2018). The role of women in Kazakh nomadic society. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAK, September 2018 Special Edition, pp. 2404-2419.
Agrawal, S. (2021, July 23). Women in STEM: The growing numbers, challenges and whether it translates into jobs. The Print. https://theprint.in/india/education/women-in-stem-the-growing-numbers-challenges-and-whether-it-translates-into-jobs/700564/
Anessova, A., Bekbossinov, A., & Abdullayeva, B. (2024). Socio-Economic Gender Inequality in Kazakhstan: Analysis based on the Cluster Approach. Eurasian Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejgs.v1i2.13
Bekbossinova, A. (2024). The Labour Market Through the Prism of Gender: The Case of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejgs.v1i2.11
Boddy, J., Statham, J., Danielsen, I., Geurts, E., Join-Lambert, H., & Euillet, S. (2013). Beyond Contact: Work with Families of Children Placed Away from Home in Four European Countries. Nuffield Foundation.
Cassese, E. C., & Bos, A. L. (2013). A hidden curriculum? Examining the gender content in introductory-level political science textbooks. Politics & Gender, 9(2), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000068
Census (2011). Literacy Rates by Age and State/UT. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
CohenMiller, A. (2024). Transformative moments in qualitative research: Method, theory, and reflection. Routledge.
CohenMiller, A., & Boivin, N. (2021). Questions in qualitative social justice research in multicultural contexts. Routledge.
CohenMiller, A., Dresscher-Lambertus, N., & Samuel, N. (forthcoming). Creativity as wayfinding: Towards a transformative artful leadership praxis. In K. Pithouse-Morgan, D. Pillay, C. MItchell, R. Berkey, & A. Hart (Eds.), The Handbook of Arts-Based Educational Research (Section 5: Artful Leadership). Bloomsbury Publishers.
CohenMiller, A., Durrani, N., Kataeva, Z., & Makhmetova, Z. (2022). Conducting focus groups in multicultural educational contexts: Lessons learned and methodological insights. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221076928
CohenMiller, A. S., & Grace, K. (forthcoming). Justice-centered mixed methods research. The Guilford Press.
CohenMiller, A. S., Hinton-Smith, T., Mazanderani, F., & Samuel, N. (2022). Leading change in gender and diversity in higher education from margins to mainstream. Routledge.
CohenMiller, A. S., & Pate, E. (2019). A Model for Developing Interdisciplinary Research Theoretical Frameworks. The Qualitative Report - TQR, 24(6), 1211-1226. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3558
Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., & Parodi, F. (2020). The gender pay gap in the UK: children and experience in work. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(4), 855-881. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa053
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Darji, M., Panchal, P., & Belani, S. (2016). The challenges faced by Indian working women are in balancing professional and social life in the 21st century. Indian Journal of Technical Education, Special Issue for ICWSTCSC-2016.
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471
Duraiswamy, P. (2002). Changes in returns to education in India, 1983–94: by gender, age-cohort, and location. Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 609-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00047-4
Durrani, N., CohenMiller, A., Kataeva, Z., Bekzhanova, Z., Seitkhadyrova, A., & Badanova, A. (2022). ‘The fearful khan and the delightful beauties’: The construction of gender in secondary school textbooks in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Educational Development, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102508
Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. W. (2021). Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: A sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010
Dzhumabayeva, A. M. (2019). Directions of state regulation of the agro-industrial complex in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Вестник университета «Туран» [Bulletin of Turan University], 1, 187-192. https://vestnik.turan-edu.kz/jour/article/view/686
Fiske, E. B., & UNESCO. (2012). World Atlas of Gender Equality in Education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000215522/PDF/215522eng.pdf.multi
Gimranova, A., Shamatov, D., Sharplin, E., & Durrani, N. (2021). Education in Kazakhstan. In C. C. Wolhuter, & H. J. Steyn (Eds.), Education Systems Entering the Twenty-First Century (pp. 404–438). Keurkopie.
Goddard, J. T., Cranston, N., & Billot, J. (2006). Making it work: Identifying the challenges of collaborative international research. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 10(11), 1–5. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/download/611/273/611
Gohain, P. (2021, June 11). 18% more women in higher education in 5 years. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/18-more-women-in-higher-education-in-5-years/articleshow/83415039.cms
Government of West Bengal. (2022). Kanyashree and the Agenda 2030. https://wbkanyashree.gov.in/readwrite/notice_publications/kp_sdg.pdf
Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hartley, M., Gopaul, B., Sagintayeva, A., & Apergenova, R. (2016). Learning autonomy: Higher education reform in Kazakhstan. Higher Education, 72(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9953-z
Hinton-Smith, T., Mazanderani, F., Samuel, N., & CohenMiller, A. (2022). Co-creating cross-cultural approaches to gender mainstreaming: Experiences and challenges in developing an interdisciplinary, international feminist knowledge-exchange research approach. In A. S. CohenMiller, T. Hinton-Smith, F. Mazanderani, & N. Samuel (Eds.), Leading change in gender and diversity in higher education from margins to mainstream (pp. 259–279). Routledge.
Jamieson, M. K., Govaart, G. H., & Pownall, M. (2023). Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12735
Jumakulov, Z., & Ashirbekov, A. (2016). Higher education internationalization: Insights from Kazakhstan. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.14413/HERJ.2016.01.03
Kannabiran, K., & Swaminathan, P. (2017). Introduction: Re-presenting Feminist Methodologies. In K. Kannabiran & P. Swaminathan (Eds.), Re-Presenting Feminist Methodologies: Interdisciplinary Explorations (pp. 1-23). Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207100
Kathuriya, P. (2018). Introduction: Through A Feminist Lens. In P. Kathuriya & A. Bhaiya (Eds.), Indian Feminisms: Individual and Collective Journeys (pp. 1-11). Zubaan.
Khairullayeva, V., Sarybayev, M., Kuzembayeva, A., Yermekbayev, A., & Baikushikova, G. (2022). Gender Policy in Kazakhstan. Journal of International Women's Studies, 24(1). https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol24/iss1/25
Knight, J. (2013). The Changing Landscape of Higher Education Internationalisation - For Better or Worse? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(3), 84–90. https://doi:10.1080/13603108.2012.753957
Krishna, G. (2019, May 20). Mukhyamantri Kanya Utthaan Yojana. Tesz. https://www.tesz.in/guide/mukhyamantri-kanya-utthaan-yojana
Kuraev, A. (2014). Internationalization of higher education in Russia: Collapse or perpetuation of the Soviet system? A historical and conceptual study [PhD dissertation]. Boston College. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3799
Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2017). Female academic leadership in the post-Soviet context. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116682040
Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2009). Gender and the Changing Face of Higher Education: A Feminized Future? Open University Press.
MacKinnon, C. A. (2017). Butterfly Politics: Changing the World for Women. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv34j7ms4
Makoelle, T. M. (2020). Language, terminology, and inclusive education: A case of Kazakhstani transition to inclusion. Sage Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902089
Menon, N. (2004). Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. University of Illinois Press.
Ministry of Education. (2024). All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) Report 2021-22. Department of Higher Education, Government of India. https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s392049debbe566ca5782a3045cf300a3c/uploads/2024/02/20240719952688509.pdf
Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2017). Bulleten o vysshyh uchebnyh zavedeniyah Respubliki Kazakhstan na nachalo 2017/2018 uchebnogo goda [Statistical Newsletter on Higher Educational Institutions in the Republic of Kazakhstan in the beginning of 2017/2018 academic year].
Morley, L. (2010). Gender mainstreaming: myths and measurement in higher education in Ghana and Tanzania. Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(4), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2010.490377
Morley, L. (2013). Women and Higher Education Leadership: Absences and Aspirations. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. https://www.ses.unam.mx/curso2015/pdf/23oct-Morley.pdf
Mulvihill, T. M., & Swaminathan, R. (2022). Collaborative qualitative research. Guilford Press.
Naidoo, R., & Williams, J. (2015). The Neoliberal Regime in English Higher Education: Charters, Consumers and the Erosion of the Public Good. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.939098
National Savings Institute. (2022). Sukanya Samriddhi Account Scheme. https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2022/jan/doc20221207101.pdf
Nazarbayev University. (2021). Data digest 2021-2022. https://ie.nu.edu.kz/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/NU-Data-digest-2021-2022-final-Nov16.pdf
O’Connor, P. (2020). Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1737903
O’Shea, S. (2016). Avoiding the manufacture of ‘sameness’: First-in-family students, cultural capital and the higher education environment. Higher Education, 72, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9938-y
OECD. (2015). Reforming Kazakhstan: Progresses, challenges and opportunities. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/04/reforming-kazakhstan_c71ae50f/18ba0d60-en.pdf
Pearse, R., & Connell, R. (2015). Gender Norms and the Economy: Insights from Social Research. Feminist Economics 22(1), 30-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1078485
Pereira, M. (2021). Researching gender inequalities in academic labor during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Avoiding common problems and asking different questions. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12618
Pfaff-Czarnecka, J., Thieme, S. & Kölbel, A. (2022). Introduction: Universities as transformative social spaces. In A. Kölbel, J. Pfaff-Czarnecka, & S. Thieme (Eds.), Universities as Transformative Social Spaces: Mobilities and Mobilizations from South Asian Perspectives (pp. 1-28). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865571.003.0001
Priya, A. (2021, January 3). Chhattisgarh Saraswati Cycle Yojana. https://www.indiangovtscheme.com/2021/01/chhattisgarh-saraswati-cycle-yojana-2021.html
Rios, D., Stewart, A. J., & Winter, D. G. (2010). "Thinking she could be the next president": Why identifying with the curriculum matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01578.x
Rodrigo, R., & Clavero, S. (2022). Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2007446
Sahu, B., Jeffery, P., & Nakkeeran, N. (2017). Barriers to higher education: commonalities and contrasts in the experiences of Hindu and Muslim young women in urban Bengaluru. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1220825
Siddiqi, N. (2021.) Gender inequality as a social construction in India: A phenomenological enquiry. Women's Studies International Forum, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102472
Slatton, B. C., & Brailey, C. D. (2019). Introduction: Inequality and the Complex Positionalities of 21st Century Women. In B. C. Slatton, & C. D. Brailey (Eds.), Women and Inequality in the 21st Century (pp. 1-6). Routledge.
Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2022). Critically considering the ‘inclusive curriculum’ in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(8), 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122937
Tillmar, M. (2015). Cross-cultural comparative case studies: a means of uncovering dimensions of trust. In F. Lyon, G. Möllering, & M. N. K. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods on Trust (2nd ed.) (pp. 126–133). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547419.00021
Taylor, C. A., Hughes, C., & Ulmer, J. B. (Eds.) (2020). Transdisciplinary feminist research: Innovations in theory, method and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199776
Verge, T. (2021). Gender equality policy and universities: Feminist strategic alliances to re-gender the curriculum. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 42(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2021.1904763
Verge, T., Ferrer-Fons, M., & González, M. J. (2018). Resistance to mainstreaming gender into the higher education curriculum. European Journal of Women's Studies, 25(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816688237
World Economic Forum (2024). Global Gender Gap Report 2024. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2024.pdf
Wright, T. (2014). Whatever happened to the F word in higher education? Journal of Gender Studies, 25(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2014.931801
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2025 Nupur Samuel, Anna CohenMiller, Abhinav Anand, Aigul Rakisheva, Aray Saniyazova
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
