Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5155Emneord (Nøkkelord):
Computed Tomography, Requisition Form, Audit, JustificationSammendrag
Introduction: Medical imaging requisition form is a vital document in the radiology department. Adequate filling ensures justification and effective communication which impacts patient care. This study aims to audit computed tomography (CT) requisition forms to determine their adequate filling and legibility in the Himalayan country, Nepal.
Methods: A total of 239 CT requisition forms were collected from the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal through random sampling from June to August 2020. The availability of information such as demographic characteristics, clinical history, clinical diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and proper name of CT procedures was audited. The legibility of the provided information was categorized with the help of a senior radiographer having 10 years of experience.
Results: Clinical history was present in 28 percent and clinical diagnosis in 64 percent of forms. Furthermore, 44 percent of contrast-enhanced procedures requiring IV contrast agents did not have a report of renal function test. Surprisingly, details on the last menstrual period for women of the reproductive age group were missing in all requisition forms.
Conclusion: Available information is not sufficient for justification of patient dose. Clinicians need to fill up the requisition form properly for quality patient care in the radiology department.
Referanser
References
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra072149
Vom J, Williams I. Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues? J Med Radiat Sci. 2017;64(3):212–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.211
Depasquale R, Crockford M. Are Radiology Request Forms Adequately Filled In? An Audit Assessing Local Practice. Malta Med J . 2005;17(4):36–8.
Aabesh K, Bhandari S. Are Clinicians Communicating adequately with Radiologists through Radiological requisition? A Clinical Audit assessing Current local practice. Nepal Med J. 2022;4(2):44–8. https://doi.org/10.37080/nmj.132
Badu M. Study of missing clinical details in computed tomography radiology request forms: A descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58(222):94–7. https://doi.org/10.31729%2Fjnma.4674
Akintomide A, Ikpeme A, Ngaji A, Ani N, Udofia A. An audit of the completion of radiology request forms and the request practice. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2015;4(3):328. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161308
Zafar U, Abid A, Ahmad B, Ahmad HA, Zafar F, Baig MU, et al. Adequacy of Completion of Computed Tomography Scan Request Forms at a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan: A Clinical Audit. Cureus. 2018;10(10). https://doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.3470
Frush DP, Applegate K. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):113–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.012
Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C, Horton P, Järvinen H, Mayo J, et al. Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: Some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation. Br J Radiol. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1259%2Fbjr%2F42893576
Triantopoulou C, Tsalafoutas I, Maniatis P, Papavdis D, Raios G, Siafas I, et al. Analysis of radiological examination request forms in conjunction with justification of X-ray exposures. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(2):306–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.02.012
Gyawali J, Mallik M, Adhikari D, Sah S, Shah P, Maharjan S. Awareness regarding radiation knowledge among clinicians practicing in Bharatpur, Nepal. Radiogr Open. 2017;3(1):18. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.1994
Martin CJ, Vassileva J, Vano E, Mahesh M, Ebdon-Jackson S, Ng KH, et al. Unintended and accidental medical radiation exposures in radiology: Guidelines on investigation and prevention. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37(4):883–906. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa881e
Adhikari KP, Jha LN, Galan MP. Status of radiation protection at different hospitals in Nepal. J Med Phys. 2012 Oct;37(4):240-4.. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.103611
Maharjan, S. (2017). Radiation knowledge among radiographers and radiography students. Radiography Open, 3(1), 17.https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.2000
Maharjan S, Parajuli K, Sah S, Poudel U. Knowledge of radiation protection among radiology professionals and students: A medical college-based study. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;7:100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100287
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2023 Anjan Dangal, Surendra Maharjan
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).